Free Access
Volume 54, Number 4, October-December 2019
Page(s) 289 - 293
Published online 08 October 2019
  • Alaamer A. 2012. Radon awareness among Saudi People in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. World J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 2: 165–168. DOI: 10.4236/wjnst.2012.24025. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Barnawi R, Alrefai W, Qari F, Aljefri A, Hagi S, Khafaji M. 2018. Doctors’ knowledge of the doses and risks of radiological investigations performed in the emergency department. Saudi Med. J. 39(11): 1130–1138. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bastos B, Ferrari D. 2011. Internet and education for the patient. Int. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 15(4): 515–522. [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D, Doll R, Goodhead D, Hall E, Land C, Little J, Lubin J, Preston D, Preston R, Puskin J, Ron E. 2003. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100(24): 13761–13766. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Briggs-Kamara M, Okoye P, Omubo-Pepple V. 2013. Radiation safety awareness among patients and radiographers in three hospitals in Port Harcourt. Am. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 4(1): 83–88. [Google Scholar]
  • CDC. 2018. Available from Accessed on 14/11/2018. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans K, Bodmer J, Edwards B, Levins J, O’Meara A, Ruhotina M, Smith R, Delaney T, Hoffman-Contois R, Boccuzzo L, Hales H. 2015. An exploratory analysis of public awareness and perception of ionizing radiation and guide to public health practice in Vermont. J. Environ. Public Health 2015: 476495. [Google Scholar]
  • Friedman SM. 2011. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation. Bull. At. Sci. 67(5): 55–65. [Google Scholar]
  • Laurier D, Valenty M, Tirmarche M. 2001. Radon exposure and the risk of leukemia: A review of epidemiological studies. Health Phys. 81(3): 272–288. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Markowsky L, Peduto A. 2012. A survey of public perception, concerns and awareness of medical radiation. J. Med. Imaging Radiol. Oncol. 56: 68. [Google Scholar]
  • Mewaldt R. 1996. Cosmic rays. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Physics. [Google Scholar]
  • National Radiological Protection Board. 1991. Survey of CT practice in the UK. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board. [Google Scholar]
  • National Research Council (US) Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR). 1990. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR V (executive summary). Washington DC (US): National Academies Press. Available from [Google Scholar]
  • Perko T. 2014 Radiation risk perception: A discrepancy between the experts and the general population. J. Environ. Radioact. 133: 86–91. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ranjbar M, Aslanpour Z, Kostrzewski A, Cooke A. 2017. Public health campaigns and medicine use awareness: A systematic literature review. Health 9(12): 1689–1710. [Google Scholar]
  • Sharma S, Gupta Y. 2017. Mass media for health education (a study in the state of Rajasthan). Global Res. Acad. 1(1): 26–39. [Google Scholar]
  • Sohail MS. 2015. Gender differences in mall shopping: A study of shopping behaviour of an emerging nation. JMCBEM 1(1): 36–46. [Google Scholar]
  • UN. 1993. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR. 1993: United Nations Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. New York: United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • UN. 2000. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: Sources. New York: United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • UN. 2008. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Report of the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation: Fifty-sixth Session (10–18 July 2008). New York: United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • UN. 2010. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. UNSCEAR 2008. Report to the General Assembly. New York: United Nations Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO. 2018. Available from Accessed on 20/10/2018. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.