Free Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 47, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2012
Page(s) 543 - 551
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2012020
Published online 31 August 2012
  • Amakom C.M., Jibiri N.N. (2010) Chemical and radiological risk assessment of uranium in borehole and well waters in the Odeda Area, Ogun State, Nigeria, Int. J. Phys. Sci. 5, 1009-1014.
  • Dang H.S., Jaiswal D.D., Parameswaran M., Krishnamony S. (1994) Physical Anatomical, Physiological and Metabolic Data for Reference Man-A Proposal. BARC/1994/E/043.
  • Dang H.S., Jaiswal D.D., Parameswaran M., Deodhar K.P., Krishnamony S. (1996) Age Dependent Physical and Anatomical Indian Data for application in Internal Dosimetry, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 63, 217-222.
  • Giri S., Singh G., Jha V.N. (2011) Evaluation of radionuclides in groundwater around proposed uranium mining sites in Bagjata and Banduhurang, Jharkhand (India), Radioprotection 46, 39-57. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences]
  • Graham J. (1993) The legacy of one in a million in risk in perspective, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Risk Perspective 1, 1-2. [CrossRef]
  • Guglielmotti M., Ubios A, Larumbe J, Cabrini R. (1989) Tetracycline in uranyl nitrate intoxication: its action on renal damage and U retention in bone, Health Phys. 57, 403-405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Jain S.C., Mehta S.C., Kumar B., Reddy A.R., Nagaratnam A. (1995) Formulation of the Reference Indian Adult: Anatomical and Physiological Data, Health Phys. 68, 509-522. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Keith M.S., Spoo W., Corocoran J. (1999) Toxicological profile for uranium (update). ATSDR, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Kelly K.E. (1991) The Myth of 10-6 as a Definition of "Acceptable Risk", Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, June 16-21.
  • Kolthoff I.M., Elving P.J. (1962) Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part II, Vol. 9.
  • Kurttio P., Auvinen A., Salonen L. (2002) Renal Effects of Uranium in Drinking Water, Environ. Health Perspect. 110 (4), 337-342. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Kurttio P., Komulainen H., Leino A., Salonen L., Auvinen A., Saha H. (2005) Bone as a possible target of chemical toxicity of natural uranium in drinking water, Environ. Health Perspect. 113, 68-72. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Larivière D., Packer A.P., Mario L., Li C., Chen J., Cornett R.J. (2007) Age dependence of natural uranium and thorium concentrations in bone, Health Phys. 92, 119-126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Leggett R.W. (1989) The behavior and chemical toxicity of uranium in the kidney: a reassessment, Health Phys. 57, 365-383. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Lohner T.W. (1997) Is 10-6 an appropriate de minimus cancer risk goal? Risk Policy Report, April 18, 31-33.
  • Travis C.C., Richter S.A., Crouch E.A.C., Wilson R., Klema E.D. (1987) Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory agencies, Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 415-420. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, United Nations, New York. 1, 126-127.
  • US-EPA (1989) Health Effect Assessments Summary Tables (HEAST) and user’s Guide, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  • US-EPA (1991) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals), Publication 9285.7-01B, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA.
  • US-EPA (1993) Carcinogenicity assessment. IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System), 2003; US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Internet: www.epa.gov/iris
  • US-EPA (1994a) The Integrated Risk Information Service (IRIS) Online, Office of Environmental Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  • US-EPA (1994b) Comparison of Health Risks Arising From the Radiological and Chemical Toxicity of Uranium, Appendix F of Radiation Site Cleanup Regulations: Technical Support Document For The Development Of Radionuclide Cleanup Levels For Soil, Review Draft, EPA 402-R-96- 011 A, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  • US-EPA (1999) Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclide, Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA-402-R-99-001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN; US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  • US-EPA (2003) Current Drinking Water Standards, Ground water and drinking water protection agency, pp. 1-12. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
  • WHO (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Recommendations by World Health Organization, Edition: 3, Published by World Health Organization.
  • WHO (2008) Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Published by World Health Organization.
  • WHO (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Chemical hazards in drinking-water – Uranium, Edition: 4, Published by World Health Organization.
  • Ye-shin K., Hoa-sung P., Jin-yong K., Sun-ku P., Byong-wook C., Ig-hwan S., Dong-Chun S. (2004) Health risk assessment for uranium in Korean groundwater, J. Environ. Radioact. 77, 77-85. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  • Zamora M.L., Tracy B.L., Zielinski J.M., Meyerhof D.P., Moss M.A. (1998) Chronic Ingestion of Uranium in Drinking Water: A Study of Kidney Bioeffects in Humans, Toxicol. Sci. 43, 31-45. [CrossRef]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.