Free Access
Volume 50, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2015
Page(s) 43 - 54
Section Articles
Published online 09 January 2015
  • Akhlaghi P., Miri Hakimabad H., Rafat Motavalli L. (2014) An overview of exposure parameters, dose measurements and strategies for dose reduction in pediatric CT examinations, Radioprotection 49, 9-15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Berrington de Gonzàlez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., Mettler F., Land C. (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007, Arch. Intern. Med. 169, 2071-2077. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Bolch W.E., Lee C., Lee C., Hurtado J., Williams J.L. (2010) Applications to computed tomography for pediatric patients. In: Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry (X.G. Xu, K.F. Eckerman Eds) pp. 487-510. Taylor & Francis, New York.
  • Brenner D.J. (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative, Pediatr. Radiol. 32, 228-231. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure, New Engl. J. Med. 357, 2277-2284. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Caon M., Bibbo G., Pattison J. (2000) Monte Carlo calculated effective dose to teenage girls from computed tomography examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 445-448. [CrossRef]
  • Christ A. et al. (2010) The Virtual Family – development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 23-38. [CrossRef]
  • DeMarco J.J., Cagnon C.H., Cody D.D., Stevens D.M., McCollough C.H., O’Daniel J., McNitt-Gray M.F. (2005) A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): Cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3989-4004. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • German Research Center for Environmental Health (2014)
  • Ghita M. (2009) Computer simulations to estimate organ doses from clinically validated cardiac, neuro, and pediatric protocol for multiple detectors computed tomography scanners, PhD. thesis, University of Florida.
  • Goorley T. (2007) MCNP medical physics database, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-07-2777, 1-18.
  • Gu J., Bednarz B., Xu X.G., Jiang S.B. (2008) Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-MAN adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 131, 431-443. [CrossRef]
  • Gu J., Bednarz B., Caracappa P.F., Xu X.G. (2009) The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2699-2717. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • ICRP Publication 89 (2002) Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection reference values, Ann. ICRP 32, 1-277. Pergamon Press.
  • ICRP Publication 102 (2007a) Managing patient dose in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) Ann. ICRP 37 (1), 1-79. Pergamon Press.
  • ICRP Publication 103 (2007b) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4), 1-328. Pergamon Press.
  • ICRP Publication 110 (2009) Adult reference computational phantoms, Ann. ICRP 39 (2), 1-162. Elsevier. [CrossRef]
  • IT’IS Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (2012) Anatomical models.
  • Jarry G., DeMarco J.J., Beifuss U., Cagnon C.H., McNitt-Gray M.F. (2003) A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 2645-2663. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Kalender W.A. (2014) Dose in X-ray computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 129-150, and references therein. [CrossRef]
  • Karimi Shahri K., Rafat-Motavalli L., Miri-Hakimabad H. (2013) Can the same dose data be estimated from phantoms with different anatomies? Radioprotection 48, 527-544. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Lee C., Williams J., Lee C., Bolch W.E. (2005) The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients, Med. Phys. 32, 3537-3548. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Khursheed A., Hillier M.C., Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F. (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations, Brit. J. Radiol. 75, 819-830.
  • Lee C. (2006) Development of the voxel computational phantoms of pediatric patients and their application to organ dose assessment, PhD. thesis, University of Florida.
  • Lee C., Lee C., Williams J.L., Bolch W.E. (2006) Whole-body voxel phantoms of pediatric patients – UF Series B, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 4649-4661. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lee C., Lee C., Staton R.J., Hintenlang D.E., Arreola M.M., Williams J.L., Bolch W.E. (2007) Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination, Med. Phys. 34, 1858-1873. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lee C. et al. (2011) Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations, Med. Phys. 38, 1196-1206. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lee C., Kim K.P., Long D.J., Bolch W.E. (2012) Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation, Med. Phys. 39, 2129-2146. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Staton R.J. et al. (2006) Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 5151-5166. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • USFDA, FDA unveils initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging (2010)
  • Zankl M., Veit R., Williams G., Schneider K., Fendel H., Petoussi N., Drexler G. (1988) The construction of computer tomographic phantoms and their application in radiology and radiation protection, Radiat. Env. Biophys. 27, 153-164. [CrossRef]
  • Zankl M., Panzer W., Petoussi N., Drexler G. (1995) Organ doses for children from computed tomographic examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 57, 393-396.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.