Open Access
Editorial
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 1 - 3 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2026001 | |
| Published online | 20 March 2026 | |
- Ando R, Lochard J, Schneider T, Akimoto N, Sasaki D, Iseki K. 2024. Young generations facing post-nuclear accident situations: From Chernobyl to Fukushima. Radioprotection 59(4): 261–269. [Google Scholar]
- CODIRPA. 2022. Comité directeur pour la gestion de la phase post-accidentelle d’un accident nucléaire ou d’une situation d’urgence radiologique. Conséquences sanitaires d’un accident nucléaire. Questions-réponses pour les professionnels de santé. Autorité de sûreté nucléaire (ASN). Disponible sur : https://reglementation-controle.asnr.fr/publications/2022/CODIRPA-Consequences-sanitaires-accident-nucleaire/. [Google Scholar]
- Dubreuil GH, Lochard J, Girard P, Guyonnet JF, Le Cardinal G, Lepicard S, Livolsi P, Monroy M, Ollagnon H, Pena-Vega A, Pupin V, Rigby J, Rolevitch I, Schneider T. 1999. Chernobyl post-accident management: The ETHOS project. Health Phys. 77: 361–372. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident. ICRP Publication 146. Ann. ICRP 49(4). [Google Scholar]
- IRSN. 2012. Accident de Fukushima Daïchi (Japon, 2011). Disponible sur : https://recherche-expertise.asnr.fr/savoir-comprendre/crise/impact-seisme-tsunami-sur-centrale-nucleaire-fukushima-daiichi. [Google Scholar]
- Lochard J, Schneider T, Ando R, Niwa O, Clement C, Lecomte JF, Tada JI. 2019. An overview of the dialogue meetings initiated by ICRP in Japan after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 54(2): 87–101. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Reason J. 1995. A systems approach to organizational error. Ergonomics 38(8): 1708–1721. [Google Scholar]
- Reason J. 2008. The human contribution – Unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries (R.-U. Farnham, Ed.). Ashgate Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Steinhauser G, Brandl A, Johnson TE. 2014. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: A review of the environmental impacts. Sci Total Environ 470-471: 800–817. [Google Scholar]
- Thu Zar W, Lochard J, Taira Y, Takamura N, Orita M, Matsunaga H. 2022. Risk communication in the recovery phase after a nuclear accident: The contribution of the “co-expertise process”. Radioprotection 57(4): 281–288. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Thu Zar W, Hande V, Orita M, Matsunaga H, Lochard J, Schneider T, Takamura N. 2025. Concerns and knowledge-seeking behavior among futaba residents after the Fukushima nuclear disaster: Insights from qualitative and quantitative analyses. Radioprotection 60(4): 344–353. [Google Scholar]
- UNSCEAR. 2008. Report to the General Assembly with scientific annexes. Disponible sur : http://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2008/11-80076_Report_2008_Annex_D.pdf. [Google Scholar]
- UNSCEAR. 2013. United Nation Scientific Committee on the effects on atomic radiation, report to the general assembly, vol. 1, annex A: Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great est-japan earthquake and tsunami, 2013. Disponible sur : https://www.unscear.org/docs/reports/2013/13-85418_Report_2013_Annex_A.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.