Impact of the discharge of treated water on residents’ intention to return to areas near the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station a decade after the accident

Open Access

Numéro		Radioprotection Volume 60, Numéro 1, January-March 2025


Page(s)		99 - 108
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024036
Publié en ligne		14 mars 2025

Aldrich D et al. 2015. Social capital and community resilience. Am Behav Sci 59: 254–269. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ando R et al. 2023. Report on the 23rd Fukushima Dialogue “Thinking together about issues of Fukushima Daiichi treated water”. Radioprotection 58 (1): 5–10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Basic Policy on handling of ALPS treated water at the Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings’ Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, 2021. Available online: https://www.meti.go.jp/english/earthquake/nuclear/decommissioning/pdf/bp_alps.pdf [Google Scholar]
Bodas M, et al. 2022. Risk Perception of Natural and Human-Made Disasters—Cross Sectional Study in Eight Countries in Europe and Beyond. Front Public Health 10:825985 [Google Scholar]
Bourguignon M. 2022. The necessary development of post-nuclear accident management preparedness. Radioprotection 57 (1): 7–8. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Clement C, et al. 2022. Maintenir les recommandations de la CIPR adaptées aux besoins. Radioprotection 57: 93–106. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Clement C, et al. 2021. Keeping the ICRP recommendations fit for purpose. J Radiol Prot 41: 1390–1409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Croüail P. et al. 2020. Analysis of the modalities of return of populations to the contaminated territories following the accident at the Fukushima power plant. Radioprotection 55: 79–93. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Do X. 2020. Return Migration after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: the impact of institutional and individual factors. Disasters 44 (3): 569–595. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Facility construction begins for Japan’s Fukushima nuclear wastewater release amid opposition. Available online: https://english.news.cn/20220805/e5c88eb3134f4786b3070af31f364b48/c.html [Google Scholar]
Fukushima Prefectural Government. Result of sea area monitoring associated with the discharge of ALPS treated water into the sea 2023 November 14–16. Available online: https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal-english/en-moni-k.html [Google Scholar]
Gagné I. 2020. Dislocation, social isolation, and the politics of recovery in post-disaster Japan. Transcult Psychiatry 57 (5): 710–723. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Hande V. et al., 2023. Changes in the intention to return and the related risk perception among residents and evacuees of Tomioka town 11 years after the Fukushima nuclear accident. J Disaster Med Public Health 17: e386. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Huaxia (2022). Facility construction begins for Japan's Fukushima nuclear wastewater release amid opposition (Xinhua net) [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2015. The Fukushima Daiichi Accident, Report by the Director General. Available online: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/Pub1710-ReportByTheDG-Web.pdf [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2022. Review of Safety Related Aspects of Handling ALPS Treated Water at TEPCO’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Report 4: Review Mission to TEPCO and METI. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/report-4-review-mission-tepco-and-meti.pdf [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2023. Comprehensive report on the safety review of the ALPS treated water at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/iaea_comprehensive_alps_report.pdf [Google Scholar]
ICRP Publication 146. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident,Ann. [Google Scholar]
Maeda Y. et al., 2002. Determinants of trust in industry, government, and citizen’s groups in Japan. Risk Anal 23 (2): 303–310. [Google Scholar]
Matsumoto M. 2018. Formation of third place by evacuees from nuclear accident: case study of wide area residents’ association of Tomioka town, Futaba County, Fukushima Prefecture. J Disaster Res 13 (6): 1142–1156. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Matsunaga H. et al., 2021. Intention to return in residents of Okuma and its characteristics: the evacuation order was lifted eight years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident. J Radiat Res. 62: 68–70. [Google Scholar]
Murakami M. et al., 2019. Lower psychological distress levels among returnees compared with evacuees after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Tohoku J Exp Med 247: 13–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
NEA. 2020. Making the most of practical experiences gained during past crises or disasters for improving mental health and psychosocial support in radiation emergencies. Available online: https://www.oecd-nea.org/upload/docs/application/pdf/2020-09/egnr_web_events_-_flyer_final.pdf [Google Scholar]
Onyx J, et al. 2000. Measuring social capital in five communities, J Appl Behav Sci 36: 23–42. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Panchenko S. 2001. Chernobyl in three dimensions. Addressing the Rehabilitation and Secondary Medical Consequences of the Chernobyl Disaster European Commission. Available online: http://en.ibrae.ac.ru/russian/chernobyl-3d/society/III_3_6.htm (Translated from Russian by DeepL). [Google Scholar]
Saito M. et al. 2017. Development of an instrument for community-level health related social capital among Japanese older people: the JAGES Project. J Epidemiol 27: 221–227. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Shimizu N. 2022. Nuclear disaster and gender: invisible women’s experiences of the disaster and their support needs. Academic Trends 27 (4): 441–445. (Translated from Japanese by DeepL). [Google Scholar]
Staněk R. et al., 2021. Social capital and mobility: an experimental study. MUNI ECON Working Paper. Available online: https://doi.org/10.5817/WP_MUNI_ECON_2021-12 [Google Scholar]
Sung O et al. 2022. Radiation risk perception and its associated factors among residents living near nuclear power plants: a nationwide survey in Korea, Nucl Eng Technol 54 (4): 1295–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Takamura N et al., 2021. Experiences of crisis communication during radiation emergency and risk communication for recovery of the community in Fukushima. J Radiat Res 62: 95–100. [Google Scholar]
Thu Zar W et al. 2023. An analysis of the desire to make radiation measurements and to dialogue with experts among the residents of Tomioka town, Fukushima Prefecture: about the implementation of the co-expertise process. Radioprotection 58: 79–89 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Tokuda Y et al. 2009. Assessing items on the SF-8 Japanese version for health-related quality of life: a psychometric analysis based on the nominal categories model of item response theory. Value Health 12: 568–573. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tomioka Town. What we do at Tomioka Town Food Inspection Center”. Available online: https://tomioka-radiation.jp/shokuhinkensajo.html [Google Scholar]
Uchida Y et al. 2015. Changes in consumer behavior regarding local food products after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: a case study of Fukushima City. Agric Human Values 32 (3): 495–504. [Google Scholar]
Uekusa S et al., 2022. Conceptualizing disaster social capital: what it is, why it matters, and how it can be enhanced. Disasters 46: 56–79. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
UNSCEAR. 2022. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, Vol I. Available online: https://www.unscear.org/unscear/uploads/documents/unscear-reports/UNSCEAR_2020_21_Report_Vol.I.pdf [Google Scholar]
Villalonga-Olives E et al., 2017. The dark side of social capital: a systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital, Soc Sci Med 194: 105–127. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yamaguchi A et al., 2017. Influences of social capital on natural disaster research in Japan. J Sustain Dev 10: 46–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yamakawa M, et al. 2017. Rebuilding Fukushima, 1st ed. Routledge: Abingdon, New York, pp 43–47. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.