Post-accident changes in the interests of residents of a municipality near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station: text analysis of residents’ town meeting minutes

Open Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 60, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2025


Page(s)		186 - 194
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024045
Published online		13 June 2025

Ando R, Koyama Y, Kobayashi T, Sasaki D, Akimoto N, Schneider T, Lochard J, Kanai Y. 2023. Report on the 24th Fukushima Dialogue Creating the future of Fukushima together with the next generation. Radioprotection 58: 161–167. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bardos RP, Thomas HF, Smith JWN, Harries ND, Evans F, Boyle R, Howard T, Lewis R, Thomas AO, Dent VL, Haslam A. 2020. Sustainability assessment framework and indicators developed by SuRF-UK for land remediation option appraisal. Remed J 31: 5–27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Blackman D, Nakanishi H, Benson AM. 2017. Disaster resilience as a complex problem: why linearity is not applicable for long-term recovery. Technol Forecast Soc Change 121: 89–98. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Cernea M. 1997. The risks and reconstruction model for resettling displaced populations. World Dev 25: 1569–1587. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Fukushima Prefecture. 2024. Transition of the evacuation zones −Explanation-. https://www.pref.fukushima.lg.jp/site/portal-english/en-1-3-1.html. [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2013. Revision of the ‘restricted area’ and ‘evacuation order area’ in Futaba town. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/2758.htm (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2021. Futaba Town’ actions from 2011 to 2021. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/9534.htm (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2023a. Evacuation status (as of August 31, 2023). https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/10592.htm (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2023b. Return intention survey to the areas outside the specified reconstruction and revitalisation area. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/10460.htm (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2024a. Population and number of households in Futaba Town (since the Great East Japan Earthquake). https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/5873.htm (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Futaba Town. 2024b. Futaba residents’ meeting. https://www.town.fukushima-futaba.lg.jp/4688.htm (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Hande V, Orita M, Matsunaga H, Kashiwazaki Y, Xiao X, Taira Y, Takamura N. 2023. Importance of improving radiation risk perception during reconstruction of Futaba town at 11 yr after lifting of Fukushima nuclear accident evacuation orders. Radioprotection 58: 261–269. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Higuchi K. 2016. A two-step approach to quantitative content analysis: KH coder tutorial using Anne of Green Gables (part 1). Ritsumeikan Soc Sci Rev 52: 77–91. [Google Scholar]
Higuchi K. 2017. A two-step approach to quantitative content analysis: KH coder tutorial using Anne of Green Gables (part 2). Ritsumeikan Soc Sci Rev 53: 137–147. [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2002. Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
IAEA>. 2018. Arrangements for the Termination of a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
ICRP. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Ann ICRP 49: 11–135. [Google Scholar]
Kachi N, Kato H, Hayashi Y, Morisugi M. 2006. A quality of life index measured by life year for evaluating residential areas and its application to examining policies to control urban sprawl. Jpn J JSCE D 62: 558–573. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Ministry of the Environment. 2024. The interim storage facility environmental safety committee. http://josen.env.go.jp/chukanchozou/action/safety_commission/ (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Murakami M, Takebayashi Y, Ono K, Kubota A, Tsubokura M. 2020. The decision to return home and wellbeing after the Fukushima disaster. Int J Disaster Risk Reducti 47: 101538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Murakami M, Takebayashi Y, Tsubokura M. 2019. Lower psychological distress levels among returnees compared with evacuees after the Fukushima nuclear accident. Tohoku J Exp Med 247: 13–17. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology. 2023. Oazashi Hosoya (History of the Hosoya District). https://unit.aist.go.jp/georesenv/geoevaluation/ja/reports/files/hosoya_05_0711.pdf (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
NEA. 2021. Preparedness for Post-Accident Recovery: Lessons from Experience. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
NEA. 2022. Building a Framework for Post-Nuclear Accident Recovery Preparedness. Paris: OECD Publishing. [Google Scholar]
Reconstruction Agency. 2017. Approval of the Futaba Town reconstruction and revitalisation plan for the specified reconstruction and revitalisation base area. https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/m17/09/20170913175109.html (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Reconstruction Agency. 2023. Current status of reconstruction and future efforts. https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/english/topics/Progress_to_date/English_October_2023_genjoutorikumi-E.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Reconstruction Agency, Fukushima Prefecture, Futaba Town. 2023. Futaba Town residents’ opinion survey report. https://www.reconstruction.go.jp/topics/main-cat1/sub-cat1-4/ikoucyousa/r4_houkokusyo_hutaba.pdf (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Takano T, Morita H, Togawa T, Fukumoto M, Mimuro A, Kato H, Hayashi Y. 2013a. Evaluation of living environment for refugees after the Great East Japan Earthquake in each detailed district. J Jpn Soc Civ Eng, Ser. D3 69: I_125–I_135. (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
Takano T, Morita H, Togawa T, Fukumoto M, Mimuro A, Shibahara N, Kato H, Hayashi Y. 2013b. Evaluation of living environment for refugees after the Great East Japan Earthquake in each detailed district. In: The 13th International Conference on Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management, Session 5, 3, Jul. 2013, Utrecht. https://cupum2013.geo.uu.nl/download/usb/contents/windows/pages/papersessions.html. [Google Scholar]
Tatsuki S. 2007. Long-term life recovery processes among survivors of the 1995 Kobe earthquake: 1999, 2001, 2003, and 2005 life recovery social survey results. J Disaster Res 2: 484–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ülengin B, Ülengin F, Güvenç Ü. 2001. A multidimensional approach to urban quality of life: the case of Istanbul. Eur J Oper Res 130: 361–374. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yonetani M. 2017. Recovery Postponed: the Long-Term Plight of People Displaced by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake, Tsunami and Nuclear Radiation Disaster. Geneva: Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, Norwegian Refugee Council. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.