EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 51 / No 4 (October-December 2016) Radioprotection, 51 4 (2016) 231-235 References
Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 51, Number 4, October-December 2016
Page(s) 231 - 235
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2016031
Published online 12 December 2016
  • Alonzo F., Hertel-Aas T., Réal A., Lance E., Garcia-Sanchez L., Bradshaw C., Vives i Batlle J., Oughton D.H., Garnier-Laplace J. (2016) Population modelling to compare chronic external radiotoxicity between individual and population endpoints in four taxonomic groups, J. Environ. Radioact. 152, 46-59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Beresford N., Brown J., Copplestone D., Garnier-Laplace J., Howard B.J., Larsson C.-M., Oughton O., Pröhl G., Zinger I. (eds.) (2007) D-ERICA : An integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risks from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application. Contract Number : FI6R-CT-2003-508847. [Google Scholar]
  • Boyer C., Gontier G., Hémidy P.Y. (2016) Radioprotection de l’environnement : méthodologie et retour d’expérience d’EDF. Radioprotection 51 (4), 237-244. [Google Scholar]
  • Bradshaw C., Kapustka L., Barnthouse L., Brown J., Ciffroy P., Forbes V., Geras’kin S., Kautsky U., Bréchignac F. (2014) Using an ecosystem approach to complement protection schemes based on organism-level endpoints, J. Environ. Radioact. 136, 98-104. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Conseil de l’Union Européenne (2014) Directive 2013/59/Euratom du Conseil de l’Union Européenne du 5 décembre 2013 fixant les normes de base relatives à la protection sanitaire contre les dangers résultant de l’exposition aux rayonnements ionisantset abrogeant les directives 89/618/Euratom, 90/641/Euratom, 96/29/Euratom, 97/43/Euratom et 2003/122/Euratom. Publié le 17 janvier 2014 au JOUE. [Google Scholar]
  • Copplestone D., Bielby S., Jones S.R., Patton D., Daniel D., Gize I. (2001) Impact Assessment of Ionising Radiation on Wildlife. Environment Agency, Bristol. [Google Scholar]
  • Copplestone D., Hingston J., Real A. (2008) The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database, J. Environ. Radioact. 99 (9), 1456-1463. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Environment Canada (2006) Liste des substances d’intérêt prioritaire – Rapport d’évaluation – Rejets de radionucléides des installations nucléaires (effets sur les espèces autres que l’être humain). Gouvernement du Canada, Québec. [Google Scholar]
  • Howard B.J., Beresford N.A., Andersson P., Brown J.E., Copplestone D., Beaugelin-Seiller K., Garnier-Laplace J., Howe P.D., Oughton D., Whitehouse P. (2010) Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context-an overview of the PROTECT coordinated action project, J. Radiol. Prot. 30 (2), 195-214. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Garnier-Laplace J., Della-Vedova C., Gilbin R., Copplestone D., Hingston J., Ciffroy P. (2006) First derivation of predicted-no-effect values for freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems exposed to radioactive substances, Environ. Sci. Tech. 40, 6498-6505. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (1992) Effects of ionizing radiation on plants and animals at levels implied by current protection standards. IAEA Technical report n° 332. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (2006) Fundamental Safety Principles. IAEA Safety Standards for protecting people and the environment. Safety Fundamentals SF-1. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (2014a) Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources : International Basic Safety Standards. General Safety Requirements Part 3 - No GSR Part 3. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (2014b) Summary notes from the Technical Meeting of the Coordination Group on Radiation Protection of the Environment : input to Safety Standards taking into account the BSS and relevant ICRP/international recommendations. IAEA, Vienna, 2–3 July 2013, April 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (2015) Determining the Suitability of Materials for Disposal at Sea under the London Convention 1972 and London Protocol 1996 : A Radiological Assessment Procedure. IAEA TECDOC 1759, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA (en préparation) Radiological Environmental Impact Assessment for Facilities and Activities, Draft Safety Standards DS427, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2002) Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection Reference Values. ICRP Publication 89, Ann. ICRP 32 (3-4). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103, Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2008) Environmental Protection – the Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants, ICRP Publication 108, Ann. ICRP 38 (4-6). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2009) Environmental Protection : Transfer Parameters for Reference Animals and Plants, ICRP Publication 114, Ann. ICRP 39 (6). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP (2014) Protection of the Environment Under Different Exposure Situations, ICRP Publication 124, Ann. ICRP 43 (1). [Google Scholar]
  • IRSN (2014a) Radioprotection de l’environnement – état de l’art et recommandations de l’IRSN. IRSN, fiche technique FT/AV/PRP-ENV/2014-019 support de l’avis IRSN/2014-000362. [Google Scholar]
  • IRSN (2014b). Avis IRSN/2014-000362 du 17 octobre 2014, http://www.irsn.fr/FR/expertise/avis/Pages/Avis-aux-autorites.aspx{#}.VvFlM6Nwa70. [Google Scholar]
  • Larsson C.-M. (2004) The FASSET Framework for assessment of environmental impact of ionising radiation in European ecosystems – an overview, Radiol. Prot. 24, A1-A12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR (1996) Source and effects of ionizing radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annex. United Nations, NY, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR (2014) Assessment of the impact of the 2011 nuclear accident in Japan (Scientific Annex A to the UNSCEAR 2013 Report to the UN General Assembly). [Google Scholar]
  • US-DOE (2002) A graded approach for evaluating radiation doses to aquatic and terrestrial biota. DOE Standard DOE-STD-1153-2002, 3 modules. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.