Accès gratuit
Numéro
Radioprotection
Volume 52, Numéro 4, October-December 2017
Page(s) 265 - 271
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2017028
Publié en ligne 19 septembre 2017
  • Abbas M. 2001a. Analytical formulae for well-type NaI (Tl) and HPGe detectors efficiency computation, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 55: 245–252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas M. 2001b. A direct mathematical method to calculate the efficiencies of a parallelepiped detector for an arbitrarily positioned point source, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 60: 3–9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas M. 2006. Analytical calculations of the solid angles subtended by a well-type detector at point and extended circular sources, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 64: 1048–1056. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Abbas M, Noureddeen S. 2011. Analytical expression to calculate total and full-energy peak efficiencies for cylindrical phoswich and lanthanum bromide scintillation detector, Radiat. Meas. 46: 440–445. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Al-Arbawy H. 2014. Study The effect of the shields movement and its thickness in detection efficiency by using scintillation detector NaI(Tl), Adv. Phys. Theor. Appl. 31: 53–57. [Google Scholar]
  • Baba H et al. 1991. Systematic treatment of the photopeak efficiency, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 309: 236–247. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Badawi M, El-Khatib A, Krar M. 2013. New numerical simulation approach to calibrate the NaI(Tl) detectors array using non-axial extended spherical sources, J. Instrum. 8: 11–18. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Byun SH et al. 2004. Efficiency calibration and coincidence summing correction for a 4π NaI(Tl) detector array, ‎Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 535: 674–685. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cejnar F, Kovář I. 1980. Experimental and calculated photopeak efficiency values for well-type NaI(Tl) detector, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 31: 79–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chatani H. 1999. Systematization of efficiency correction for gamma-ray disk sources with semiconductor detectors, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 425: 291–301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gouda M, Badawi M, El-Khatib A, Abbas M. 2015. Calibration of well-type NaI(Tl) detector using a point sources measured out the detector well at different axial distances, J. Instrum. 10: 3–8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang SH et al. 1998. A hybrid method for calculating absolute peak efficiency of germanium detectors, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 413: 281–292. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kis Z et al. 1998. Comparison of efficiency functions for Ge gamma-ray detectors in a wide energy range, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. 418: 374–386. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nafee S, Badawi M, Abdel-Moneim A, Abbas M. 2010. Calibration of the 4π γ-ray spectrometer using a new numerical simulation approach, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 68: 1746–1753. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • National Institute of Standard and Technology, Physical Measurements Laboratory. 1998. XCOM Photon Cross-Sections Database, http://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/Xcom/html/xcom1.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez-Reyes AF, Febrián MI, Baró J, Tejada J. 1987. Absolute efficiency calibration function for the energy range 63–3054 keV for a coaxial Ge(Li) detector, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 28: 123–127. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Yücel H, Cetiner MA, Demirel H. 1996. Dependence of photon interaction depth on linear attenuation coefficient in high pure germanium detectors, Appl. Radiat. Isot. 47: 535–541. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.