Open Access
Volume 55, Number 1, January-March 2020
Page(s) 11 - 16
Published online 09 January 2020
  • Barzilay Y, Schroeder JE, Hiller N, Singer G, Hasharoni A, Safran O, Liebergall M, Itshayek E, Kaplan L. 2014. Robot-assisted vertebral body augmentation: A radiation reduction tool. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39: 153–157. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bernier M-O, Jacob S, Maccia C, Bar O, Catelinois O, Blanchard D, Laurier D. 2012. Patient cumulative radiation exposure in interventional cardiology. Radioprotection 47: 93–103. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Boszczyk BM, Bierschneider M, Panzer S, Panzer W, Harstall R, Schmid K, Jaksche H. 2006. Fluoroscopic radiation exposure of the kyphoplasty patient. Eur. Spine J. 15: 347–355. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bourguignon M, Bérard P, Bertho J, Farah J, Mercat C. 2017. What’s next in Radioprotection? Radioprotection 52: 21–28. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Chou LB, Cox CA, Tung JJ, Harris AH, Brooks-Terrell D, Sieh W. 2010. Prevalence of cancer in female orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. Vol. 92: 240–244. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani MM, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E, Kleiman NJ. 2010. Risk for radiation-induced cataract for staff in interventional cardiology: Is there reason for concern? Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. (official journal of the Soc. Card. Angiogr. Interv.) 76: 826–834. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Durand P, Moreau-Gaudry A, Silvent AS, Frandon J, Chipon E, Medici M, Bricault I. 2017. Computer assisted electromagnetic navigation improves accuracy in computed tomography guided interventions: A prospective randomized clinical trial. PloS one 12: e0173751. [Google Scholar]
  • Feghali J, Tagnard-Mérat F, Donadille L, Rehel J, Aubert B, Allodji R, Gauron C, Farah J, Clairand I. 2014. Statistical analysis of measured operators’ finger doses in interventional radiology. Radioprotection 49: 91–99. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Friedly J, Standaert C, Chan L. 2010. Epidemiology of spine care: The back pain dilemma. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. 21: 659–677. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Griffith JF, Guglielmi G. 2010. Vertebral fracture. Radiol. Clin. 48: 519–529. [Google Scholar]
  • Harstall R, Heini PF, Mini RL, Orler R. 2005. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty: A prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30: 1893–1898. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W, Ogden KM, Khorasani MR. 2008. Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT. Radiology 248: 995–1003. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Izadpanah K, Konrad G, Südkamp NP, Oberst M. 2009. Computer navigation in balloon kyphoplasty reduces the intraoperative radiation exposure. Spine 34: 1325–1329. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jacob S, Bar O, Catelinois O, Maccia C, Laurier D, Bernier M-O. 2013. Risk assessment for potential radiation-induced cancer after lung and bone marrow exposure during interventional cardiology procedures. Radioprotection 48: 203–213. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Klimo P, Schmidt MH. 2004. Surgical management of spinal metastases. Oncol. 9: 188–196. [Google Scholar]
  • Komemushi A, Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Kojima H, Shomura Y, Sawada S. 2005. Radiation exposure to operators during vertebroplasty. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 16: 1327–1332. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li Y-Y, Huang T-J, Cheng C-C, Wu M-H, Lee C-Y. 2013. Comparing radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty using one- vs. two-fluoroscopic technique. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 14: 38. [Google Scholar]
  • Lonjon N, Le Corre M, Le Roy J, Greffier J, Fuentes S, Tonetti J, Charles YP, Blondel B, Kouyoumdjian P. 2016. Surgeon’s and patient’s radiation exposure through vertebral body cement augmentation procedures: A prospective multicentric study of 49 cases. World Neurosurg. 93: 371–376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mastrangelo G, Fedeli U, Fadda E, Giovanazzi A, Scoizzato L, Saia B. 2005. Increased cancer risk among surgeons in an orthopaedic hospital. Occup. Med. (Oxford, England) 55: 498–500. [Google Scholar]
  • Narain AS, Hijji FY, Yom KH, Kudaravalli KT, Haws BE, Singh K. 2017. Radiation exposure and reduction in the operating room: Perspectives and future directions in spine surgery. World J. Orthop. 8: 524. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Panizza D, Barbieri M, Parisoli F, Moro L. 2013. Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 158: 230–234. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Panizza D, Barbieri M, Parisoli F, Moro L. 2014. Patient radiation exposure during different kyphoplasty techniques. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 158: 230–234. [Google Scholar]
  • Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Papadokostakis G, Hadjipavlou A, Gourtsoyiannis N. 2004. Patient exposure and associated radiation risks from fluoroscopically guided vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Radiology 232: 701–707. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Synowitz M, Kiwit J. 2006. Surgeon’s radiation exposure during percutaneous vertebroplasty. J. Neurosurg.: Spine 4: 106–109. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tarantino U, Cannata G, Lecce D, Celi M, Cerocchi I, Iundusi R. 2007. Incidence of fragility fractures. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 19: 7–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Toma CD, Dominkus M, Nedelcu T, Abdolvahab F, Assadian O, Krepler P, Kotz R. 2007. Metastatic bone disease: A 36-year single centre trend-analysis of patients admitted to a tertiary orthopaedic surgical department. J. Surg. Oncol. 96: 404–410. [Google Scholar]
  • Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Rehani MM, Echeverri D, Cabrera M. 2010. Radiation cataract risk in interventional cardiology personnel. Radiat. Res. 174: 490–495 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.