Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 28 - 36 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024031 | |
| Published online | 14 March 2025 | |
- Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer J-C, Schnyder P, Trueb PR, Valley J-F, Vock P, Verdun FR. 2007. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol 17(6): 1621–1633 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arthur WR, Dhawan J, Norell MS, Hunter AJ, Clark AL. 2002. Does cardiologist- or radiographer-operated fluoroscopy and image acquisition influence optimization of patient radiation exposure during routine coronary angiography? Br J Radiol 75: 748–753. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damilakis J, Vassileva J. 2021. The growing potential of diagnostic reference levels as a dynamic tool for dose optimization. Phys Med 84(April): 285–287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kicken PJH, Kemerink G, van Engelshoven J. 1999. Patient dosimetry in arteriography of the lower limbs. Part I: Quantification of exposure. Radiat. Protect. Dosimetry 81(January): 25–36. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kim KP, Miller DL, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Balter S, Kleinerman RA, Ostroumova E, Simon SL, Linet MS. 2012. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing fluoroscopically-guided procedures. Health Phys 103: 80. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laura. 2015. ‘NCRP Report 160 - NCRP | Bethesda, MD’. 29 May 2015. https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-160/. [Google Scholar]
- Li X, Hirsch JA, Rehani MM, Yang K, Liu B. 2020. Effective dose assessment for patients undergoing contemporary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol 214: 158–170. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Loose RW, Vano E, Mildenberger P, Tsapaki V, Caramella D, Sjöberg J, Paulo G et al. 2021. Radiation dose management systems-requirements and recommendations for users from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging Initiative. Eur Radiol 31(4): 2106–2114 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin CJ. 2007. The importance of radiation quality for optimisation in radiology. Biomed Imag Intervent J 3(2): e38. [Google Scholar]
- Ministério da Saúde, IN / No 91. 2021. ‘INSTRUÇÃO NORMATIVA - IN No 91, DE 27 DE MAIO DE 2021 - DOU - Imprensa Nacional Fluoroscopia.Pdf - Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares’. 2021. https://www.gov.br/ebserh/pt-br/hospitais-universitarios/regiao-sul/hu-ufsc/acesso-a-informacao/participacao-social/comissoes-comites-nucleos-equipes-e-grupos-de-trabalho/comissao-de-protecao-radiologica-riscos-hu-ufsc-ebserh/instrucao-normativa-in-no-91-de-27-de-maio-de-2021-dou-imprensa-nacional-fluoroscopia.pdf/view. [Google Scholar]
- NCRP Report 160 - NCRP | Bethesda, MD. n.d. Accessed 2 May 2024. https://ncrponline.org/publications/reports/ncrp-report-160-2/. [Google Scholar]
- Olcay A, Guler E, Karaca IO, Omaygenc MO, Kizilirmak F, Olgun E, Yenipinar E, Cakmak HA, Duman D. 2015. Comparison of fluoro and cine coronary angiography: balancing acceptable outcomes with a reduction in radiation dose. J Invas Cardiol 27(4): 199–202 [Google Scholar]
- Pyne CT, Gadey G, Jeon C, Piemonte T, Waxman S, Resnic F. 2014. Effect of reduction of the pulse rates of fluoroscopy and CINE-acquisition on X-ray dose and angiographic image quality during invasive cardiovascular procedures. Circulat Cardiovasc Interv 7(4): 441–446 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Riccardi L, De Monte F, Cretti F, Pini S, Zucca S, Quattrocchi MG, Origgi D et al. 2018. Use of radiation dose index monitoring software in a multicenter environment for CT dose optimization. La Radiolog Med 123(12): 944–951 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Semghouli S, El Hamidi L, Aabid M, Amaoui B. 2024. Evaluation of radiation dose and establishment of local DRLs for adult during abdominopelvic CT scan imaging for University Hospital Centers, Morocco. Radioprotection 59(1): 42–49 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Talbi M, Tahiri Z, Eddaoui K, El Mansouri M, Nhila O, Benmessaoud M, Ait Ouaggou I, Chakir E, Sebihi R, Khalis M. 2022. Local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) for routine X-ray examinations in Morocco. Radioprotection 57(2): 149–155 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Tapiovaara M, Siiskonen T. 2008. ’PCXMC 20 User’s Guide’. 978-952-478-393-4. Finland. [Google Scholar]
- The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103’. 2007. Ann ICRP 37(2–4): 1–332. [Google Scholar]
- Triedman JK, Newburger JW. 2016. Trends in congenital heart disease. Circulation 133): 2716–2733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- TulioGSMarques. (2024) 2024. ‘TulioGSMarques/Ocr_artiszee_report_extraction’. Jupyter Notebook. https://github.com/TulioGSMarques/ocr_artiszee_report_extraction. [Google Scholar]
- Vañó Carruana E, Fernández Soto JM, Sánchez Casanueva RM, Ten Morón JI. 2013. Niveles de Referencia de Dosis En Radiología Intervencionista. Radiología 55(December): 17–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, Ortiz-López P et al. 2017. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Ann ICRP 46): 1–144. [Google Scholar]
- Wambani JS, Korir GK, Tries MA, Korir IK, Sakwa JM. 2014. Patient radiation exposure during general fluoroscopy examinations. J Appl Clin Med Phys 15(2): 4555. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.