Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 50 - 56 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024039 | |
| Published online | 14 March 2025 | |
- Alshipli M, Kabir NA, Hashim R, Marashdeh MW, Tajuddin AA. 2018. Measurement of attenuation coefficients and CT numbers of epoxy resin and epoxy-based Rhizophora spp particleboards in computed tomography energy range. Radiat Phys Chem 149: 41–48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Arenas M, Sabater S, Sintas A, Arguís M, Hernández V, Árquez M, López I, Rovirosa À, Puig D. 2017. Individualized 3D scanning and printing for non-melanoma skin cancer brachytherapy: a financial study for its integration into clinical workflow. J Contemp Brachytherapy 9: 270–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ashenafi M, Jeong S, Wancura JN, Gou L, Webster MJ, Zheng D. 2023. A quick guide on implementing and quality assuring 3D printing in radiation oncology. J Appl Clin Med Phys 24: e14102. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- AYET E. 2014. Définition et intérêt de la mesure de la hauteur utérine pour les patientes obèses. [Google Scholar]
- Beaumont T, Ideias PC, Rimlinger M, Broggio D, Franck D. 2017. Development and test of sets of 3D printed age-specific thyroid phantoms for 131I measurements. Phys Med Biol 62: 4673–4693. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Étard C, Aubert B. 2009. Analyse des évaluations de dose utérine réalisées par l’IRSN de 2004 à 2008. Radioprotection 44: 479–493. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin JC, Pujol S, Bauer C, Jennings D, Fennessy F, Sonka M, Buatti J, Aylward S, Miller JV, Pieper S, Kikinis R. 2012. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magn Reson Imaging 30: 1323–1341. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gear JI, Long C, Rushforth D, Chittenden SJ, Cummings C, Flux GD. 2014. Development of patient-specific molecular imaging phantoms using a 3D printer. Med Phys 41: 082502. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hoerner MR, Maynard MR, Rajon DA, Bova FJ, Hintenlang DE. 2018. Three-dimensional printing for construction of tissue-equivalent anthropomorphic phantoms and determination of conceptus dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 211: 1283–1290. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP Publication No: 84. 2000. Pregnancy and Medical Radiation. [Google Scholar]
- Kopačin V, Brkić H, Ivković A, Kasabašić M, Knežević Ž, Majer M, Nodilo M, Turk T, Faj D. 2023. Development and validation of the low-cost pregnant female physical phantom for fetal dosimetry in MV photon radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 25 (2): e14240. [Google Scholar]
- Matsunaga Y, Haba T, Kobayashi M, Suzuki S, Asada Y, Chida K. 2021. Fetal radiation dose of four tube voltages in abdominal CT examinations during pregnancy: a phantom study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 22: 178–184. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mayer R, Liacouras P, Thomas A, Kang M, Lin L, Simone CB. 2015. 3D printer generated thorax phantom with mobile tumor for radiation dosimetry. Rev Sci Instrum 86: 074301. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mazonakis M, Damilakis J. 2017. Estimation and reduction of the radiation dose to the fetus from external-beam radiotherapy. Phys Med 43: 148–152. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Michalet M, Dejean C, Schick U, Durdux C, Fourquet A, Kirova Y. 2022. Radiotherapy and pregnancy. Cancer Radiother 26: 417–423. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Noël A, Daul C, Aletti P, Wolf D, Iung C. 2006. De nouvelles modalités de traitement avec de nouvelles modalités d’imagerie. Radioprotection 41: S177– S193. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Robert Peter J, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. 2015. Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015: CD008136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rooney MK, Rosenberg DM, Braunstein S, Cunha A, Damato AL, Ehler E, Pawlicki T, Robar J, Tatebe K, Golden DW. 2020. Three-dimensional printing in radiation oncology: a systematic review of the literature. J Appl Clin Med Phys 21: 15–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shirkhani M, Heydarheydari S, Farshchian N, Eivazi MT, Haghparast A. 2020. Fetal dose estimation for pregnant breast cancer patients during radiotherapy using an in-house phantom. Middle East J Cancer 11: 99–104. [Google Scholar]
- Streffer C, Shore R, Konermann G, Meadows A, Uma Devi P. Preston Withers J, Holm LE, Stather J, Mabuchi KHR. 2003. Biological effects after prenatal irradiation (embryo and fetus). A report of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann ICRP 33: 5–206. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Su S, Moran K, Robar JL. 2014. Design and production of 3D printed bolus for electron radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15 (4): 194–211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.