EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 55 / No 3 (July-September 2020) Radioprotection, 55 3 (2020) 237-246 References
Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 55, Number 3, July-September 2020
Page(s) 237 - 246
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020059
Published online 24 August 2020
  • Hasegawa A, Tanigawa K, Ohtsuru A, Yabe H, Maeda M, Shigemura J, Ohira T, Tominaga T, Akashi M, Hirohashi N, Ishikawa T, Kamiya K, Shibuya K, Yamashita S, Chhem RK. 2015. Health effects of radiation and other health problems in the aftermath of nuclear accidents, with an emphasis on Fukushima. Lancet 386(9992): 479–488. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasegawa A, Ohira T, Maeda M, Yasumura S, Tanigawa K. 2016. Emergency responses and health consequences after the Fukushima accident; evacuation and relocation. Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.) 28(4): 237–44. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hasegawa A, Takahashi M, Nemoto M, Ohda T, Yamada C, Matsui S, Fujino M, Satoh K. 2018. Lexical analysis suggests differences between subgroups in anxieties over radiation exposure in Fukushima. J. Radiat. Res. 59(Suppl. 2): 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2015a. The Fukushima Daiichi accident. Technical Volume 1, Description and context of the accident. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2015b. The Fukushima Daiichi accident. Technical Volume 3, Emergency preparedness and response. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2017. Operational intervention levels for reactor emergencies and methodology for their derivation. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2018. Arrangements for the termination of a nuclear or radiological emergency: International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA safety standards series No. GSG-11. [Google Scholar]
  • IRSN. 2019. Shinrai research Project: The 3/11 accident and its social consequences. Rapport IRSN/2019/00178. [Google Scholar]
  • Jacob P, Bogdanova TI, Buglova E, Chepurniy M, Demidchik Y, Gavrilin Y, Kenigsberg J, Meckbach R, Schotola C, Shinkarev S, Tronko MD, Ulanovsky A, Vavilov S, Walsh L. 2006. Thyroid cancer risk in areas of Ukraine and Belarus affected by the Chernobyl accident. Radiat. Res. 165(1): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • Kazakov V, Demidchik E, Astakhova L. 1992. Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl. Nature 359: 21. [Google Scholar]
  • Kudo D, Nakayachi K. 2014. Reputational risk caused by The Great East Japan Earthquake: a study on consumer factors leading to restrained buying. Jpn. J. Soc. Psychol. 30(1): 35–44. [Google Scholar]
  • Li C, Tremblay M, Capello K, Kurihara O, Youngman M, Etherington G, Ansari A, López MA, Franck D, Dewji S. 2019. Monitoring and dose assessment for children following a radiation emergency-part II: calibration factors for thyroid monitoring. Health Phys. 117(3): 283–290. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nuclear Regulation Authority Japan. 2012. The nuclear emergency response guideline. https://www.nsr.go.jp/data/000024441.pdf. Access at 29 June, 2020 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • Nuclear Regulation Authority Japan. 2015. The manual of evacuation exit inspections and simplified decontamination at nuclear disaster. https://www.nsr.go.jp/data/000119567.pdf. Access at 29 June, 2020 (in Japanese). [Google Scholar]
  • Ohtsuru A, Tanigawa K, Kumagai A, Niwa O, Takamura N, Midorikawa S, Nollet K, Yamashita S, Ohto H, Chhem RK, Clarke M. 2015. Nuclear disasters and health: lessons learned, challenges, and proposals. Lancet 386 (9992): 489–497. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsujiguchi T, Itaki C, Kitaya T, Shiroma Y, Kashiwakura I. 2018. Nuclear emergency protection measures and standards: outline of evacuation exit inspections in Japan. Jpn. J. Health Phys. 53(3): 169–175. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsujiguchi T, Yamanouchi K, Kashiwakura I. 2019a. Developing an educational program to help students learn about the resident evacuation protocols and contamination inspection undertaken during nuclear disasters. Jpn. J. Health Phys. 54(2): 129–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsujiguchi T, Ito K, Sato D, Mikami J, Shiroma Y, Hasegawa A, Yamamura H, Kashiwakura I. 2019b. The development of an active learning program for the medical responders in a nuclear disaster. Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 13(5–6): 853–858. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yabe H, Suzuki Y, Mashiko H, Nakayama Y, Hisata M, Niwa S, Yasumura S, Yamashita S, Kamiya K, Abe M. 2014. Psychological distress after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident: results of a mental health and lifestyle survey through the Fukushima Health Management Survey in FY2011 and FY2012. Fukushima J. Med. Sci. 60(1): 57–67. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yajima K, Kim E, Tani K, Tatsuzaki H, Li C, Kurihara O. 2019. A screening survey exercise for thyroid internal exposure from radioiodine after a nuclear accident. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 183(4): 482–487. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yamada A, Watanabe K, Numayama A, Tsujiguchi T, Itaki C, Miura T, Nakamura T. 2018. Report on the training course for fostering the leaders in radiation emergency medicine in Aomori Prefecture 2016. Radiat. Environ. Med. 7(1): 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  • Yamada Y, Orita M, Shinkawa T, Urata H, Kondo H, Takamura N. 2019. Nurses’ interest in nuclear disaster medicine: future capacity building. J. Radiat. Res. 60(3): 333–334. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yasumura S, Goto A, Yamazaki S, Reich MR. 2013. Excess mortality among relocated institutionalized elderly after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Public Health 127(2): 186–188. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.