Free Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 52, Number 4, October-December 2017
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 265 - 271 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2017028 | |
| Published online | 19 September 2017 | |
- Abbas M. 2001a. Analytical formulae for well-type NaI (Tl) and HPGe detectors efficiency computation, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 55: 245–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abbas M. 2001b. A direct mathematical method to calculate the efficiencies of a parallelepiped detector for an arbitrarily positioned point source, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 60: 3–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Abbas M. 2006. Analytical calculations of the solid angles subtended by a well-type detector at point and extended circular sources, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 64: 1048–1056. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Abbas M, Noureddeen S. 2011. Analytical expression to calculate total and full-energy peak efficiencies for cylindrical phoswich and lanthanum bromide scintillation detector, Radiat. Meas. 46: 440–445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Al-Arbawy H. 2014. Study The effect of the shields movement and its thickness in detection efficiency by using scintillation detector NaI(Tl), Adv. Phys. Theor. Appl. 31: 53–57. [Google Scholar]
- Baba H et al. 1991. Systematic treatment of the photopeak efficiency, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 309: 236–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Badawi M, El-Khatib A, Krar M. 2013. New numerical simulation approach to calibrate the NaI(Tl) detectors array using non-axial extended spherical sources, J. Instrum. 8: 11–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Byun SH et al. 2004. Efficiency calibration and coincidence summing correction for a 4π NaI(Tl) detector array, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 535: 674–685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Cejnar F, Kovář I. 1980. Experimental and calculated photopeak efficiency values for well-type NaI(Tl) detector, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 31: 79–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Chatani H. 1999. Systematization of efficiency correction for gamma-ray disk sources with semiconductor detectors, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 425: 291–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gouda M, Badawi M, El-Khatib A, Abbas M. 2015. Calibration of well-type NaI(Tl) detector using a point sources measured out the detector well at different axial distances, J. Instrum. 10: 3–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang SH et al. 1998. A hybrid method for calculating absolute peak efficiency of germanium detectors, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 413: 281–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Kis Z et al. 1998. Comparison of efficiency functions for Ge gamma-ray detectors in a wide energy range, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 418: 374–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Nafee S, Badawi M, Abdel-Moneim A, Abbas M. 2010. Calibration of the 4π γ-ray spectrometer using a new numerical simulation approach, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68: 1746–1753. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- National Institute of Standard and Technology, Physical Measurements Laboratory. 1998. XCOM Photon Cross-Sections Database, http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/html/xcom1.html. [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez-Reyes AF, Febrián MI, Baró J, Tejada J. 1987. Absolute efficiency calibration function for the energy range 63–3054 keV for a coaxial Ge(Li) detector, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 28: 123–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Yücel H, Cetiner MA, Demirel H. 1996. Dependence of photon interaction depth on linear attenuation coefficient in high pure germanium detectors, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 47: 535–541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.