Free Access
Volume 47, Number 4, Octobre-Décembre 2012
Page(s) 543 - 551
Section Articles
Published online 31 August 2012
  • Amakom C.M., Jibiri N.N. (2010) Chemical and radiological risk assessment of uranium in borehole and well waters in the Odeda Area, Ogun State, Nigeria, Int. J. Phys. Sci. 5, 1009-1014. [Google Scholar]
  • Dang H.S., Jaiswal D.D., Parameswaran M., Krishnamony S. (1994) Physical Anatomical, Physiological and Metabolic Data for Reference Man-A Proposal. BARC/1994/E/043. [Google Scholar]
  • Dang H.S., Jaiswal D.D., Parameswaran M., Deodhar K.P., Krishnamony S. (1996) Age Dependent Physical and Anatomical Indian Data for application in Internal Dosimetry, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 63, 217-222. [Google Scholar]
  • Giri S., Singh G., Jha V.N. (2011) Evaluation of radionuclides in groundwater around proposed uranium mining sites in Bagjata and Banduhurang, Jharkhand (India), Radioprotection 46, 39-57. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Graham J. (1993) The legacy of one in a million in risk in perspective, Harvard Center for Risk Analysis, Risk Perspective 1, 1-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Guglielmotti M., Ubios A, Larumbe J, Cabrini R. (1989) Tetracycline in uranyl nitrate intoxication: its action on renal damage and U retention in bone, Health Phys. 57, 403-405. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Jain S.C., Mehta S.C., Kumar B., Reddy A.R., Nagaratnam A. (1995) Formulation of the Reference Indian Adult: Anatomical and Physiological Data, Health Phys. 68, 509-522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Keith M.S., Spoo W., Corocoran J. (1999) Toxicological profile for uranium (update). ATSDR, US Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • Kelly K.E. (1991) The Myth of 10-6 as a Definition of "Acceptable Risk", Presented at the 84th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air and Waste Management Association, Vancouver, BC, June 16-21. [Google Scholar]
  • Kolthoff I.M., Elving P.J. (1962) Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, Part II, Vol. 9. [Google Scholar]
  • Kurttio P., Auvinen A., Salonen L. (2002) Renal Effects of Uranium in Drinking Water, Environ. Health Perspect. 110 (4), 337-342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kurttio P., Komulainen H., Leino A., Salonen L., Auvinen A., Saha H. (2005) Bone as a possible target of chemical toxicity of natural uranium in drinking water, Environ. Health Perspect. 113, 68-72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Larivière D., Packer A.P., Mario L., Li C., Chen J., Cornett R.J. (2007) Age dependence of natural uranium and thorium concentrations in bone, Health Phys. 92, 119-126. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leggett R.W. (1989) The behavior and chemical toxicity of uranium in the kidney: a reassessment, Health Phys. 57, 365-383. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lohner T.W. (1997) Is 10-6 an appropriate de minimus cancer risk goal? Risk Policy Report, April 18, 31-33. [Google Scholar]
  • Travis C.C., Richter S.A., Crouch E.A.C., Wilson R., Klema E.D. (1987) Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory agencies, Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 415-420. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR (2000) United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation, Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes, United Nations, New York. 1, 126-127. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1989) Health Effect Assessments Summary Tables (HEAST) and user’s Guide, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1991) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund: Volume 1 Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part B, Development of Risk-based Preliminary Remediation Goals), Publication 9285.7-01B, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1993) Carcinogenicity assessment. IRIS (Integrated Risk Information System), 2003; US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. Internet: [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1994a) The Integrated Risk Information Service (IRIS) Online, Office of Environmental Health and Environmental Assessment, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati, OH. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1994b) Comparison of Health Risks Arising From the Radiological and Chemical Toxicity of Uranium, Appendix F of Radiation Site Cleanup Regulations: Technical Support Document For The Development Of Radionuclide Cleanup Levels For Soil, Review Draft, EPA 402-R-96- 011 A, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (1999) Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclide, Federal Guidance Report No. 13, EPA-402-R-99-001, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN; US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • US-EPA (2003) Current Drinking Water Standards, Ground water and drinking water protection agency, pp. 1-12. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (2004) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Recommendations by World Health Organization, Edition: 3, Published by World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (2008) Meeting the MDG drinking water and sanitation target: the urban and rural challenge of the decade. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Published by World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • WHO (2011) Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Chemical hazards in drinking-water – Uranium, Edition: 4, Published by World Health Organization. [Google Scholar]
  • Ye-shin K., Hoa-sung P., Jin-yong K., Sun-ku P., Byong-wook C., Ig-hwan S., Dong-Chun S. (2004) Health risk assessment for uranium in Korean groundwater, J. Environ. Radioact. 77, 77-85. [Google Scholar]
  • Zamora M.L., Tracy B.L., Zielinski J.M., Meyerhof D.P., Moss M.A. (1998) Chronic Ingestion of Uranium in Drinking Water: A Study of Kidney Bioeffects in Humans, Toxicol. Sci. 43, 31-45. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.