Radioprotection : un point d’avancement

Free Access

Editorial

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 59, Number 4, October - December 2024


Page(s)		247 - 249
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024051
Published online		13 December 2024

Ando R, Koyama Y, Kobayashi T, Sasaki D, Akimoto N, Schneider T, Lochard J, Kanai Y. 2023. Report on the 24th Fukushima Dialogue “Creating the Future of Fukushima Together With The Next Generation”. Radioprotection 58(3), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023021. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Andresz S, Zéphir A, Bez J, Karst M, Danieli J. 2022. Artificial intelligence and radiation protection. A game changer or an update? Radioprotection 57(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Benderitter M, Herrera Reyes E, Benadjaoud MA, Vanhavere F, Impens N, Mayerhofer-Sebera U, Hierath M, Jourdain JR, Frija G, Repussard J. 2021. MEDIRAD formulation of science-based recommendations for medical radiation protection: A stakeholder forum survey. Radioprotection 56(4), 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bertho JM, Gabillaud-Poillion F, Reuter C, Riviere O. 2022.Comparative study of nuclear post-accident management doctrines in Europe and North America. Radioprotection 57(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022002. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bourguignon M, Bérard P, Bertho JM, Farah J, Mercat C, Comité éditorial de Radioprotection. 2017a. Radioprotection : quel avenir ? Radioprotection 52(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2017007. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Bourguignon M, Bérard P, Bertho JM, Farah J, Mercat C, Comité éditorial de Radioprotection. 2017b. What’s next in Radioprotection? Radioprotection 52(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2017006. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Bourguignon M, Bertho JM. 2023. Radioprotection passe en « open access » pour 2024. Radioprotection is "open access" for 2024. Radioprotection 59(2), 66–68. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024016. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Clement C, et al. 2022. Maintenir les recommandations de la CIPR adaptées aux besoins. Radioprotection 57(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Cosset JM. 2022. Is the linear no-threshold (LNT) model relevant for radiotherapy? Radioprotection 57(3), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022023. [Google Scholar]
Foray N, Averbeck D, Cosset JM, Drouet M, Favaudon V, Masse R. 2021. La radiobiologie française : historique, constats et enjeux. Radioprotection 56(4): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Laurier D, Billarand Y, Klokov D, Leuraud K. 2023. Fondements scientifiques de l’utilisation du modèle linéaire sans seuil (LNT) aux faibles doses et débits de dose en radioprotection. Radioprotection 58(4): 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023036. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Nguyen D, Farah J, Josserand-Pietri F, Barbet N, Khodri M. 2022. Benefits and challenges of standard ceiling-mounted surface guided radiotherapy systems for breast treatments on Halcyon™. Radioprotection 56(4), 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Rump A, Hermann C, Lamkowski A, Abend M, Port M. 2022. The properties and health hazards from early nuclear weapon fallout: The Castle Bravo incident revisited. Radioprotection, 57(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Swartz HM, Swarts SG, Ainsbury E, Wilkins RC, Port M, Trompier F, Flood AB, Roy L. 2022. Complementary lessons learned from the testing strategies used for radiation emergencies and COVID-19: A white paper from The International Association of Biological and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD). Radioprotection 57(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022022. [Google Scholar]
Takada M, Schneider T. 2023. Radiation doses to non-human species after the Fukushima accident and comparison with ICRP’s DCRLs: A systematic qualitative review. Radioprotection 58(3): 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023017. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Thu Zar W, Lochard J, Taira Y, Takamura N, Orita M, Matsunaga H. 2022. Risk communication in the recovery phase after a nuclear accident: The contribution of the “co-expertise process”. Radioprotection 57(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022031. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.