Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 55, Number 2, April - June 2020
Page(s) 123 - 134
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020006
Published online 27 March 2020
  • Akhlaghi P, Miri-Hakimabad H, Rafat-Motavalli L. 2015. Dose estimation in reference and non-reference pediatric patients undergoing computed tomography examinations: A Monte Carlo study. Radioprotection 50: 43–54. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Alaei P, Gerbi BJ, Geise RA. 2000. Evaluation of a model-based treatment planning system for dose computations in the kilovoltage energy range. Med. Phys. 27: 2821–2826. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Amis ES. 2011. CT Radiation Dose; Trending in the Right Direction. Radiology 261: 5–8. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Boivin J, Tomic N, Fadallah B, DeBlois F, Devic S. 2011. Reference dosimetry during diagnostic CT examination using XR-QA radiochromic film model. Med. Phys. 38: 5119–5129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bordy JM, Bessieres I, d’Agostino E, Domingo C, d’Errico F, di Fulvio A, Knezevic Z, Miljanic S, Olko P, Ostrowsky A, Poumarede B, Sorel S, Stolarczyk L, Vermesse D. 2013. Radiotherapy out-of-field dosimetry: Experimental and computational results for photons in a water tank. Radiat. Meas. 57: 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  • Chao TC, Bozkurt A, Xu XG. 2001. Conversion coefficients based on the VIP-Man anatomical model and EGS4. Health Phys. 81: 163–183. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coakley FV, Gould R, Yeh BM, Arenson RL. 2010. CT Radiation Dose: What can you do right now in your practice ? AJR 196: 619–625. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deak P, van Straten M, Shrimpton PC, Zankl M, Kalender WA. 2008. Validation of a Monte Carlo tool for patient specific dose simulations in multi-slice computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 18: 759–772. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, Cody DD, Stevens DM, Mc Collough CH, O’Daniel J, McNitt-Gray MF. 2005. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): Cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. Phys. Med. Biol. 50: 3989–4004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dixon RL, Ballard AC. 2007. Experimental validation of a versatile system of CT dosimetry using a conventional ion chamber: Beyond CTDI [sub 100]. Med. Phys. 34: 3399–3413. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Habib Geryes B, Hornbeck A, Jarrige V, Pierrat N, Ducou Le Pointe H, Dreuil S. 2019. Patient dose evaluation in computed tomography: A French national study based on clinical indications. Phys. Med. 61: 18–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. 2009. Tables of X-ray mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients from 1 kev to 20 Mev for elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 additional substances of dosimetric interest. Available from http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xraycoef/index.cfm. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. Technical Reports Series no. 457. 2007. Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: An international code of practice. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann. ICRP 37: 1–332. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 110. 2009. Adult reference computational phantoms. Ann. ICRP 39: 1–162. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
  • ISO/IEC Guide 98-3. 2008. Uncertainty of measurement – Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM: 1995). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 100. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarry G, DeMarco JJ, Beifuss U, Cagnon CH, McNittGray MF. 2003. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: From phantom testing to patient specific models. Phys. Med. Biol. 48: 2645–2663. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Journy NMY, Lee C, Harbron RW, McHugh K, Pearce MS, Berrington de Gonzales A. 2017a. Projected cancer risks potentially related to past, current, and future practices in paedriatric CT in the United Kingdom 1990–2020. Br. J. Cancer 116: 109–116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Journy NMY, Dreuil S, Boddaert N, Chateil J-F, Defez D, Ducou-le-Pointe H, Garcier J-M, Guersen J, Habib Geryes B, Jahnen A, Lee C, Payen-de-la-Garanderie J, Pracros J-P, Sirinelli D, Thierry-chef I, Bernier M-O. 2017b. Individual radiation exposure from computed tomography: A survey of paediatric practice in French university hospitals, 2010–2013. Eur. Radiol. 28: 1432–1084. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalender WA. 2014. Dose in X-ray computed tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 59: R129–R150. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalender WA, Schmidt B, Zankl M, Schmidt M. 1999. A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography. Eur. Radiol. 9: 555–562. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li X, Segars wP, Surgeaon GM, Colsher JG, Toncheva G, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP. 2011. Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: Part I. Development and validation of a Monte Carlo program. Med. Phys. 38: 397–407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Long DIJ, Lee C, Tien C, Fisher R, Hoerner MR, Hintenlang D, Boch WE. 2013. Monte Carlo simulations of adult and pediatric computed tomography exams: Validation studies of organ doses with physical phantoms. Med. Phys. 40: 013901-1–013901-10. [Google Scholar]
  • Mayo-Smith WW, Hara AK, Mahesh M, Sahani DV, Pavlicek W. 2014. How I Do It: Managing Radiation Dose in CT. Radiology 273: 657–672. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF. 2011. CT Dose Index and Patient Dose: They are not the same thing. Radiology 259: 311–316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rampado O, Garelli E, Deagostini S, Ropolo R. 2006. Dose and energy dependence of response of gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Phys. Med. Biol. 51: 2871–2881. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sempau J, Fernandez-Varea JM, Acosta E, Salvat F. 2003. Experimental benchmarks of the Monte Carlo code Penelope. Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 207: 107–123. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sodickson S. 2012. Strategies for reducing radiation exposure in multi-detector row CT. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 50: 1–14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tomic N, Quintero C, Whiting BR, Aldelaijan S, Bekerat H, Liang L, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J, Devic S. 2014. Characterization of calibration curves and energy dependence GafChromic™ XR-QA2 model based radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med. Phys. 41: 062105. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Turner AC, Zhang D, Kim HJ, De Marco JJ, Cagnon CH, Angel E, Cody DD, Stevens DM, Primark AN, McCollough CH, McNitt-Gray MF. 2009. A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations. Med. Phys. 36: 2154–2164. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yukihara EG, McKeever SWS. 2008. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry in medicine. Phys. Med. Biol. 53: R351–R379. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang D, Zankl M, DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, Angel E, Turner AC, McNitt-Gray MF. 2009. Reducing radiation dose to selected organs by selecting the tube start angle in MDCT helical scans: A Monte Carlo based study. Med. Phys. 36: 5654–5664. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang Y, Li X, Segars W, Samei E. 2012. Organ doses, effective doses, and risk indices in adult CT: Comparison of four types of reference phantoms across different examination protocols. Med. Phys. 36: 3404–3423. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.