Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 55, Number 3, Juillet - Septembre 2020
Page(s) 199 - 206
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020060
Published online 05 August 2020
  • Bromet EJ. 2014. Emotional consequences of nuclear power plant disasters. Health Phys 106: 206–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coates R, Czarwinski R. 2018. IRPA Consultation: is the system of protection “fit for purpose” and can it be readily communicated? Views of the radiation protection professionals. J Radiol Prot 38: 440–455. [Google Scholar]
  • Goto A, Bromet EJ, Fujimori K. 2015. Immediate effects of the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster on depressive symptoms among mothers with infants: A prefectural-wide cross-sectional study from the Fukushima Health Management Survey. BMC Psychiatry 15: 59. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hayashi Y. 2009. Scientific basis for risk analysis of food-related substances with particular reference to health effects on children. J Toxicol Sci 34 (Suppl 2): SP201–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Publication 103 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  • Jensen KK. 2004. BSE in the UK: Why the risk communication strategy failed. J Agric Environ Ethics 17: 405–423. [Google Scholar]
  • Kuroda Y, Iwasa H, Orui M, Moriyama N, Nakayama C, Yasumura S. 2018. Association between health literacy and radiation anxiety among residents after a nuclear accident: Comparison between evacuated and non-evacuated areas. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(7). [Google Scholar]
  • Lochard J, Schneider T, Ando R, Niwa O, Clement C, Lecomte JF, Tada JI. 2019. An overview of the dialogue meetings initiated by ICRP in Japan after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 54(2): 87–101. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakashima K, et al. 2015. Radiocesium concentrations in wild mushrooms collected in Kawauchi Village after the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. PEERJ 3: e1427. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1427. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ohtsuru A, et al. 2015. Nuclear disasters and health: lessons learned, challenges, and proposals. Lancet 386: 489–497. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Poston JW Sr., Fortieth Lauriston S. 2017. Taylor Lecture: Radiation Protection and Regulatory Science. Health Phys 112(2): 193–198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sekizawa J. 2013. Other aspects of BSE issues in East Asian countries. Risk Anal 33: 1952–1957. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Staudenherz A, Leitha T. 2011. Medical preparedness in radiation accidents: a matter of logistics and communication not treatment! Int J Occup Environ Med 2: 133–142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsuchida S. 2018. Psychology of safety and risk: the form of safety created by the mind (in Japanese). Baifukan 89–119. [Google Scholar]
  • Yamaguchi T. 2013. Social imaginary and dilemmas of policy practice: The food safety arena in Japan. Food Policy 45: 167–173. [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshida Y, Yoshida Y. 2014. Patient’s recognition level of medical terms as estimated by pharmacists. Environ Health Prev Med 19: 414–421. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshida Y, Yoshida Y. 2015. Patients’ level of medical term recognition as estimated by healthcare workers. Nagoya J Med Sci 77: 123–132. [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshida Y, Yoshida Y, Motoyoshi T, Saito M, Saito MA, Hayase T. 2013. Study of perception gaps in pharmaceutical terms and related issues between laypeople and medical practitioners (in Japanese). Nihon Eiseigaku Zasshi Japanese Journal of Hygiene 68: 126–137. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yoshida Y, et al. 2017. Level of perception of technical terms regarding the effect of radiation on the human body by residents of Japan. Environ Health Prev Med 22: 73. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yumiya Y, Goto A, Murakami M, Ohira T, Rudd RE. 2019. Communication between health professionals and community residents in Fukushima: A focus on the feedback loop. Health Commun 1–9. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.