EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 50 / No 1 (Janvier-Mars 2015) Radioprotection, 50 1 (2015) 65-72 References
Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 50, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2015
Page(s) 65 - 72
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2014033
Published online 15 January 2015
  • Cassola V.F., Lima V.J.M., Kramer R., Khoury H.J. (2010) FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: I. Development of the anatomy, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 133-162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ebrahimi Khankook A., Miri Hakimabad H., Rafat Motavalli L. (2014) The feasibility study of using lung statistical phantoms to determine the uncertainty of the lung absorbed dose in broad beams incident of photons and neutrons, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. (Revised). [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrari P., Gualdrini G. (2005) An improved MCNP version of the NORMAN voxel phantom for dosimetry studies, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 4299-4316. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 23 (1975) Report on the Task Group on Reference Man, pp. 1-480. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 89 (2002) Basic Anatomical and Physiological Data for Use in Radiological Protection: Reference Values, pp. 1-265. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 110 (2009) Adult Reference Computational Phantom, pp. 1-165. Elsevier Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 116 (2010) Conversion Coefficients for Radiological Protection Quantities for External Radiation Exposures, pp. 1-257. Elsevier Inc. [Google Scholar]
  • Karimi Shahri K., Rafat Motavalli L., Miri Hakimabad H. (2013) Can the same dose data be estimated from phantoms with different anatomies? Radioprotection 48, 527-544. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R., Zankl M., Williams G., Drexler G. (1982) The calculation of dose from external photon exposures using reference human phantoms and Monte Carlo methods: Part I. The male (ADAM) and female (EVA) adult mathematical phantoms GSF-Report S-885 (Neuherberg-Muenchen: Institut fuer Strahlenschutz, GSF-Forschungszentrum fuer Umwelt und Gesundheit) (reprint July 1999). [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R., Vieira J.W., Khoury H.J., Lima F.R.A., Fuelle D. (2003) All about MAX: a male adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculations in radiation protection dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 1239-1262. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R., Khoury H.J., Vieira J.W., Loureiro E.C.M., Lima V.J.M., Lima F.R.A., Hoff G. (2004) All about FAX: a female adult voxel phantom for Monte Carlo calculation in radiation protection dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 5203-5216. [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R., Khoury H.J., Vieira J.W., Lima V.J.M. (2006) MAX06 and FAX06: update of two adult human phantoms for radiation protection dosimetry, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 3331-3346. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kramer R., Cassola V.F., Khoury H.J., Vieira J.W., de Melo Lima V.J., Brown K.R. (2010) FASH and MASH: female and male adult human phantoms based on polygon mesh surfaces: II. Dosimetric calculations, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 163-189. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee J., Lee C. (2004) Korean adult male voxel model KORMAN segmented from magnetic resonance images, Med. Phys. 31, 1017-1022. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee C., Park S.H., Lee J.K. (2006) Development of the two Korean adult tomographic computational phantoms for organ dosimetry, Med. Phys. 33, 380-390. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li J., Qiu R., Zhang Z., Liu L., Zeng Z., Bi L., Li W. (2009) Organ dose conversion coefficients for external photon irradiation using the Chinese voxel phantom (CVP), Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 135, 33-42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sato K., Noguchi H., Emoto Y., Koga S., Saito K. (2007) Japanese adult male voxel phantom constructed on the basis of CT images, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 123, 337-344. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Saito K., Wittmann A., Koga S., Ida Y., Kamei T., Funabiki J., Zankl M. (2001) Construction of a computed tomographic phantom for a Japanese male adult and dose calculation system, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 40, 69-76. [Google Scholar]
  • Saito K., Sato K., Kinase S., Nagaoka T. (2009) Japanese Computational Phantoms: Otoko, Onago, JM, JM2, JF, TARO, HANAKO, Pregnant Woman, and Deformable Child. Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry (X.G. Xu and K.F. Eckerman, Eds.) pp. 221-253. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Xu X.G., Liu T. (2011). Quantifying uncertainty in radiation protection dosimetry using statistical phantoms. In: The Third International Workshop on Computational Phantoms for Radiation Protection, Imaging and Radiotherapy, August 8−9, 2011, Tsinghua University, Beijing, http://www.virtualphantoms.org/3rdWorkshopInBeijing.html). [Google Scholar]
  • Zankl M., Wittmann, A. (2001) The adult male voxel model “Golem” segmented from whole-body CT patient data, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. 40, 153-162. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang B., Ma J., Liu L., Cheng J. (2007) CNMAN: a Chinese adult male voxel phantom constructed from color photographs of a visible anatomical data set, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 124, 130-136. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang B., Ma J., Zhang G., Liu Q., Qiu R., Li J. (2009a) Chinese Voxel Computational Phantoms: CNMAN, VCH, and CVP. In: Handbook of Anatomical Models for Radiation Dosimetry (X.G. XU and K.F. Eckerman, Eds.) pp. 279-303. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. [Google Scholar]
  • Zhang J., Na Y.H., Caracappa P.F., Xu X.G. (2009b) RPI-AM and RPI-AF, a pair of mesh-based, size-adjustable adult male and female computational phantoms using ICRP-89 parameters and their calculations for organ doses from monoenergetic photon beams, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 5885-5908. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.