Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2025
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 373 - 381 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024060 | |
| Published online | 15 December 2025 | |
- Badger J, Taylor P, Swain I. 2017. The safety of electrical stimulation in patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a systematic review. J Rehabilit Assist Technolog Eng 4: 205566831774549. [Google Scholar]
- Driessen S, Napp A, Schmiedchen K, Kraus T, Stunder D. 2019 Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: a systematic review. EP Europace 21: 219–229. [Google Scholar]
- Egger F, Hofer C, Hammerle FP, Lofler S, Nurnberg M, Fiedler L, Kriz R, Kern H, Huber K. 2019. Influence of electrical stimulation therapy on permanent pacemaker function, Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 131(13–14): 313–320. [Google Scholar]
- Gerçek C, Kourtiche D, Nadi M, Magne I, Schmitt P, Roth P, Souques M. 2020. Phantom model testing of active implantable cardiac devices at 50/60 Hz electric field. Bioelectromagnetics 41: 136–147. [Google Scholar]
- Gustrau F, Bahr A, Goltz S, Eggert S. 2002. Active medical implants and occupational safety - measurement and numerical calculation of interference voltage. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomed Eng 47: 656–659. [Google Scholar]
- Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2019. IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 Hz to 300 GHz, IEEE-C95.1. [Google Scholar]
- International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). 2010. Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric and magnetic fields (1 Hz to 100 kHz). Health Phys 99: 818–836. [Google Scholar]
- Lennerz C, Schaarschmidt C, Blažek P, Knoll K, Kottmaier M, Reents T, Bourier F, Lengauer S, Popa M, Wimbauer K, Bahlke F, Krafft H, Englert F, Friedrich L, Schunkert H, Hessling G, Deisenhofer I, Kolb C, O’Connor M. 2023 High-power chargers for electric vehicles: are they safe for patients with pacemakers and defibrillators? Europace 25: euad042. [Google Scholar]
- Magne I, Souques M. 2012. Risk assessment for implanted cardiac defibrillator workers occupationally exposed to electromagnetic fields, in International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE, 2012, Rome, Italy, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Magne I, Souques M, Courouve L, Duburcq A, Remy E, Cabanes PA, 2020. Exposure of adults to extremely low frequency magnetic field in France: results of the EXPERS study. Radioprotection 55: 39-50. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Mattei E, Lucano E, Censi F, Triventi M, Calcagnini G. 2016. Provocative testing for the assessment of the electromagnetic interference of RFID and NFC readers on implantable pacemaker. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compatib 58: 314–322. [Google Scholar]
- Mattei E, Calcagnini G, Censi F, Pinto I, Bogi A, Falsaperla R. 2019. Workers with active implantable medical devices exposed to EMF: in vitro test for the risk assessment. Environments 6: 119. [Google Scholar]
- Mattei E, Censi F, Calcagnini G, Falsaperla R. 2021. Workers with cardiac AIMD exposed to EMF: methods and case studies for risk analysis in the framework of the European regulations. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18: 9709. [Google Scholar]
- Napp A, Stunder D, Maytin M, Kraus T, Marx N, Driessen S. 2015. Are patients with cardiac implants protected against electromagnetic interference in daily life and occupational environment? Eur Heart J 36: 1798–1804. [Google Scholar]
- Nazarian S, Roguin A, Zviman MM, Lardo AC, Dickfeld TL, Calkins H, Weiss RG, Berger RD, Bluemke DA, Halperin HR, 2006. Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 Tesla. Circulation 114: 1277–1284. [Google Scholar]
- Nordbeck P, Weiss I, Ehses P, Ritter O, Warmuth M, Fidler F, Herold V, Jakob PM, Ladd ME, Quick HH, Bauer WR, 2009. Measuring RF, -induced currents inside implants: Impact of device configuration on MRI safety of cardiac pacemaker leads. Magn Reson Med 61: 570–578. [Google Scholar]
- Seckler T, Jagielski K, Stunder D. 2015. Assessment of electromagnetic interference with active cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) caused by the Qi A13 design wireless charging board. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 5886–5904. [Google Scholar]
- Seidman SJ, Guag J, Beard B, Arp Z. 2021. Static magnetic field measurements of smart phones and watches and applicability to triggering magnet modes in implantable pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Heart Rhythm 18: 1741–1744. [Google Scholar]
- Seidman SJ, Pantchenko O, Tennakoon D. 2014. Design of unique simulators to evaluate medical device susceptibility to radio frequency identification exposure. IEEE Electromagn Compat Mag 3: 70–74. [Google Scholar]
- Strom JB, Whelan JB, Shen C, Zheng SQ, Mortele KJ, Kramer DB, 2017. Safety and utility of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Heart Rhythm 14: 1138–1144. [Google Scholar]
- Stunder D, Seckler T, Joosten S, Zink MD, Driessen S, Kraus T, Marx N, Napp A. 2017. In vivo study of electromagnetic interference with pacemakers caused by everyday electric and magnetic fields. Circulation 135: 907–909. [Google Scholar]
- Suhail Arain S, Cretnik A, Huemer M, Attanasio P, Nagel P, Landmesser U, Hardt J, Sidhu K, Tscholl V, Roser M. 2023. Risk of occurrence of electromagnetic interference from the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the sensing function of implantable defibrillators. Europace 25: euad206. [Google Scholar]
- Tiikkaja M, Aro AL, Alanko T, Lindholm H, Sistonen H, Hartikainen JE, Toivonen L, Juutilainen J, Hietanen M. 2013. Testing of common electromagnetic environments for risk of interference with cardiac pacemaker function. Safety Health Work 4: 156–159. [Google Scholar]
- Tondato F, Bazzell J, Schwartz L, Mc Donald BW, Fisher R, Anderson SS, Galindo A, Dueck AC, Scott LR, 2017. Safety and interaction of patients with implantable cardiac defibrillators driving a hybrid vehicle. Int J Cardiol 227: 318–324. [Google Scholar]
- Wase A, Hussain UA, Ratajczak T, Aung TT, Ali O, Markert RJ, 2023. The impact of electromagnetic interference from charging all-electric vehicles on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator performance. J Innov Cardiac Rhythm Manag 14: 5600–5604. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng Q, Liu J, Angelone LM, Lloyd T, Wedan S, Chen J, Kainz W. 2019. Investigation of RF-induced heating near interventional catheters at 1.5 T MRI: a combined modeling and experimental study. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 61: 1423–1431. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou M, Kourtiche D, Claudel J, Deschamps F, Magne I, Roth P, Schmitt P, Souques M, Nadi M. 2022. Interference thresholds for active implantable cardiovascular devices in occupational low-frequency electric and magnetic fields: a numerical and in vitro study. Med Eng Phys 104: 103799. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou M. 2023. EMF of cardiac implants at low frequencies 50 Hz in a normative context. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Lorrain. Available at: https://shs.hal.science/STAR/tel-04218487v1. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou M, Kourtiche D, Claudel J, Deschamps F, Magne I, Roth P, Schmitt P, Nadi M. 2024. Interference voltage measurement and analysis of cardiac implants exposed to electric fields at extremely low frequency. Biomed Phys Eng Express 10: 045060. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.