Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 48 - 54 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025025 | |
| Published online | 20 March 2026 | |
- Abbott A. 2015. Researchers pin down risks of low-dose radiation. Nature 523: 17–18. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abe K, Hosono M, Igarashi T, Iimori T, Ishiguro M, Ito T, Nagahata T, Tsushima H, Watanabe H. 2020. The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan. Ann Nucl Med 34: 799–806. [Google Scholar]
- Alashban Y, Shubayr N. 2023. Probability of induced cancers related to computed tomography examinations. Radiat Phys Chem 210: 111020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Amaoui B, Safini F, Lahlou L, El Fahssi M, Abbaoui S, Semghouli S. 2023. Physicians’ knowledge about radiation protection of patients during prescription of CT scan procedures in Morocco. Radiat Med Prot 4 (1): 54–59. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Badiane SM, Sane PI, Ndiaye CN, Gueye K, Ndoye O, Amoussou-Guenou KM, Mbodji M. 2019. Evaluation of the knowledge of CT scan prescribers on patients’ radioprotection in Senegal. Open J Biophys 9: 204–217. [Google Scholar]
- Benamar M, Housni A, Sadiki S, Amazian K, Essahlaoui A, Labzour A. 2023. Patient dose assessment in computed tomography in a Moroccan imaging department. Radioprotection 58 (1): 49–53. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP, et al. 2009. Projected cancer risks from computed tomography scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169: 2071–2077. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bougana I, Benabdelouahab F, Loutfi A, Ouahrani AE. 2018. L’optimisation avec réduction de l’exposition du patient lors des procédures en scanographie TDM/TAP: cas des patients cancéreux au nord du Maroc. Radioprotection 53 (2): 115–122. [Google Scholar]
- Bourguignon M. 2021. Excessive patient doses through computed tomography imaging: new concerns. Radioprotection 56 (2): 89–90. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. 2007. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357: 2277–2284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dreuil S, Etard C. 2017 Exposure of the French population to ionizing radiations from medical diagnostic procedures in 2012. Radioprotection 52: 45–49. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Dubousset J, Aurengo ADB., Cabanis EA, Chouard C, Morvan G, Brunelle F, Menkes CJ. 2016. De l’usage des Rayons X en radiologie (diagnostique et interventionnelle), à l’exclusion de la radiothérapie. Rapport et recommandations. Bulletin De L Academie Nationale De Medecine. [Google Scholar]
- Ekpo EU, Adejoh T, Akwo JD, Emeka OC, Modu AA, Abba M, Adesina KA, Omiyi DO, Chiegwu UH. 2018. Diagnostic reference levels for common computed tomography (CT) examinations : results from the first Nigerian nationwide dose survey. J Radiolog Protect 38: 525–535. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Mansouri M, Talbi M, Choukri A, Nhila O, Aabid M. 2022. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for adult computed tomography in Morocco. Radioprotection 57 (1): 61–66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Frija G, Damilakis J, Paulo G, Loose R, Eliseo V, European Society of Radiology (ESR). 2021. Cumulative effective dose from recurrent CT examinations in Europe: proposal for clinical guidance based on an ESR EuroSafe Imaging survey. Eur Radiol 31 (8): 5514–5523. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals ICRP 37: 1–332. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP. 1991. The 1990 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP Publication 103. Annals ICRP 21: 1–3. [Google Scholar]
- IRSN. 2023. Analysis of data for updating diagnostic reference levels in radiology and nuclear medicine: 2012 report. [Google Scholar]
- IRSN. 2020a. Exposition de la population aux rayonnements ionisants due aux actes d’imagerie médicale diagnostique réalisés en France en 2017. https://www.irsn.fr/FR/expertise/rapports_expertise/Documents/radioprotection/IRSN_Rapport_Expri_2019.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Karim MKA, Hashim S, Bradley DA, Bakar KA, Haron MR, Kayun Z. 2016. Radiation doses from computed tomography practice in Johor Bahru, Malaysia. Radiat Phys Chem 121: 69–79. [Google Scholar]
- Laurier D, Richardson DB, Cardis E, Daniels RD, Gillies M, O’Hagan J, Hamra GB, Haylock R, Leuraud K, Moissonnier M, Schubauer-Berigan MK, Thierry-Chef I, Kesminiene A. 2017. The international nuclear workers study (Inworks): a collaborative epidemiological study to improve knowledge about health effects of protracted low-dose exposure. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 173 (1-3): 21–25. [Google Scholar]
- Lee KL, Beveridge T, Sanagou M, Thomas P. 2020. Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT. Med Imaging Radiat Sci 67 (1): 5–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Little MP. 2009. Cancer and non-cancer effects in Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Radiol Prot 29(2A): A43–A59. [Google Scholar]
- Najjar RH, Alsulaiman AM, Alraddadi JS, Alrohaimi NH, Algarni BA, Al-Arafa AM, Alsubait RA. 2022. Assessment of physicians’ knowledge and awareness about the hazards of radiological examinations on the health of their patients at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Cureus 14 (7): e27479. [Google Scholar]
- Oikarinen H, Meriläinen S, Pääkkö E, Karttunen A, Nieminen MT, Tervonen O. 2009. Unjustified CT examinations in young patients. Eur Radiol 19 (5): 1161–1165. [Google Scholar]
- Rehani MM, Heil J, Baliyan V. 2021. Multicentric study of patients receiving 50 or 100 mSv in a single day through CT imaging-frequency determination and imaging protocols involved. Eur Radiol 31 (9): 6612–6620. [Google Scholar]
- Ricketts ML, Baerlocher MO, Asch MR, Myers A. 2013. Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital. Can Assoc Radiol J 64 (3): 208–212. [Google Scholar]
- Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ, Brix G. 2019. Diagnostic reference levels for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures in Germany: update and handling. Rofo 191 (8): 739–751. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shubayr N, Alashban Y. 2023. Estimation of radiation doses and lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced cancer in the uterus and prostate from abdomen pelvis CT examinations. Front Public Health 10: 1094328. [Google Scholar]
- Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, Bowles EJA, Duncan JR, Greenlee RT, Kushi LH, Pole JD, Rahm AK, Stout NK, Weinmann S, Miglioretti DL. 2019. Tends in use of medical imaging in US health care systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000–2016. JAMA 322 (9): 843–856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tubiana M, Aurengo A, Averbeck D, Masse R. 2006, Recent reports on the effect of low doses of ionizing radiation and its dose-effect relationship. Radiat Environ Biophys 44: 245–251. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Venneri L, Rossi F, Botto N, Andreassi MG, Salcone N, Emad A, Lazzeri M, Gori C, Vano E, Picano E. 2009. Cancer risk from professional exposure in staff working in cardiac catheterization laboratory: insights from the national research council’s biological effects of ionizing radiation vii report. Am Heart J 157 (1): 118–124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yasser A, Francis C, Liu N-A., Guangming Z. 2020. Cancer risk of low dose ionizing radiation. Front Phys Sec Med Phys Imag 8–2020. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.