Accès gratuit
Editorial
| Numéro |
Radioprotection
Volume 58, Numéro 1, January - March 2023
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 1 - 3 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2023007 | |
| Publié en ligne | 24 février 2023 | |
- Ammerich M, et al. 2022. La personne compétente en radioprotection / le conseiller en radioprotection : historique, constats et enjeux. Radioprotection 57(4): 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022036. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Andresz S, Zéphir A, Bez J, Karst M, Danieli J. 2022. Artificial intelligence and radiation protection. A game changer or an update? Radioprotection 57(2): 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022004. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Benderitter M, Herrera Reyes E, Benadjaoud MA, Vanhavere F, Impens N, Mayerhofer-Sebera U, Hierath M, Jourdain JR, Frija G, Repussard J. 2021. MEDIRAD formulation of science-based recommendations for medical radiation protection: A stakeholder forum survey. Radioprotection 56(4): 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Berlin Declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. 2003. https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration. [Google Scholar]
- Bertho JM, Gabillaud-Poillion F, Reuter C, Riviere O. 2022. Comparative study of nuclear post-accident management doctrines in Europe and North America. Radioprotection 57(1): 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022002. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bourguignon M. 2021. Radioprotection : les défis de l’open access.Radioprotection 2021: 179–180. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Clement C, et al. 2022. Maintenir les recommandations de la CIPR adaptées aux besoins. Radioprotection 57(2): 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022010. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Cosset JM. 2022. Is the linear no-threshold (LNT) model relevant for radiotherapy? Radioprotection 57(3): 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022023. [Google Scholar]
- Foray N, Averbeck D, Cosset JM, Drouet M, Favaudon V, Masse R. 2021. La radiobiologie française : historique, constats et enjeux. Radioprotection 56(4): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021029. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Lee H, Kim I. 2021. Accumulations of artificial radionuclides 137Cs and 239+240Pu in anchovy from the Korean seas. Radioprotection 56(4): 319–326. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021009. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Métivier H, Lallemand J, Henri A. 2012. Radioprotection et open access. Radioprotection 47(1): 11–12. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2012007. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Nguyen D, Farah J, Josserand-Pietri F, Barbet N, Khodri M. 2022. Benefits and challenges of standard ceiling-mounted surface guided radiotherapy systems for breast treatments on Halcyon™. Radioprotection 56(4): 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021025. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Plan S. 2018. Accelerating the transition to full and immediate open access to scientific publications. Science Europe. Available from https://web.archive.org/web/20180904122211/https://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Plan_S.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- Rump A, Hermann C, Lamkowski A, Abend M, Port M. 2022. The properties and health hazards from early nuclear weapon fallout: The Castle Bravo incident revisited. Radioprotection 57(4): 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022030. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Swartz HM, Swarts SG, Ainsbury E, Wilkins RC, Port M, Trompier F, Flood AB, Roy L. 2022. Complementary lessons learned from the testing strategies used for radiation emergencies and COVID-19: A white paper from The International Association of Biological and Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Radiation Dosimetry (IABERD). Radioprotection 57(3): 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022022. [Google Scholar]
- Thu Zar W, Lochard J, Taira Y, Takamura N, Orita M, Matsunaga H. 2022. Risk communication in the recovery phase after a nuclear accident: The contribution of the “co-expertise process”. Radioprotection 57(4): 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022031. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.
Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.
Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.