Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 50, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2015
Page(s) 19 - 25
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2014023
Published online 09 January 2015
  • American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. [Google Scholar]
  • BEIR (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII phase 2, http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11340.html. [Google Scholar]
  • Brindhaban A., Eze C.U. (2006) Estimation of radiation dose during diagnostic X-ray examinations of newborn babies and 1-year-old infants, Medical Principles and Practice 15 (4), 260-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaparian A., Aghabagheri M. (2013) Fetal radiation doses and subsequent risks from X-ray examinations: Should we be concerned?, Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 11 (11), 899-904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaparian A. et al. (2014) Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation, J. Med. Phys. 39 (1), 32-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke R. et al. (1993) ICRP Publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). [Google Scholar]
  • Cook J.V. (2001) Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology, Imaging 13 (4), 229-238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dauer L.T. et al. (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients, Am. J. Roentgenol. 196 (4), 756-761. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eckerman K.F. et al. (1996) The ORNL mathematical phantom series, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  • Fotakis M. et al. (2003) Radiation doses to paediatric patients up to 5 years of age undergoing micturating cystourethrography examinations and its dependence on patient age: a Monte Carlo study, Br. J. Radiol. 76 (911), 812-817. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frank E.D. et al. (2013) Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning and procedures. Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall E.J. (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology, Pediatric Radiology 32 (10), 700-706. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hart D., Wall B. (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations, Eur. J. Radiol. 50 (3), 285-291. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hart D. et al. (2009) National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, Br. J. Radiol. 82 (973), 1-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W. (2002) Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients, Pediatric Radiology 32 (4), 272-279. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keijzers G.B., Britton C.J. (2010) Doctors’ knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department, Medical Journal of Australia 193 (8), 450-453. [Google Scholar]
  • Khong P. et al. (2013) ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology, Ann. ICRP 42 (2), 1-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiljunen T. et al. (2009) Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland, Acta Radiologica 50 (1), 114-124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazonakis M. et al. (2004) Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography, Pediatric Radiology 34 (8), 624-629. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough C.H. et al. (2010) How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? Am. J. Roentgenol. 194 (4), 890-896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mihai L.T. et al. (2005) Ionizing radiationunderstanding and acceptance, Health Phys. 89 (4), 375-382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mountford P., Temperton D. (1992) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP) 1990, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 19 (2), 77-79. [Google Scholar]
  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (1988) Quality Assurance for Diagnostic Imaging, NCRP Report No. 99. [Google Scholar]
  • Olowookere C. et al. (2011) Patient dosimetry during chest, abdomen, skull and neck radiography in SW Nigeria, Radiography 17 (3), 245-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perlmutter N. et al. (1998) The quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 80 (1-3), 45-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradhan A. (2013) On the risk to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionizing radiation during medical imaging procedures-IOMP policy statement, J. Med. Phys. 38 (2), 57-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradhan A. et al. (2012) On the use of “effective dose”(E) in medical exposures, J. Med. Phys. 37 (2), 63-65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soye J., Paterson A. (2008) A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland, Br. J. Radiol. 81, 725-729. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tapiovaara M., Siiskonen T. (2008) A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. Finish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas K.E. et al. (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians, Pediatric Radiology 36 (8), 823-832. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valentin J. Ed. (2007) ICRP Publication 103: The 2007 recommandations of the international commission on radiological protection. Elsevier, Oxford. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.