Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
Page(s) 20 - 27
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024037
Published online 14 March 2025
  • Behan M, Haworth P, Colley P, Brittain M, Hince A, Clarke M, Ghuran A, Saha M, Hildick-Smith D. 2010. Decreasing operators’ radiation exposure during coronary procedures: the transradial radiation protection board. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 76 (1): 79–84. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bertho J, Geryes B. 2023. La radioprotection est une attitude. Radioprotection 58: 77–78. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • D’Avino V, Angrisani L, La Verde G, Pugliese M, Raulo A, Sabatino G, Coppola F. 2019. New eye lens dose limit: status of knowledge in Campania hospitals. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(18). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Domienik J, Bissinger A, Grabowicz W, Jankowski Ł, Kręcki R, Makowski M, Masiarek K, Plewka M, Lubiński A, Peruga JZ. 2016. The impact of various protective tools on the dose reduction in the eye lens in an interventional cardiology-clinical study. J Radiolog Protect. 36(2). [Google Scholar]
  • Fetterly KA, Magnuson DJ, Tannahill GM, Hindal MD, Mathew V. 2011. Effective use of radiation shields to minimize operator dose during invasive cardiology procedures. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 4: 1133–1139. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jia Q, Chen Z, Jiang X, Zhao Z, Huang M, Li J, Zhuang J, Liu X, Hu T, Liang W. 2017. Operator radiation and the efficacy of ceiling-suspended lead screen shielding during coronary angiography: an anthropomorphic phantom study using real-time dosimeters. Sci Rep 7: 42077. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu F, Raja, You Z, Wang J, Li W, Wu Y, Suthakorn W, Liao L. 2023. Effect of new radioprotective equipment on reducing radiation exposure of participants in percutaneous coronary intervention. Radioprotection 58: 91–98. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu F, Wang J, Liu X, Huang Y, Deng Q, Ou Y, Liao L. 2018. Effect of optimizing nursing process on reducing radiation exposure of interventional nurses during emergency coronary stenting. Chin J Radiat Med Protect 38: 617–620. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee Y, Lee WJ, Jin YW, Jang S. 2021. Interventional radiologists have a higher rate of chromosomal damage due to occupational radiation exposure: a dicentric chromosome assay. Eur Radiol 31: 8256–8263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ma W, Ma H, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang H, Wang S, Wang Q, Wang L, Fang K, Bai J, Bai X, Feng J, Ning X, Ren X, Liu G, An Y, Su X, Li X, Li P, Zhang X. Zhang D, Chen L, Zhao M, Hu Z, Hu S, Gao Y, Rao C, Guo Q, Wen N, Xie Y, Zhai M, Xue Y, Yin C, Yang N, Shi Y. 2021. Summary of the China Cardiovascular Disease Healthcare Quality Report 2021. Chinese Journal of Circulation. 36 (11):1041-1064. [Google Scholar]
  • Monzen H, Tamura M, Shimomura K, Onishi Y, Nakayama S, Fujimoto T, Matsumoto K, Hanaoka K, Kamomae T. 2017. A novel radiation protection device based on tungsten functional paper for application in interventional radiology. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18: 215–220. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Papp C, Romano-Miller M, Descalzo A, Michelin S, Molinari A, Rossini A, Plotkin C, Bodino G, Esperanza G, Di Giorgio M, Touzet R. 2017. Results of relid study 2014-Buenos Aires, Argentina retrospective evaluation of lens injuries and dose. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 173: 212–217. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rajaraman P, Doody MM, Yu CL, Preston DL, Miller JS, Sigurdson AJ, Freedman DM, Alexander BH, Little MP, Miller DL, Linet MS. 2016. Cancer risks in U.S. radiologic technologists working with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures, 1994-2008. Am J Roentgenol 206 (5). [Google Scholar]
  • Uwineza A, Kalligeraki AA, Hamada N, Jarrin M, Quinlan RA. 2019. Cataractogenic load − a concept to study the contribution of ionizing radiation to accelerated aging in the eye lens. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res 779: 68–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ullery BW, Landau B, Wang GJ, Faifrman RM, Woo EY. 2014. Radiation dose to the interventionalist is directly affected by the operating position. Vascular 22: 149–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhao R, Wu J, Yu J, Liao Z, Zhou Z, Yang Y. 2017. Study on the inverse square law of X-ray radiation field. Nucl Sci Eng 37: 482–486. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang L, Zhu J, Min N, Lu F, Chen Y. 2011. Estimation of effective dose to radiation workers in 3 common interventions. Chin J Radiat Med Protect 31: 391–394. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.