Diagnostic reference levels for specific clinical indications of computed tomography scans

Open Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 61, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2026


Page(s)		55 - 61
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025027
Published online		20 March 2026

Abdulkadir MK, Izge IY, Yunusa GH, Mohammed A, Osman ND. 2021. Evaluation of age-based radiation dose in paediatric patients received from head CT examination at a tertiary hospital, Nigeria. Radiat Phys Chem 182: 109380. [Google Scholar]
Aberle C, Ryckx N, Treier R, Schindera S. 2020. Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010. Eur Radiol 30(3): 1690–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06485-1. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Adejoh T, Ezugwu EE, Erondu FO, Okeji MC, Ijever AW. 2022. How well Nigerian radiographers adhere to pediatrics-specific protocols during computed tomography procedures. Rwanda Med J 79(2): 27-36. https://doi.org/10.4314/rmj.v79i2.4. [Google Scholar]
Bahadori A, Miglioretti D, Kruger R, Flynn M, Weinmann S, Smith-Bindman R, Lee C. 2015. Calculation of organ doses for a large number of patients undergoing CT examinations. Am J Roentgenol 205(4): 827–833. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.14135. [Google Scholar]
Bernier MO, Baysson H, Pearce MS, Moissonnier M, Cardis E, Hauptmann M, Struelens L, et al. 2019. Cohort profile: the EPI-CT study: a European pooled epidemiological study to quantify the risk of radiation-induced cancer from paediatric CT. Int J Epidemiol 48 (2): 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyy231. [Google Scholar]
Bezak E, Damilakis J, Rehani MM. 2023. Global status of medical physics human resource − the IOMP survey report. Physica Medica 113: 102670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102670. [Google Scholar]
Boone JM, Strauss KJ, Cody DD, McNitt-Gray MF, Toth TL. 2011. American Association of Physicist in Medicine AAPM, Report No. 204: Size-Specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. MD. [Google Scholar]
Botwe BO, Schandorf C, Inkoom S, Faanu A, Rolstadaas L, Goa PE. 2021. National indication-based diagnostic reference level values in computed tomography: preliminary results from Ghana. Phys Med 84: 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.012. [Google Scholar]
Damilakis J, Vassileva J. 2021. The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization. Phys Med 84: 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.018. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Damilakis J, Frija G, Brkljacic B, Vano E, Loose R, Paulo G, Brat H, Tsapaki V. 2023. European Society of Radiology. How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement. Insights Imaging 6; 14 (1): 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01369-x. [Google Scholar]
Dalah EZ, Alsuwaidi JS, Hamed MS, Gani AHA, Beevi HAA, Panangatil AG, et al. 2022. Challenges experienced in establishing clinical indication based diagnostic reference levels: pilot study. Eur J Radiol 148: 110046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.110046. [Google Scholar]
European Commission. 2021. Diagnostic reference levels in thirty-six European countries, Radiation Protection N° 180. Available from: Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a78331f7-7199-11eb-9ac9-01aa75ed71a1. [Google Scholar]
Foley FJ, McEntee MF, Rainford LA. 2012. Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland. Br J Radiol 85(1018): 1390–1397. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/15839549. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Habib Geryes B, Hornbeck A, Jarrige V, Pierrat N, Ducou H, Le P, Dreuil S. 2019. Patient dose evaluation in computed tomography: a French national study based on clinical indications. Phys Med 61: 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.04.004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hakme M, Rizk C, Francis Z, Fares G. 2023. Proposed national diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography examinations based on clinical indication, patient gender and size and the use of contrast in Lebanon. Radioprot 58 (2): 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023013. [Google Scholar]
Hsieh J, Flohr T. 2021. Computed tomography recent history and future perspectives. J Med Imaging 8(5): 052109. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JMI.8.5.052109. [Google Scholar]
Inoue Y. 2023. Radiation dose management in computed tomography: introduction to the practice at a single facility. Tomograph 9(3): 955–966. https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography9030078. [Google Scholar]
ICRP Publication 135. 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46: 1–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317717209. [Google Scholar]
Jin D, Harrison AP, Zhang L, Yan K, Wang Y, Cai Y, Miao S, Lu L. 2021. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Artifi Intell Med 265–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821259-2.00014-4. [Google Scholar]
Kabeer SM, Aliyu SA, Umar FK, Kamal I, Murat H, Muhammad NA, Karim MKA. 2024. Establishment of diagnostic reference level for routine CT scan examination in Sokoto state, Nigeria. Radioprot 59(3): 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024009. [Google Scholar]
Karavas K, Ece B, Aydın S, Kocak M, Cosgun Z, Bostanci IE, Kantarci M. 2022. Are we aware of radiation: a study about necessity of diagnostic X-ray exposure. World J Methodol 12(4): 264–273. https://doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i4.264. [Google Scholar]
Lee KL, Beveridge T, Sanagou M, Thomas P. 2020. Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT. J Med Radiat Sci 67(1): 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lell M, Kachelrieß M. 2023. Computed tomography 2.0: new detector technology, AI, and other developments. Invest Radiol 58(8): 587–601. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI0000000000000995. [Google Scholar]
Obed RI, Ekpo ME, Omojola AD, Abdulkadir MK. 2016. Medical physics professional development and education in Nigeria. Med Phys Int J 4: 2. http://mpijournal.org/pdf/2016-02/MPI-2016-02.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Paulo G, Damilakis J, Tsapaki V, Schegerer AA, Repussard J, Jaschke W, Frija G. 2020. Diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography: a literature review. Insights Imaging 11(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-020-00899-y. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, James K, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. 2016. Computed tomography and patient risk: facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol 8 (12): 902–915. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902. [Google Scholar]
Public Health England. 2022. National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). 11. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnosticradiologynationaldiagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/national-diagnostic-referencelevelsndrls#fnref:2 [Accessed 13 February 2024]. [Google Scholar]
Smith-Bindman R, Wang Y, Chu P, Chung R, Einstein AJ, Balcombe J, et al., 2019. International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study. BMJ 2(364): k4931. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4931. [Google Scholar]
Tan WS, Foley S, Ryan ML. 2023. Investigating CT head diagnostic reference levels based on indication-based protocols − a single site study. Radiography (Lond) 29(4): 786–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2023.05.003. [Google Scholar]
The Norwegian Radiation Protection Agency (NRPA). 2018. Representative doses in Norway − 2017 Results from reporting and auditing and the establishment of new national reference values. Radiation Protection Report, 3, Østerås. [Google Scholar]
UK Health Security Agency. 2019. National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) from 19 August 2019. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/ndrl. [Google Scholar]
Wachabauer D, R̈othlin F, Moshammer HM, Homolka P. 2020. Diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography in Austria: a 2018 nationwide survey on adult patients. Eur J Radiol 125: 108863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108863. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yadav H, Shah D, Sayed S, Horton S, Schroeder LF. 2021. Availability of essential diagnostics in ten low-income and middle-income countries: results from national health facility surveys. Lancet Global Health 9(11): e1553–e1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00442-3. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.