Free Access
Volume 50, Number 3, Juillet-Septembre 2015
Page(s) 195 - 201
Section Articles
Published online 26 March 2015
  • Colletti P.M., Micheli O.A., Lee K.H. (2013) To shield or not to shield: application of bismuth breast shields, Am. J. Roentgenol. 200 (3), 503-507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Colombo P., Pedroli G., Nicoloso M., Re S., Valvassori L., Vanzulli A. (2004) Evaluation of the efficacy of a bismuth shield during CT examinations, Radiol. Med. 108 (5-6), 560-568. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira C.C., Ximenes R.E., Garcia C.A.B., Vieira J.W., Maia A.F. (2010) Total mass attenuation coefficient evaluation of ten materials commonly used to simulate human tissue, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 249 (1), 012029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goenka A.H., Herts B.R., Obuchowski N.A., Primak A.N., Dong F., Karim W., Baker M.E. (2014) Effect of reduced radiation exposure and iterative reconstruction on detection of low-contrast low-attenuation lesions in an anthropomorphic liver phantom: an 18-reader study, Radiology 272 (1), 154-163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hara A.K., Paden R.G., Silva A.C., Kujak J.L., Lawder H.J., Pavlicek W. (2009) Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study, Am. J. Roentgenol. 193 (3), 764-771. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Heaney D.E., Norvill C.A. (2006) A comparison of reduction in CT dose through the use of gantry angulations or bismuth shields, Australas Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 29 (2), 172-178. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hohl C., Wildberger J.E., Süß C., Thomas C., Mühlenbruch G., Schmidt T., Mahnken A.H. (2006) Radiation Dose Reduction to Breast and Thyroid During MDCT: Effectiveness of an In-Plane Bismuth Shield, Acta Radiologica 47 (6), 562-567. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103 (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann. ICRP 37 (2-4), 1-332. [Google Scholar]
  • Kalra M.K., Dang P., Singh S., Saini S., Shepard J.A. (2009) In-plane shielding for CT: effect of off-centering, automatic exposure control and shield-to-surface distance, Korean J. Radiol. 10 (2), 156-163. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalra M.K., Maher M.M., Toth T.L., Kamath R.S., Halpern E.F., Saini S. (2004) Comparison of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis, Radiology 232 (2), 347-353. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalra M.K., Rizzo S., Maher M.M., Halpern E.F., Toth T.L., Shepard J.A., Aquino S.L. (2005) Chest CT performed with z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose, Radiology 237 (1), 303-308. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keil B., Wulff J., Schmitt R., Auvanis D., Danova D., Heverhagen J.T., Zink K. (2008) Protection of eye lens in computed tomography – dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations, Rofo 180 (12), 1047-1053. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim Y.K., Sung Y.M., Choi J.H., Kim E.Y., Kim H.S. (2013) Reduced radiation exposure of the female breast during low-dose chest CT using organ-based tube current modulation and a bismuth shield: comparison of image quality and radiation dose, Am. J. Roentgenol. 200 (3), 537-544. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee K., Lee W., Lee J., Lee B., Oh G. (2010) Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using AEC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 141 (2), 162-167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee Y.H., Park E.T., Cho P.K., Seo H.S., Je B.K., Suh S.I., Yang K.S. (2011) Comparative analysis of radiation dose and image quality between thyroid shielding and unshielding during CT examination of the neck, Am. J. Roentgenol. 196 (3), 611-615. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Leswick D.A., Hunt M.M., Webster S.T., Fladeland D.A. (2008) Thyroid shields versus z-axis automatic tube current modulation for dose reduction at neck CT, Radiology 249 (2), 572-580. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Matsubara K., Koshida K., Noto K., Takata T., Suzuki M., Shimono T., Matsui O. (2011) A head phantom study for intraocular dose evaluation of 64-slice multidetector CT examination in patients with suspected cranial trauma, Eur. J. Radiol. 79 (2), 283-287. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mettler F.A., Bhargavan M., Faulkner K., Gilley D.B., Gray J.E., Ibbott G.S., Yoshizumi T.T. (2009) Radiologic and Nuclear Medicine Studies in the United States and Worldwide: Frequency, Radiation Dose, and Comparison with Other Radiation Sources-1950-2007, Radiology 253 (2), 520-531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Owlia M., Yu L., Deible C., Hughes M.A., Jovin F., Bump G.M. (2014) Head CT Scan Overuse in Frequently Admitted Medical Patients, American Journal of Medicine 127 (5), 406-410. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perisinakis K., Raissaki M., Theocharopoulos N., Damilakis J., Gourtsoyiannis N. (2005) Reduction of eye lens radiation dose by orbital bismuth shielding in pediatric patients undergoing CT of the head: a Monte Carlo study, Med. Phys. 32 (4), 1024-1030. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vollmar S.V., Kalender W.A. (2008) Reduction of dose to the female breast in thoracic CT: a comparison of standard-protocol, bismuth-shielded, partial and tube-current-modulated CT examinations, Eur. Radiol. 18 (8) 1674-1682. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Vorona G.A., Zuccoli G., Sutcavage T., Clayton B.L., Ceschin R.C., Panigrahy A. (2013) The Use of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction in Pediatric Head CT: A Feasibility Study, Am. J. Neuroradiol. 34 (1), 205-211. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Wang J., Duan X., Christner J.A., Leng S., Grant K.L., McCollough C.H. (2012) Bismuth Shielding, Organ-based Tube Current Modulation, and Global Reduction of Tube Current for Dose Reduction to the Eye at Head CT, Radiology 262 (1), 191-198. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Yeoman L.J., Howarth L., Britten A., Cotterill A., Adam E.J. (1992) Gantry angulation in brain CT: dosage implications, effect on posterior fossa artifacts, and current international practice, Radiology 184 (1), 113-116. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.