Characterization of optically stimulated luminescence for assessment of breast doses in mammography screening

Accès gratuit

Numéro		Radioprotection Volume 51, Numéro 1, January-March 2016


Page(s)		51 - 58
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2015032
Publié en ligne		28 mars 2016

Al-Senan R.M. et al. (2011) Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range, Med. Phys. 38, 4396-4405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Andersen C.E. et al. (2009) Characterization of a fiber-coupled Al₂O₃:C luminescence dosimetry system for online in vivo dose verification during ¹⁹²Ir brachytherapy, Med. Phys. 36, 708-718. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Andersson I. (1986) Mammography in clinical practice. Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester. [Google Scholar]
Aznar M.C. et al. (2005) A Monte Carlo study of the energy dependence of Al₂O₃:C crystals for the real-time in vivo dosimetry in mammography, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 114, 444-449. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Boone J.M. et al. (2001) Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation, Radiology 221, 657-667. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chen B. et al. (2012) Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography, Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 868-872. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dance D.R. (1990) Monte-carlo calculation of conversion factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose, Phys. Med. Biol. 35, 1211-1219. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Dance D.R. et al. (1999) Breast dosimetry, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 50, 185-203. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dance D.R. et al. (2000) Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol, Phys. Med. Biol. 45, 3225-3240. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Edwards C.R. et al. (2005) The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti, Br. J. Radiol. 78, 543-547. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
US Dpt of Health and Human Services, Bassett L.W. (1995) High quality mammography: information for referring providers, Breast J. 1, 331-332. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Huang S. et al. (2008) The effect of skin thickness determined using breast CT on mammographic dosimetry, Med. Phys. 35, 1199-1207. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
IAEA (2007) Dosimetry in diagnostic radiology: an international code practice, Technical reports series no. 457. IAEA, Vienna, pp. 155-187. [Google Scholar]
Jursinic P.A. (2007) Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements, Med. Phys. 34, 4594-4604. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Jursinic P.A. (2010) Changes in optically stimulated luminescent dosimeter (OSLD) dosimetric characteristics with accumulated dose, Med. Phys. 37, 132-140. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Lavoie L. et al. (2011) Characterization of a commercially-available, optically-stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for use in computed tomography, Health Phys. 101, 299-310. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Oliveira B.B. et al. (2014) Mean glandular dose for different angles of the X-ray tube using different glandularity phantoms, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 95, 202-204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Oliveira M. et al. (2007) Average glandular dose and phantom image quality in mammography, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 580, 574-577. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Perks C.A. et al.(2007) Medical dosimetry using Optically Stimulated Luminescence dots and microStar readers. In: Proceedings of the 12th Congress of the International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA12), pp. 1-10. IAEA. [Google Scholar]
Poliei S.R. et al. (1987) Occult breast cancer; prevalence and radiographic detectability, Radiology 163, 459-462. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tsai H.Y. et al. (2010) Evaluation of depth dose and glandular dose for digital mammography, Radiat. Meas. 45, 726-728. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Viamonte L.A.R. et al. (2008) Radiotherapy dosimetry using a commercial OSL system, Med. Phys. 35, 1261-1266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Vinnicombe S. et al. (2009) Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: comparison within the U.K. breast screening program and systematic review of published data, Radiology 251, 347-358. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Young K.C. (2002) Radiation doses in UK trial of breast screening in women aged 40-48 years, Br. J. Radiol. 75, 362-370. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yukihara E.G. et al. (2008) Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry in medicine, Phys. Med. Biol. 53, R351-R379. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yusuf M. et al. (2014) Characterization of the Optically Stimulated Luminescence nanoDot for CT Dosimetry, Life Sci. J. 11, 445-450. [Google Scholar]
Zoetelief J. et al. (1996) European protocol on dosimetry in mammography, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 80, 191-193. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.