Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
Page(s) 9 - 19
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024024
Published online 14 March 2025
  • AAPM. 2002. Quality control in diagnostic radiology. Report of Task Group #12 Diagnostic X-ray Imaging Committee. AAPM Report No. 74. Madison. [Google Scholar]
  • Bertho J-M., Bourguignon M. 2023. La relation linéaire sans seuil (LNT) et l’évolution du système de radioprotection [The linear non-threshold (LNT) relationship and the evolution of the radiological protection system]. Radioprotection 58: 241–242. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bawazeer O, Saleem R, Alhazmi M, Asiri N, Mohammed T, Alsaab A, Algethami M, Sedayo A, Ajlouni A. 2022. Assessment of pediatric radiation doses in brain CT procedures. Radioprotection 57: 305–310. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bluekens AM, Veldkamp WJ, Schuur KH, Karssemeijer N, Broeders MJ, den Heeten GJ. 2015. The potential use of ultra-low radiation dose images in digital mammography − a clinical proof-of-concept study in craniocaudal views. British Journal of Radiology 88: 20140626. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. 2007. Computed tomography − an increasing source of radiation exposure. New England Journal of Medicine 357: 2277–2284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chambers CE, Awuor S. 2018. Reducing radiation dose: equipment, procedure, and operator Perfecting the Trifecta. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 92: 1237–1238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chartrand G, Cheng PM, Vorontsov E, Drozdzal M, Turcotte S, Pal CJ, Tang A. 2017. Deep learning: a primer for radiologists. Radiographics 37: 2113–2131. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dance DR, Christofides S, Maidment ADA, McLean ID, Ng KH. 2014. Diagnostic radiology physics. In: Diagnostic Radiology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students (IAEA, Eds). IAEA, Vienna, pp. 1-1. [Google Scholar]
  • Delis H, Christaki K, Healy B, Loreti G, Poli GL, Toroi P, Meghzifene A. 2017. Moving beyond quality control in diagnostic radiology and the role of the clinically qualified medical physicist. Physica Medica 41: 104–108. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eberhard M, Alkadhi H. 2020. Machine learning and deep neural networks: applications in patient and scan preparation, contrast medium, and radiation dose optimization. Journal of Thoracic Imaging 35(Suppl 1): S17– S20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • EC. 2012. Criteria for Acceptability of Medical Radiological Equipment used in Diagnostic Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy, Radiation Protection No. 162. Luxemburg. [Google Scholar]
  • El Mansouri M, Sekkat H, Talbi M et al. 2024. FMECA process analysis for managing the failures of 16-Slice CT scanner. J Fail Anal Prevenv 24: 436–442. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • El Mansouri M, Talbi M, Choukri A, Nhila O, Aabid M. 2022. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels for adult computed tomography in Morocco. Radioprotection 57: 61–66. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • El Mansouri M, Talbi M, Khatar Z, Nhila O, Sekkat H, Tahiri Z. 2024. Assessing the influence of X-ray spectrum on image quality in abdominal computed tomography scans. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids. DOI: 10.1080/10420150.2024.2332208 [Google Scholar]
  • El Mansouri M, Talbi M, Tahiri Z, et al. 2023. Application of the Pareto tool for the analysis of CT scanner failures. J Fail Anal Prevent 23: 2039–2043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • EFOMP. 2015. Quality control in digital mammography. EFOMP Mammo Working Group, EFOMP. [Google Scholar]
  • Gingold EL. 2017. The medical physicist’s role in radiation optimization. J Am Coll Radiol 14: 1335–1336. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Gollub MJ, Arya S, Zhu H. 2017. The role of imaging in the human microbiome. J Magn Resonance Imag 45: 320–326. [Google Scholar]
  • Greffier J, Bigand E, Hornbeck A, Etard C, Salvat C. 2017. Rapport SFPM n°32 sur les Niveaux de Référence en Radiologie Interventionnelle. [Google Scholar]
  • Greffier J, Frandon J, Pereira F, Hamard A, Beregi JP, Larbi A, Omoumi P. 2020. Optimization of radiation dose for CT detection of lytic and sclerotic bone lesions: a phantom study. Eur Radiol 30: 1075–1078. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • HERCA. 2020. CT Manufacturer’s Voluntary Commitment Regarding CT Dose to HERCA Working Group “Medical Application”/Sub-Working Group “CT Manufacturers? involvement.” 2010. Retrieved from https://www.french-nuclear-safety.fr/Media/Files/CT-Manufacturer-s-Voluntary-Commitment. [Google Scholar]
  • Housni A, ES-Samssar O, Saoud B, El Amrani N, Malou M, Amazian K, Essahlaoui A, Labzour A. 2023. Radiation protection in the operating room: Need for training, qualification and accompaniment for the professionals. Radioprotection 58: 37–42. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2007. Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice, Technical Reports Series No. 457 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2011. Quality Assurance Programme for Digital Mammography, Human Health Series No. 17 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2011. Status of Computed Tomography Dosimetry for Wide Cone Beam Scanners, Human Health Reports No. 5 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2012. Quality Assurance Programme for Computed Tomography: Diagnostic and Therapy Applications, Human Health Series No. 19 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2013. Roles and Responsibilities, and Education and Training Requirements for Clinically Qualified Medical Physicists, Human Health Series No. 25 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2014. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2015. Worldwide Implementation of Digital Imaging in Radiology, Human Health Series No. 28 Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2018. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation, IAEA Safety Standards Series No. SSG-46. Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2021. Guidelines for the Certification of Clinically Qualified Medical Physicists: Endorsed by the International Medical Physics Certification Board (IMPCB) and the International Organization for Medical Physics (IOMP). Vienna: IAEA. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 117. 2010. Radiological Protection in Fluoroscopically Guided Procedures outside the Imaging Department. Ann ICR P 40. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 135. 2017. Diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46 (1). [Google Scholar]
  • ISO. 2015. Quality Management Systems-Fundamentals and Vocabulary (ISO 9000:2015). ISO Copyright office. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones AK, Balter S, Rauch P, Wagner LK. 2014. Medical imaging using ionizing radiation: optimization of dose and image quality in fluoroscopy. Med Phys 41: 014301. [Google Scholar]
  • Jones AK, Heintz P, Geiser W, Goldman L, Jerjian K, Martin M, Peck D, Pfeiffer D, Ranger N, Yorkston, J. 2015. Ongoing quality control in digital radiography: report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 151. Med Phys 42: 6658–6670. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Körner M, Weber CH, Wirth S, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser MF, Treitl M. 2007. Advances in digital radiography: physical principles and system overview. Radiographics 27: 675–686. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khallouqi A, Halimi A, El rhazouani F O, S Mesradi MR, El Mansouri K, Sekkat H. 2024. Comparing tissue-equivalent properties of polyester and epoxy resins with PMMA material using Gate/Geant4 simulation toolkit. Radiat Phys Chem 220: 111702. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kortesniemi M, Tsapaki V, Trianni A, Russo P, Maas A, Källman HE, Brambilla M, Damilakis J. 2018. The European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics (EFOMP) White Paper: Big data and deep learning in medical imaging and in relation to the medical physics profession. Phys Med 56: 90–93. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu B, Hirsch JA, Li X, Sheridan RM, Rehani MM, Zheng H, Rabinov JD. 2019. Radiation dose monitoring for fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: effect on patient radiation exposure. Radiology 290: 744–749. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mathews JD, Forsythe AV, Brady Z, Butler MW, Goergen SK, Byrnes GB, Giles GG. 2013. Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians. BMJ 346: f 2360. [Google Scholar]
  • MirDerikvand A, Bagherzadeh S, MohammadSharifi A. 2023. Evaluation of awareness and knowledge of CT technologist regarding diagnostic reference levels in Iran. Radioprotection 58: 299–302. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Moores BM, Watkinson AS, Henshaw ET, Pearcy BJ. 1991. Quality control in diagnostic radiology. Advances in radiation protection. 1st ed. Brussels and Luxembourg: Kluwer Academic Publishers 209–36. [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council. 2006. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. [Google Scholar]
  • NCRP Report No 160. 2009. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Bethesda, MD: NCRP. [Google Scholar]
  • NCRP Report No 184. 2019. Medical Radiation Exposure of Patients in the United States. Bethesda, MD: NCRP. [Google Scholar]
  • Nhila O, Talbi M, Youssoufi M, El Mansouri M, Tahiri Z, Chakir E, Azougagh M. 2023. Etablissement de niveaux de référence diagnostiques locaux pour les protocoles de tomodensitométrie en radiothérapie du cancer du sein dans un seul centre marocain. Radioprotection. DOI: 10.1051/radiopro/2023047 [Google Scholar]
  • Panick C, Wunderle K, Sands M, Martin C. 2018. Patient radiation dose reduction considerations in a contemporary interventional radiology suite. Cardiovasc Interven Radiol 41: 1925–1934. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Parakh A, Kortesniemi M, Schindera ST. 2016. CT radiation dose management: a comprehensive optimization process for improving patient safety. Radiology 280: 663–673. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Part NG. 2011. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources International Basic Safety Standards. [Google Scholar]
  • Rehani MM. 2015. Dose surveys and DRLs: critical look and way forward. Radiat Protect Dosimetry 165: 67–69. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schindelin J, Rueden CT, Hiner MC, Eliceiri KW. 2015. The ImageJ ecosystem: an open platform for biomedical image analysis. Mol Reproduct Dev 82: 518–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sekkat H, El Mansouri K, Khallouqi A, Halimi A, El rhazouani O. 2024. Advancing pediatric head CT dose prediction: correlating patient size metrics with AP and LAT dimensions in Moroccan population. Radiat Effects Defects Solids. DOI: 10.1080/10420150.2024.2335240 [Google Scholar]
  • Sekkat H, Elmansouri K, Khallouqi A, Halimi A, El Rhazouani O, Tahiri Z, Talbi M, El Mansouri M. 2024. Characterizing pediatric head patient size in Moroccan population: establishing age-dependent relationships for accurate CT dose estimation. Radioprotection. DOI: 10.1051/radiopro/2024017 [Google Scholar]
  • Sensakovic WF, Warden 4th DR, Bancroft LW. 2017. The link between radiation optimization and quality. J Am Coll Radiol 14: 850–851. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.03.020 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Smith-Bindman R, Kwan ML, Marlow EC, Theis MK, Bolch W, Cheng SY, Miglioretti DL. 2019. Trends in use of medical imaging in US Health Care Systems and in Ontario, Canada, 2000–2016. JAMA 322: 843–856. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tahiri Z, Talbi M, El Mansouri M. 2022. Evaluation of Moroccan physician’s knowledge about radiation doses and risks from pediatric computed tomography. Radioprotection 57: 123–126. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tahiri Z, Talbi M, El Mansouri M, Sekkat H, Mkimel M, Nhila O, Essendoubi M, Hiroual S. 2024. Radiation exposure in routine mammography screening: a large observational cross-sectional study in Morocco. Radioprotection 59: 104–110. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Talbi M, Khalis M, Sebihi R, Nhila O, El Mansouri M, Chakir E, Tahiri Z. 2022. Analysis of half-value layer and average glandular dose for mammography using gate. Moscow University Physics Bulletin 76(Supplement): S95–S102. [Google Scholar]
  • Talbi M, Tahiri Z, Eddaoui K, El Mansouri M, Nhila O, Benmessaoud M, Ait Ouaggou I, Chakir E, Sebihi R, Khalis M. 2022. Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs) for routine X-ray examinations in Morocco. Radioprotection 57: 149–155. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsapaki V. 2020. Radiation dose optimization in diagnostic and interventional radiology: current issues and future perspectives. Phys Med 79: 16–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsapaki V, Balter S, Cousins C, Holmberg O, Miller DL, Miranda P, Rehani M, Vano E. 2018. The International Atomic Energy Agency action plan on radiation protection of patients and staff in interventional procedures: Achieving change in practice. Phys Med 52: 56–64. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2008. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Volume I: Annex A − Medical Radiation Exposures. Report to the General Assembly. New York: United Nations, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • West J. 2000. Quality management principles. Qual Progr 33: 79. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO. 1982. Quality Assurance in Diagnostic Radiology. Geneva: WHO. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO. 2006. Quality of care: a process for making strategic choices in health systems. World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.