Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
Page(s) 57 - 64
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024035
Published online 14 March 2025
  • An J et al. 2019. Evaluation of radiation exposure from fluoroscopic examination in small animal veterinary staff using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Veterinární medicína 64(6); 266–270. [Google Scholar]
  • Badawy MK, Anderson A. 2023. Radiation protection for comforters and carers in radiology and nuclear medicine. J Medical Radiat Sci 70 (2): 103. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bly, R., 2020. Radiation safety of current European practices of therapeutic nuclear medicine: survey results from 20 HERCA countries. [Google Scholar]
  • Dietze G, Menzel HG. 1994. Aspects of ICRP 60 and ICRU 47 relevant to individual monitoring of external exposure. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 54 (3-4): 167–173. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dehghan, N. and Sina, S., 2020. Measurement of operational dosimetry quantities for nuclear medicine staff. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 190(2), 119-124. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Faghihi, R., Mehdizadeh, S., Sina, S., Alizadeh, F.N., Zeinali, B., Kamyab, G.R., Aghevlian, S., Khorramdel, H., Namazi, I., Heirani, M. and Moshkriz, M., 2012. Radiation dose to neonates undergoing X-ray imaging in special care baby units in Iran. Radiation protection dosimetry, 150(1), 55-59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fardid R et al. 2021. Evaluation of correlation between DAP (Dose-Area Product) values and cardiologist dose during coronary angiography using Monte Carlo simulation. Iran J Med Phys 18: 306–313. [Google Scholar]
  • Figueroa SD et al. 2008. ‘TLD assessment of mouse dosimetry during microCT imaging’. Medical Phys 35: 3866–3874. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Forrest LJ. 2016. Computed tomography imaging in oncology. Veterin Clin: Small Animal Pract 46: 499–513. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gregorich SL et al. 2018. Survey of veterinary specialists regarding their knowledge of radiation safety and the availability of radiation safety training. J Am Veterin Med Assoc 252: 1133–1140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Halford DK, Markham OD. 1978. Radiation dosimetry of small mammals inhabiting a liquid radioactive waste disposal area. Ecology 59: 1047–1054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hernández-Ruiz L et al. 2012. Thermoluminescent dosimetry in veterinary diagnostic radiology. Appl Radiat Isotopes 71: 44–47. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2022. Radiological protection in veterinary practice. ICRP Publication 153. Ann. ICRP 51. [Google Scholar]
  • Lawrence YA et al. 2015. Characterization, treatment, and outcome of bacterial cholecystitis and bactibilia in dogs. J Am Veterin Med Assoc 246: 982–989. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mehdizadeh, A., Sina, S., Faghihi, R. and Sadeghi, M.H., 2019. An Efficient Radiochemical Method for Extraction of 226Ra From the Soil Samples. Avicenna Journal of Medical Biochemistry, 7(2), 57-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mayer MN et al. 2018. Use of personal protective equipment in a radiology room at a veterinary teaching hospital. Veterin Radiol Ultrasound 59: 137–146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Oh H et al. 2018. Restrainer exposure to scatter radiation in practical small animal radiography measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters. Veterinární Medicína 63: 81–86. [Google Scholar]
  • Owens JM et al. 2019. Veterinary radiology—History, purpose, current status and future expectations. Veterin Radiol Ultrasound 60: 358–362. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Protection, A.R., 2009. ARPANSA-Annual Report Series. [Google Scholar]
  • Sadeghi, M., Sina, S. and Faghihi, R., 2015. Investigation of Lif, mg and Ti (TLD-100) reproducibility. Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 5(4), 217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sina S et al. 2016. Evaluation of the entrance skin dose in animals undergoing diagnostic radiology using LiF, Mg, Ti thermoluminescence dosimetry (TLD-100). Iran J Med Phys 13: 118–124. [Google Scholar]
  • Sousa CHS et al. 2021. A study to elaborate a technical manual of veterinary radioprotection. J Phys: Conf Ser 12059. [Google Scholar]
  • Vano E, Miller DL, Dauer L. 2015. Implications in medical imaging of the new ICRP thresholds for tissue reactions. Ann ICRP 44: 118–128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vatsa MA et al. 2022. Assessment of entrance surface dose (ESD) in some routine X-Rays examinations at the faculty of veterinary medicine Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. Bayero J Pure Appl Sci 13: 87–91. [Google Scholar]
  • Veneziani GR et al. 2010. Thermoluminescence measurements of entrance surface skin dose in exams of dog’s chest in veterinary radiology. Radiat Measur 45: 733–735. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Veneziani, G.R., Matsushima, L.C. and Campos, L.L., 2014. Evaluation of entrance surface-skin doses in animals submitted on exams of abdomen in veterinary radiology using Tl dosimetry. [Google Scholar]
  • Zehtabian, M., Dehghan, N., Danaei Ghazanfarkhani, M., Haghighatafshar, M. and Sina, S., 2017. Measurement of the dose to the family members taking care of thyroid cancer patients undergoing I-131 therapy in nuclear medicine using TLD-100. Radiation protection dosimetry, 174(4), 541-544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ZarifSanayei A, Sina S. 2024. ‘Measurement of Hp(10), Hp(3) and Hp(0.07) to medical staff in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, using thermoluminescence dosimetry’. Radiat Protect Dosimetry ncae008: 473–480. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.