Accès gratuit
Volume 50, Numéro 1, Janvier-Mars 2015
Page(s) 19 - 25
Section Articles
Publié en ligne 9 janvier 2015
  • American Association of Physicists in Medicine (2011) AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. [Google Scholar]
  • BEIR (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, BEIR VII phase 2, [Google Scholar]
  • Brindhaban A., Eze C.U. (2006) Estimation of radiation dose during diagnostic X-ray examinations of newborn babies and 1-year-old infants, Medical Principles and Practice 15 (4), 260-265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaparian A., Aghabagheri M. (2013) Fetal radiation doses and subsequent risks from X-ray examinations: Should we be concerned?, Iran. J. Reprod. Med. 11 (11), 899-904. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Chaparian A. et al. (2014) Reduction of radiation risks in patients undergoing some X-ray examinations by using optimal projections: A Monte Carlo program-based mathematical calculation, J. Med. Phys. 39 (1), 32-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Clarke R. et al. (1993) ICRP Publication 60: 1990 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Ann. ICRP 21 (1-3). [Google Scholar]
  • Cook J.V. (2001) Radiation protection and quality assurance in paediatric radiology, Imaging 13 (4), 229-238. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dauer L.T. et al. (2011) Fears, feelings, and facts: interactively communicating benefits and risks of medical radiation with patients, Am. J. Roentgenol. 196 (4), 756-761. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Eckerman K.F. et al. (1996) The ORNL mathematical phantom series, Oak Ridge National Laboratory. [Google Scholar]
  • Fotakis M. et al. (2003) Radiation doses to paediatric patients up to 5 years of age undergoing micturating cystourethrography examinations and its dependence on patient age: a Monte Carlo study, Br. J. Radiol. 76 (911), 812-817. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frank E.D. et al. (2013) Merrill’s atlas of radiographic positioning and procedures. Elsevier Health Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  • Hall E.J. (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology, Pediatric Radiology 32 (10), 700-706. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hart D., Wall B. (2004) UK population dose from medical X-ray examinations, Eur. J. Radiol. 50 (3), 285-291. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hart D. et al. (2009) National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK, Br. J. Radiol. 82 (973), 1-12. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W. (2002) Effective doses to adult and pediatric patients, Pediatric Radiology 32 (4), 272-279. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keijzers G.B., Britton C.J. (2010) Doctors’ knowledge of patient radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging requested in the emergency department, Medical Journal of Australia 193 (8), 450-453. [Google Scholar]
  • Khong P. et al. (2013) ICRP Publication 121: radiological protection in paediatric diagnostic and interventional radiology, Ann. ICRP 42 (2), 1-63. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiljunen T. et al. (2009) Organ doses and effective doses in pediatric radiography: patient-dose survey in Finland, Acta Radiologica 50 (1), 114-124. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazonakis M. et al. (2004) Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography, Pediatric Radiology 34 (8), 624-629. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McCollough C.H. et al. (2010) How effective is effective dose as a predictor of radiation risk? Am. J. Roentgenol. 194 (4), 890-896. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mihai L.T. et al. (2005) Ionizing radiationunderstanding and acceptance, Health Phys. 89 (4), 375-382. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Mountford P., Temperton D. (1992) Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection (ICRP) 1990, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 19 (2), 77-79. [Google Scholar]
  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. (1988) Quality Assurance for Diagnostic Imaging, NCRP Report No. 99. [Google Scholar]
  • Olowookere C. et al. (2011) Patient dosimetry during chest, abdomen, skull and neck radiography in SW Nigeria, Radiography 17 (3), 245-249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Perlmutter N. et al. (1998) The quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images in paediatrics, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 80 (1-3), 45-48. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradhan A. (2013) On the risk to low doses (<100 mSv) of ionizing radiation during medical imaging procedures-IOMP policy statement, J. Med. Phys. 38 (2), 57-58. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pradhan A. et al. (2012) On the use of “effective dose”(E) in medical exposures, J. Med. Phys. 37 (2), 63-65. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Soye J., Paterson A. (2008) A survey of awareness of radiation dose among health professionals in Northern Ireland, Br. J. Radiol. 81, 725-729. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tapiovaara M., Siiskonen T. (2008) A Monte Carlo program for calculating patient doses in medical x-ray examinations. Finish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety, Helsinki. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomas K.E. et al. (2006) Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians, Pediatric Radiology 36 (8), 823-832. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Valentin J. Ed. (2007) ICRP Publication 103: The 2007 recommandations of the international commission on radiological protection. Elsevier, Oxford. [Google Scholar]

Les statistiques affichées correspondent au cumul d'une part des vues des résumés de l'article et d'autre part des vues et téléchargements de l'article plein-texte (PDF, Full-HTML, ePub... selon les formats disponibles) sur la platefome Vision4Press.

Les statistiques sont disponibles avec un délai de 48 à 96 heures et sont mises à jour quotidiennement en semaine.

Le chargement des statistiques peut être long.