EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 55 (May 2020) HS1 Radioprotection, 55 (2020) S57-S68 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 55, May 2020
Coping with uncertainties for improved modelling and decision making in nuclear emergencies. Key results of the CONFIDENCE European research project
Page(s) S57 - S68
Section EARLY PHASE MODELLING
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020013
Published online 26 June 2020
  • Andronopoulos S, Davakis E, Bartzis JG. 2009. RODOS-DIPCOT model description and evaluation. Athens (Greece). No. RODOS(RA2)-TN(09)-01. [Google Scholar]
  • Bartnicki J, Haakenstad H, Hov Ø. 2011. Operational SNAP model for remote applications from NRPA. Oslo (Norway): Norwegian Meteorological Institute. No. 12-2011. [Google Scholar]
  • Bedwell P, Korsakissok I, Leadbetter S, Périllat R, Rudas C, Tomas J, Wellings J, Geertsema G, de Vries H. 2020. Operationalising an ensemble approach in the description of uncertainty in atmospheric dispersion modelling and an emergency response. Radioprotection 55(HS1). https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020015. [Google Scholar]
  • Berge E, Klein H, Ulimoen M, Andronopoulos S, Lind O-C, Salbu B, Syed N. 2019. Guidelines for the use of ensemble calculations in an operational context, indicators to assess the quality of uncertainty modeling and ensemble calculations, and tools for ensemble calculation for use in emergency response, D9.5.2 Ensemble calculations for the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides. Hypothetical accident scenarios in Europe: the Western Norway case study. CONCERT Deliverable D9.5. Available from: https://concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Chevalier-Jabet K. 2019a. Design and use of Bayesian networks for the diagnosis/prognosis of severe nuclear accidents. EU program for research and innovation H2020– FAST Nuclear Emergency Tools (FASTNET) project. No. FASTNET-DATA-D2.3. [Google Scholar]
  • Chevalier-Jabet K. 2019b. Source term prediction in case of a severe nuclear accident. In: 5th NERIS workshop, 3–5 April, 2019, Roskilde, Denmark. [Google Scholar]
  • Geertsema G, de Vries H, Sheele R. 2019. High resolution meteorological ensemble data for CONFIDENCE research on uncertainties in atmospheric dispersion in the (pre-)release phase of a nuclear accident. In: 19th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, 3–6 June, Bruges, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • Gering F, Gerich B, Arnold K, Peltonen T, Duranova T, Bujan A, Duran J, Bohun L, Montero M, Trueba C, Puijker L, Twenhöfel C, de Vries H. 2016. Emergency preparedness for long lasting releases – overview and conclusions, Radioprotection 51: S63–S65. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2016034. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Ievdin I, Trybushnyi D, Zheleznyak M, Raskob W. 2010. RODOS re-engineering: aims and implementation details, Radioprotection 45(5 Suppl.): S181–S189. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Korsakissok I, Andronopoulos S, Astrup P, Bedwell P, Chevalier-Jabet K, De Vries H, Geertsema G, Gering F, Hamburger T, Klein H, Leadbetter S, Mathieu A, Pazmandi T, Périllat R, Rudas C, Sogachev A, Szanto P, Tomas J, Twenhöfel C, Wellings J. 2019a. Comparison of ensembles of atmospheric dispersion simulations: lessons learnt from the confidence project about uncertainty quantification. In: 19th International Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes, 3–6 June, Bruges, Belgium. [Google Scholar]
  • Korsakissok I, Périllat R, Andronopoulos S, Astrup P, Bedwell P, Berge E, Quérel A, Klein H, Leadbetter S, Saunier O, Sogachev A, Tomas J, Ulimoen M. 2019b. Guidelines for the use of ensemble calculations in an operational context, indicators to assess the quality of uncertainty modeling and ensemble calculations, and tools for ensemble calculation for use in emergency response, D9.5.3 Ensemble calculation for a past accident scenario: the Fukushima case study. CONCERT Deliverable D9.5. Available from: https://concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Korsakissok I, Geertsema G, Leadbetter SJ, Périllat R, Scheele R, Tomas JM, Andronopoulos S, Astrup P, Bedwell P, Charnock T, Hamburger T, Ievdin I, Pazmandi T, Rudas C, Sogachev A, Szanto P, de Vries H, Wellings J. 2019c. Guidelines for the use of ensemble calculations in an operational context, indicators to assess the quality of uncertainty modeling and ensemble calculations, and tools forensemble calculation for use in emergency response,D9.5.1 Ensemble calculations for the atmospheric dispersion of radionuclides. Hypothetical accident scenarios in Europe: the REM case studies. CONCERT Deliverable D9.5. Available from: https://concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Landman C, Raskob W, Trybushnyi D, Ievdin I. 2016. Creating and running worldwide accident scenarios with JRodos. Radioprotection 51(HS1): S27–S30. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Leadbetter SJ, Andronopoulos S, Bedwell P, Chevalier-Jabet K, Geertsema G, Gering F, Hamburger T, Jones AR, Klein H, Korsakissok I, Mathieu A, Pazmandi T, Périllat R, Rudas C, Sogachev A, Szanto P, Tomas J, Twenhöfel C, De Vries H, Wellings J. 2020. Ranking uncertainties in atmospheric dispersion modelling following the accidental release of radioactive material. Radioprotection 55(HS1). https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020012. [Google Scholar]
  • Mathieu A, Kajino M, Korsakissok I, Périllat R, Quélo D, Quérel A, Saunier O, Sekiyama TT, Igarashi Y, Didier D. 2018a. Fukushima Daiichi-derived radionuclides in the atmosphere, transport and deposition in Japan: a review. Appl. Geochem. 91: 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2018.01.002. [Google Scholar]
  • Müller M, Homleid M, Ivarsson K-I., Køltzow MAØ, Lindskog M, Midtbø KH, Andrae U, Aspelien T, Berggren L, Bjørge D, Dahlgren P, Kristiansen J, Randriamampianina R, Ridal M, Vignes O. 2017. AROME-MetCoOp: a Nordic Convective-Scale Operational Weather Prediction Model. Weather Forecast 32: 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0099.1. [Google Scholar]
  • Sørensen JH, Schönfeldt F, Sigg R, Pehrsson J, Lauritzen B, Bartnicki J, Klein H, Hoe SC, Lindgren J. 2019. Added Value of uncertainty Estimates of SOurce term and Meteorology (AVESOME). NKS-420. [Google Scholar]
  • Sørensen JH, Amstrup B, Feddersen H, Bartnicki J, Klein H, Simonsen M, Lauritzen B, Hoe SC, Israelson C, Lindgren J. 2016. Fukushima Accident: UNcertainty of Atmospheric dispersion modelling (FAUNA). NKS-360. [Google Scholar]
  • Tsuruta H, Oura Y, Ebihara M, Ohara T, Nakajima T. 2014. First retrieval of hourly atmospheric radionuclides just after the Fukushima accident by analyzing filter-tapes of operational air pollution monitoring stations. Sci. Rep. 4: 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06717. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.