Les démarches d’implication des parties prenantes dans la gestion des situations post-accidentelles − quels enseignements pour la préparation ?

Open Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 55, Number 2, April-June 2020


Page(s)		95 - 105
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020051
Published online		30 June 2020

Ando R. 2016. Measuring, discussing, and living together: lessons from 4 years in Suetsugi. Ann. ICRP 45(1S): 75–83. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ando R. 2018. Trust-what connects science to daily life. Health Phys. 115(5): 581–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Averin V. 2016. Belarus’ experience in post-Chernobyl communication with the local population, and some lessons learnt from involvement in the NERIS-TP project. Radioprotection 51(HS1): S43–S45. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Ban N. 2016. Japanese experience in stakeholder involvement: ICRP dialogue meetings. Radioprotection 51(HS1): S51–S53. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Baudé S, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Eikelmann I-M, Boilley B, Schneider T. 2016. Local populations facing long-term consequences of nuclear accidents: lessons learnt from Chernobyl and Fukushima. Radioprotection 51(HS2): S155–S158. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bertho J-M, Maître M, Croüail P, Naito W, Shkliarava N, Mostovenko A, Jones K, Simon-Cornu M. 2019. Assessment of population radiation exposure at the edge of the exclusion zone 32 years after the Chernobyl accident: methods and preliminary results. Radioprotection 54(4): 247–257. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bottollier-Depois JF, Allain E, Baumont G, Berthelot N, Darley G, Ecrabet F, Jolivet T, Lebeau-Live A, Lejeune V, Queinnec F, Simon C, Trompier F. 2019. The OpenRadiation project: monitoring radioactivity in the environment by and for the citizens. Radioprotection 54(4): 241–246. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Charron S, Lafage S, Van Asselt E, Baptista M, Van Bourgondiën M, Brandhoff P, Cabianca T, Camps J, Cessac B, Croüail P, Durand V, Gallego E, GiL O, Holmes S, Hourdakis C, Jones K, Kamenopoulou V, Lecomte J-F, Liland A, Lopes I, Madruga M-J, Martins J-O, Mc Mahon C, Montero M, Murith C, Olyslaegers G, Organo C, Paiva I, Peltonen T, Portugal L, Potiriadis C, Prades A, Reis M, Rossignol N, Schneider T, Sala R, Smith V, Tafili V, Teles P, Tomkiv Y, Trueba C, Turcanu C, Turtiainen T, Twenhöfel C, Vaz P. 2016. Overview of the PREPARE WP3: management of contaminated goods in post-accidental situation − Synthesis of European stakeholders’ panels. Radioprotection 51(HS2): S83–S91. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
CODIRPA. 2012. Éléments de doctrine pour la gestion post-accidentelle d’un accident nucléaire. ASN. Available from https://www.asn.fr/Media/Files/00-PNGMDR/Elements-de-doctrine-pour-la-gestion-post-accidentelle-d-un-accident-nucleaire. [Google Scholar]
Dewoghélaëre J, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Guillevic J, Baudé S. 2019. Critical evaluation/remediation pathways. CONCERT deliverable 9.69. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/129/D9.69_Critical%20evaluation_remediation%20pathways_approved03072019.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
Fassert C. 2020. L’accident nucléaire de Fukushima : enjeux et contestations autour de la définition du zonage. Radioprotection 55(1): 29–38. Available from https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020005. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Fattibene P, Della Monaca S, Liutsko L, Sarukhan A, Oughton D, Tomkiv Y, Cardis E, Nuccetelli C, De Angelis C. 2020. Tutorials for apps and tools, including database management plan. CONCERT deliverable 9.139. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/197/D9.139_Tutorials%20for%20apps%20and%20tools,%20including%20database%20management%20plan_approved08012020.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
Gallego E, Montero M. 2016. Experience in Spain with local-national fora for better post-accident preparedness. Radioprotection 51(HS1): S31–S34. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Hasegawa A, Ohira T, Maeda M, Yasumura S, Tanigawa K. 2016. Emergency responses and health consequences after the Fukushima accident, evacuation and relocation. Clin. Oncol. 28(4): 237–244. [Google Scholar]
ICRP Publication 111. 2009. Application of the commission’s recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency. Ann. ICRP 39(3). [Google Scholar]
Kuroda Y, Iwasa H, Orui M, Moriyama N, Nakayama C, Yasumura S. 2018. Association between health literacy and radiation anxiety among residents after a nuclear accident: comparison between evacuated and non-evacuated areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(7): 1463. [Google Scholar]
Kotoba. 2015. Dialogues in Fukushima. The story of four years of dialogue for the rehabilitation of living conditions in the areas contaminated by the Fukushima accident. Web documentary. Available from http://www.fukushima-dialogues.com. [Google Scholar]
Lochard J, Schneider T, Ando R, Niwa O, Clement C, Lecomte JF, Tada JI. 2019. An overview of the dialogue meetings initiated by ICRP in Japan after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 54(2): 87–101. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Maître M, Croüail P, Schneider T. 2018. Organisation of the environmental monitoring: lessons learnt from Fukushima. In: 5th European IRPA Congress Proceedings, pp. 233–238. Available from https://irpa2018europe.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IRPA2018-Proceedings-v2sec.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Maître M, Croüail P, Lafranque E, Schneider T, Charron S, Leroyer V, Paulmaz P. 2019. Stakeholders panels results/France. CONCERT deliverable 9.66. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/132/D9.66_Stakeholders%20panels%20results-France_approved04072019.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
Montero M, Trueba C, Sala R. 2019. Compilation of national stakeholders panels reports. CONCERT deliverable 9.22. [Google Scholar]
Montero M, Sala R, Maître M, Durand V, Nunes-Marques P, Reis M, Crouaïl P, Trueba C, Paiva I, Gil OM, Schneider T. 2020. Guidelines and recommendations for decision making during the transition phase. CONCERT deliverable 9.24. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/207/D9.24_Guidelines%20and%20recommendations%20for%20decision%20making%20during%20the%20transition%20phase_approved21022020.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
Naito W, Uesaka M, Yamada C, Kurosawa T, Yasutaka T, Ishii H. 2016. Relationship between individual external doses, ambient dose rates and individuals’ activity-patterns in affected areas in Fukushima following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. PLoS One 11(8): e0158879. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nisbet AF, Andersson KG, Duranova T. 2010. Demonstration of generic handbooks for assisting in the management of contaminated food production systems and inhabited areas in Europe. Radioprotection 45(5): 243–249. [Google Scholar]
Nishikawa Y, Tsubokura M, Yamazaki S. 2016. Healthcare delivery to a repopulated village after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: a case of Kawauchi village, Fukushima, Japan. Jpn. Med. Assoc. J. 59(4): 159–161. [Google Scholar]
OMS. 1948. Constitutions de l’Organisation mondiale de la santé. Available from https://www.who.int/fr/about/who-we-are/constitution. [Google Scholar]
Raskob W, Schneider T, Gering F, Charron S, Zheleznyak M, Andronopoulos S, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Camps J. 2016. Innovative integrative tools and platforms. Key results of the PREPARE European Project. Radioprotection 51(HS2): S59–S61. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Rollinger F, Lochard J, Schneider T. 2016. Lessons learnt by IRSN about the involvement of experts towards the population in contaminated areas in Fukushima prefecture. Ann. ICRP 45(2S): 99–104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Schneider T, Maître M, Lochard J, Charron S, Lecomte JF, Ando R, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, Kuroda J, Miyazaki M, Naito W, Orita M, Takamura N, Tanigawa K, Tsubokura M, Tasutaka T. 2019. The role of radiological protection experts in stakeholder involvement in the recovery phase of post-nuclear accident situations: some lessons from the Fukushima-Daiichi NPP accident. Radioprotection 54(2): 259–271. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
SHAMISEN Partners. 2017. Recommendations and procedures for preparedness and health surveillance of populations affected by a radiation accident. Available from https://radiation.isglobal.org/shamisen/. [Google Scholar]
SHAMISEN-SINGS Partners. 2020. Mobile apps for monitoring radiation doses, health and welfare in the context of a nuclear or radiological accident. Guidelines and recommendations for users, developers and public authorities. Available from https://radiation.isglobal.org/shamisen-sings/booklets/. [Google Scholar]
TERRITORIES Partners. 2020a. Guidance for management/post-accident recommendations based on output of the TERRITORIES project. CONCERT deliverable 9.71. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/208/D9.71_Guidance%20for%20management-Post-Accident_approved21022020.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
TERRITORIES Partners. 2020b. Guidance for management − NORM Recommendations based on output of the TERRITORIES project. CONCERT deliverable 9.72. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/209/D9.72_Guidance%20for%20management%20and%20NORM_approved21022020.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]
The Japan Times. 2018. Tepco’s compensation for 3/11 victims has made matters worse for many. Article of 13 avril 2018. [Google Scholar]
Tsubokura M. 2018. Secondary health issues associated with the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident, based on the experiences of Soma and Minamisoma Cities. J. Natl. Inst. Public Health 67(1): 71–83. [Google Scholar]
Turcanu C, Abelshausen B, Geysmans R, Van Oudheusden M, Meskens G, Schieber C, Schneider T, Zeleznik N, Pölzl-Viol C, Perko T, Fallon C, Duranova T, Cantone M-C, Murith C, Barazza F, Economides S, Liutsko L, Gschwind R, Charron S, Savu D. 2019. Final report of the ENGAGE project. CONCERT deliverable 9.94. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/Document.ashx?dt=web&file=/Lists/Deliverables/Attachments/199/D9.94_Final%20report%20of%20the%20ENGAGE%20project_approved13012020.pdf&guid=01b5ac77-b2ec-4cda-9c98-917dba396f0f. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.