EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 59 / No 2 (April - June) Radioprotection, 59 2 (2024) 111-116 References
Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 59, Number 2, April - June
Page(s) 111 - 116
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024011
Published online 03 June 2024
  • Aberle C, Ryckx N, Treier R, Schindera S. 2020. Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010. Eur Radiol 30: 1690–1700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, El Serafi A, Hussien T, McConnell JR, Tekin HO. 2020a. Toward national Ct diagnostic reference levels in the United Arab Emirates: a multicenter review of Ct dose index and dose length product. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 190: 243–249. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Tekin HO, Ghonim H, Shawki M, Salama DH. 2020b. Computed tomography radiation doses for common computed tomography examinations: a nationwide dose survey in United Arab Emirates. Insights Imaging 11: 88. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Alashban Y, Shubayr N. 2022. Establishing diagnostic reference levels for CT examinations in the south region of Saudi Arabia. Radiat Phys Chem 201: 110407. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Alashban Y, Shubayr N. 2023. Probability of induced cancers related to computed tomography examinations. Radiat Phys Chem 210: 111020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bertho J-M., Habib Geryes B. 2023. La radioprotection est une attitude. Radioprotection 58: 77–78. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Bijwaard H, de Vries G, Scheurleer J, Roding T, Erenstein H, Ravensbergen W, Haarmans-Jonkman S, van Welie F. 2017. Compliance to diagnostic reference levels for radiation exposure in common radiological procedures in Dutch hospitals: a nation-wide survey carried out by medical imaging students. Radiography (Lond) 23: 197–201. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chu PW, Kofler C, Haas B, Lee C, Wang Y, Chu CA,Stewart C, Mahendra M, Delman BN, Bolch WE, Smith-Bindman R. 2023. Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in adults. Eur Radiol [Google Scholar]
  • Damilakis J, Frija G, Brkljacic B, Vano E, Loose R, Paulo G, Brat H, Tsapaki V, European Society of R. 2023. How to establish and use local diagnostic reference levels: an ESR EuroSafe Imaging expert statement. Insights Imag 14: 27. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. 2010. Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology 257: 158–166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Demb J, Chu P, Nelson T, Hall D, Seibert A, Lamba R, Boone J, Krishnam M, Cagnon C, Bostani M, Gould R, Miglioretti D, Smith-Bindman R. 2017. Optimizing radiation doses for computed tomography across institutions: dose auditing and best practices. JAMA Intern Med 177: 810–817. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Greenwood TJ, Lopez-Costa RI, Rhoades PD, Ramirez-Giraldo JC, Starr M, Street M, Duncan J, McKinstry RC. 2015. CT dose optimization in pediatric radiology: a multiyear effort to preserve the benefits of imaging while reducing the risks. Radiographics 35: 1539–1554. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Guerra VH, Nersissian DY, Melo CS, Vasconcellos C,Freitas RG, Sawamura M, Gebrim E, Costa PR. 2019. Paediatric CT dose optimization in a general hospital. Rev Bras Física Méd 13: 138–144. [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. 2008. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 248:995–1003. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jasieniak J, Kuchcinska A, Podgorska J, Cieszanowski A. 2023. Summary of radiation dose management and optimization: comparison of radiation protection measures between Poland and other countries. Pol J Radiol 88: e12–e21. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kanal KM, Butler PF, Sengupta D, Bhargavan-Chatfield M, Coombs LP, Morin RL. 2017. U.S. diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for 10 adult CT examinations. Radiology 284: 120–133. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Korir GK, Wambani JS, Korir IK, Tries MA, Boen PK. 2016. National diagnostic reference level initiative for computed tomography examinations in Kenya. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 168: 242–252. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumamaru KK, Kogure Y, Suzuki M, Hori M, Nakanishi A, Kamagata K, Hagiwara A, Andica C, Ri K, Houshido N, Aoki S. 2016. A strategy to optimize radiation exposure for non-contrast head CT: comparison with the Japanese diagnostic reference levels. Jpn J Radiol 34: 451–457. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kumsa MJ, Nguse TM, Ambessa HB, Gele TT, Fantaye WG, Dellie ST. 2023. Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for common adult CT examinations: a multicenter survey in Addis Ababa. BMC Med Imag 23: 6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nam S, Park H, Kwon S, Cho PK, Yoon Y, Yoon SW, Kim J. 2022. Updated national diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for CT protocols: A national survey of korean hospitals. Tomography 8: 2450–2459. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rao S, Sharan K, Sukumar S, Chandraguthi SG, Nisha Dsouza R, David LR, Ravichandran S, Uzun B, Kadavigere R, Uzun Ozsahin D. 2023. Systematic review on diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography examinations in radiation therapy planning. Diagnostics (Basel) 13. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rawat U, Cohen S, Levsky JM, Haramati LB. 2015. ACR white paper-based comprehensive dose reduction initiative is associated with a reversal of the upward trend in radiation dose for chest CT. J Am Coll Radiol 12: 1251–1256. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sarma AD, Sharma J, Singha M. 2022. A review on diagnostic reference levels for adult patients undergoing chest (coronary angiography) computed tomography scan in North-East India. Asian Pacific J Health Sci 9: 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, Dunn M. 2006. National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003. Br J Radiol 79: 968–980. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shubayr N, Alashban Y. 2023. Estimation of radiation doses and lifetime attributable risk of radiation-induced cancer in the uterus and prostate from abdomen pelvis CT examinations. Front Public Health 10. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Skovorodko K, Komiagiene R, Maciusovic M, Gilys L, Vajauskas D, Grigoniene V, Ziliukas J, Raudoniene J, Griciene B. 2022. Nationwide survey on radiation doses received by patients in nuclear medicine imaging procedures. J Radiol Prot 42. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsapaki V. 2020 Radiation dose optimization in diagnostic and interventional radiology: current issues and future perspectives. Phys Med 79: 16–21. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wachabauer D, Rothlin F, Moshammer HM, Homolka P. 2020. Diagnostic reference levels for computed tomography in Austria: a 2018 nationwide survey on adult patients. Eur J Radiol 125: 108863. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yang CC. 2020. Evaluation of impact of factors affecting CT radiation dose for optimizing patient dose levels. Diagnostics (Basel) 10: 787. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.