Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 49, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2014
Page(s) 115 - 121
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2013090
Published online 19 February 2014
  • Ashok K., Sukhpal S., Gurmel S.M., Kulwant S.T. (2007) Studies on Effective Atomic Numbers and Electron Densities in Some Commonly Used Solvents, Nucl. Sci. Eng. 155, 102-108. [Google Scholar]
  • Berger M.J., Hubbell J.H., Seltzer S.M., Chang J., Coursey J.S., Sukumar R., Zucker D.S., Olsen K. (2010) XCOM: photon cross sections database, NIST standard reference database (XGAM), http://www.nist.gov/pml/data/xcom/index.cfm. [Google Scholar]
  • Demir D., Tursucu A., Oznuluer T. (2012) Studies on mass attenuation coefficient, effective atomic number and electron densitiy of some vitamins, Radiat. Environ. Biophys. DOI: 10.1007/s00411-012-0427-8. [Google Scholar]
  • Elias S., Zainal A.S., Anuar A., Husin W. (1983) Determination of effective atomic number of rubber, Pertanika 6, 95-98. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferreira C.C., Ximenes R.E., Garcia C.A.B., Viera J.W., Maia A.F. (2010) Total mass attenuation coefficient evaluation of ten materials commonly used to simulate human tissue, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 249, 1-5. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gerward L., Guilbert N., Jensen K.B., Levring H. (2004) WinXCom – a program for calculating X-ray attenuation coefficients, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 71, 653-654. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Hubbell J.H. (1982) Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients from 1 keV to 20 MeV, Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 33, 1269-1290. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRU (1989) International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. Tissue substitutes in radiation dosimetry and measurement, Report No. 44, Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • Jackson D.F., Hawkers D.J. (1981) X-ray attenuation coefficient of the elements and mixtures, Phys. Rep. 70, 169-233. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kiran T.K., Venkata K.R. (1997) Effective atomic numbers for materials of dosimetric interest, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 50 (6), 545-553. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Koç N., Özyol H. (2000) Z-dependence of partial and total photon interactions in some biological samples, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 59, 339-345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kucuk N., Cakir M., Isitman N.A. (2013) Mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for some polymers, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 153 (1), 127-134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kulwant S., Gagandeep K., Sandhu G.K., Lark B.S. (2001) Interaction of photons with some solutions, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 61, 537-540. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manjunathguru V., Umesh T.K. (2006) Effective atomic number and electron densities of some biologically important compounds containing H, C, N and O in energy range 145-1330 keV, J. Phys. B 39, 3969-3981. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Manohara S.R., Hanagodimath S.M., Thind K.S., Gerward L. (2008) On the effective atomic number and electron density: A comprehensive set of formulas for all types of materials and energies above 1 keV, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. B 266, 3906-3912. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Michael E.W. et al. (2013) Atomic weight of elements 2011 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem. 85 (05), 1047-1078. [Google Scholar]
  • Murat K., Yuksel O. (2011) Energy absorption and exposure buildup factors for some polymer and tissue substitute materials: photon energy, penetration depth and chemical composition dependency, J. Radiol. Prot. 31, 117-128. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nowotny R. (1998) XMuDat: Photon attenuation data on PC. IAEA-NDS-195, Vienna, Austria. Available on http://www-nds.iaea.org/publications/iaea-nds/iaea-nds-0195.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Parthsaradhi K., Esposito A., Pelliccioni M. (1992) Photon attenuation coefficients in tissue equivalent compound, Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 43 (12), 1481-1484. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Prasanna K.S., Manjunathguru V., Umesh T.K. (2010) Effective atomic numbers of some H-, C-, O- based composite materials derived from differential incoherent scattering cross section, Pramana 74 (4), 555-562. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shivalinge G., Krishnaveni S., Ramakrishna G. (2005) Studies on effective atomic numbers and electron densities in amino acids and sugars in the energy range 30-1333 keV, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 239 (4), 361-369. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shivaramu R., Vijayakumar L., Rajasekaran N.R. (2001) Effective atomic numbers for photon energy absorption of some low-Z substances of dosimetric interest, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 62, 371-377. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh V.P., Badiger N.M. (2012) Effective atomic numbers, electron densities and tissue equivalence of some gases and mixtures for dosimetry of radiation detectors, Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection 27 (2), 117-124. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Singh V.P., Badiger N.M. (2013) Study of effective atomic numbers and electron densities, kerma of alcohols: phantom and human organ tissue substitues, Nuclear Technology & Radiation Protection, 28 (2), 137-145 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Taylor M.L., Smith R.L., Dossing F., Franich R.D. (2012) Robust calculation of effective atomic numbers: The Auto-Zeff software, Med. Phys. 39, 1769-1778. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tejbir S., Naresh K., Parjit S.S. (2009) Chemical composition dependency of exposure buildup factors for some polymers, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 36, 114-120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tejbir S., Rajni Updesh K., Parjit S.S. (2010) Photon energy absorption parameters for some polymers, Ann. Nucl. Eng. 37, 422-427. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.