EDP Sciences logo
Authentification abonné
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 50 / Numéro 1 (Janvier-Mars 2015) Radioprotection, 50 1 (2015) 43-54 Références
Accès gratuit
Numéro
Radioprotection
Volume 50, Numéro 1, Janvier-Mars 2015
Page(s) 43 - 54
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2014026
Publié en ligne 9 janvier 2015
  • Akhlaghi P., Miri Hakimabad H., Rafat Motavalli L. (2014) An overview of exposure parameters, dose measurements and strategies for dose reduction in pediatric CT examinations, Radioprotection 49, 9-15. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Berrington de Gonzàlez A., Mahesh M., Kim K.P., Bhargavan M., Lewis R., Mettler F., Land C. (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007, Arch. Intern. Med. 169, 2071-2077. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bolch W.E., Lee C., Lee C., Hurtado J., Williams J.L. (2010) Applications to computed tomography for pediatric patients. In: Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry (X.G. Xu, K.F. Eckerman Eds) pp. 487-510. Taylor & Francis, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D.J. (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative, Pediatr. Radiol. 32, 228-231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D.J., Hall E.J. (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure, New Engl. J. Med. 357, 2277-2284. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caon M., Bibbo G., Pattison J. (2000) Monte Carlo calculated effective dose to teenage girls from computed tomography examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 445-448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Christ A. et al. (2010) The Virtual Family – development of surface-based anatomical models of two adults and two children for dosimetric simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 55, 23-38. [Google Scholar]
  • DeMarco J.J., Cagnon C.H., Cody D.D., Stevens D.M., McCollough C.H., O’Daniel J., McNitt-Gray M.F. (2005) A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): Cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms, Phys. Med. Biol. 50, 3989-4004. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • German Research Center for Environmental Health (2014) http://www.helmholtz-muenchen.de/amsd/service/scientific-services/virtual-human-phantoms-download/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • Ghita M. (2009) Computer simulations to estimate organ doses from clinically validated cardiac, neuro, and pediatric protocol for multiple detectors computed tomography scanners, PhD. thesis, University of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  • Goorley T. (2007) MCNP medical physics database, Los Alamos National Laboratory, LA-UR-07-2777, 1-18. [Google Scholar]
  • Gu J., Bednarz B., Xu X.G., Jiang S.B. (2008) Assessment of patient organ doses and effective doses using the VIP-MAN adult male phantom for selected cone-beam CT imaging procedures during image guided radiation therapy, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 131, 431-443. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gu J., Bednarz B., Caracappa P.F., Xu X.G. (2009) The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2699-2717. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 89 (2002) Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection reference values, Ann. ICRP 32, 1-277. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 102 (2007a) Managing patient dose in multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) Ann. ICRP 37 (1), 1-79. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103 (2007b) The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection, Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4), 1-328. Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 110 (2009) Adult reference computational phantoms, Ann. ICRP 39 (2), 1-162. Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • IT’IS Foundation for Research on Information Technologies in Society (2012) Anatomical models. http://www.itis.ethz.ch/services/anatomical-models/overview/. [Google Scholar]
  • Jarry G., DeMarco J.J., Beifuss U., Cagnon C.H., McNitt-Gray M.F. (2003) A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models, Phys. Med. Biol. 48, 2645-2663. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalender W.A. (2014) Dose in X-ray computed tomography, Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 129-150, and references therein. [Google Scholar]
  • Karimi Shahri K., Rafat-Motavalli L., Miri-Hakimabad H. (2013) Can the same dose data be estimated from phantoms with different anatomies? Radioprotection 48, 527-544. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Williams J., Lee C., Bolch W.E. (2005) The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients, Med. Phys. 32, 3537-3548. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khursheed A., Hillier M.C., Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F. (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations, Brit. J. Radiol. 75, 819-830. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C. (2006) Development of the voxel computational phantoms of pediatric patients and their application to organ dose assessment, PhD. thesis, University of Florida. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee C., Williams J.L., Bolch W.E. (2006) Whole-body voxel phantoms of pediatric patients – UF Series B, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 4649-4661. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Lee C., Staton R.J., Hintenlang D.E., Arreola M.M., Williams J.L., Bolch W.E. (2007) Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination, Med. Phys. 34, 1858-1873. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C. et al. (2011) Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations, Med. Phys. 38, 1196-1206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Kim K.P., Long D.J., Bolch W.E. (2012) Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation, Med. Phys. 39, 2129-2146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Staton R.J. et al. (2006) Organ and effective doses in newborn patients during helical multislice computed tomography examination, Phys. Med. Biol. 51, 5151-5166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • USFDA, FDA unveils initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging (2010) http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/ucm200085.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Zankl M., Veit R., Williams G., Schneider K., Fendel H., Petoussi N., Drexler G. (1988) The construction of computer tomographic phantoms and their application in radiology and radiation protection, Radiat. Env. Biophys. 27, 153-164. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zankl M., Panzer W., Petoussi N., Drexler G. (1995) Organ doses for children from computed tomographic examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 57, 393-396. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.