Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 91 - 98 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024042 | |
Published online | 14 March 2025 |
Article
Determination of decay tank capacity and minimum storage time for liquid radioactive effluent based on environmental requirements
Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
* Corresponding Author: huaxie_geyunwen@163.com
Received:
3
July
2024
Accepted:
28
August
2024
According to China’s environmental protection requirements, liquid radioactive effluent containing excreta from patients undergoing radionuclide treatments, such as iodine-131 and lutetium-177, must be temporarily stored in decay tanks until it meets discharge standards. The specific and total activity of the discharged liquid effluent is strictly regulated by China’s environmental standards and regulatory documents. Before constructing a nuclear medicine department, hospitals must conduct an environmental impact assessment (EIA) and obtain approval from regulatory authorities. In the EIA, hospitals must demonstrate that the intended capacity of the decay tanks and the storage time for liquid effluent during the operation of the nuclear medicine department will ensure compliance with regulatory discharge requirements. This paper introduces the regulatory requirements for the discharge of radioactive effluent. This paper presents a formula for calculating the activity of iodine-131 and lutetium-177 in decay tanks. Based on the constraining environment requirements in practice, this paper provides a method for determining the necessary decay tank capacity and minimum storage time for liquid radioactive effluent to ensure compliant discharge. The findings offer guidance for the construction of decay tanks, the management of liquid effluent discharge in nuclear medicine departments, and inspection by regulatory authorities.
Key words: hospital / decay tank / liquid radioactive effluent / iodine-131 / lutecium-177
© G. Yunwen, Published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
1 Introduction
Currently, in China, 131I radionuclide is primarily used for thyroid cancer treatment in nuclear medicine departments, while the usage of 177Lu and the number of patients treated with it are also increasing. According to the Medium and Long-term Development Plan for Medical Isotopes (2021–2035) (CAEA et al., 2021), the usage of 131I in China was 3.7 × 1014 Bq in 2019, with an expected annual growth rate of 15%. 177Lu is highly effective in treating neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. The usage of 177Lu was 1.85 × 1012Bq, with domestic demand projected to grow at an annual rate of 30%. According to the data from the National Radiation Safety Management System for Nuclear Utilization, as of the end of December 2023, about 100 hospitals had obtained radiation safety licenses for using 177Lu, and many more hospitals were planning to apply for such licenses.
The Medium and Long-term Development Plan for Medical Isotopes (2021–2035) aims to establish at least one nuclear medicine department in each county across China by 2035. Following the release of this plan, the construction of nuclear medicine departments in China has significantly accelerated, with many new departments planning to set up treatment wards for radionuclide therapy using 131I or 177Lu. The management of patients undergoing radionuclide therapy varies across countries (Barquero et al.,2008). For instance, since the late 20th century, the United States has not required patients treated with 131I to be hospitalized, allowing their excreta to enter municipal sewage systems directly (US NRC, 1997). In contrast, China and most European countries, following recommendations from the International Atomic Energy Agency and other organizations, require patients to be hospitalized until the 131I level in the patient’ s body meets certain standards (ICRP, 1991; IAEA, 2002). During hospitalization, the excreta of patients containing 131I is stored in decay tanks until it meets discharge requirements. Regarding 177Lu therapy, currently, it is not explicitly required in China for patients receiving 177Lu treatment to be hospitalized. Medical institutions generally adopt an outpatient treatment model where patients receive injections in the morning and are released in the afternoon, with their excreta entering the decay tanks during this period.
2 Materials and methods
This paper is the original work of the author, composed without AI assistance. Post-initial drafting, Kimi (a generative AI tool, developers have not specified version information) was utilized solely for linguistic refinement, including grammar correction and word suggestion, to enhance the manuscript’s clarity. Kimi was mainly used in Section 4.1.
3 Requirements for the discharge of liquid radioactive effluent containing 131I and 177Lu
Should the liquid radioactive waste be directly discharged into the sewer system, the annual dose for workers within the sewer system may potentially exceed the regulatory limit of 0.1mSv. To minimize the radiological risks to both workers and the general public, China has established stringent regulatory standards. In this chapter, the standards for 131I and 177Lu are introduced.
3.1 Iodine-131
In September 2023, the Department of Radiation Source Safety Regulation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment issued the Reply to Consultation on Several Clauses of the Nuclear Medicine Standard (Department of Radiation Source Safety Regulation of Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2023) publicly, which clarifies that the liquid radioactive effluent containing 131I in decay tanks can be discharged according to any one of the following methods:
According to Article 8.6.2 of the Basic standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources(GB 18871) (AQSIQ, 2002), upon confirmation by the regulatory authorities, the activity of 131I in the liquid effluent discharged into the regular sewer system should not exceed 1 ALImin (9 × 105 Bq) per single discharge, and the total activity of 131I in the liquid effluent discharged per month should not exceed 10 ALImin (9 × 106 Bq).
If liquid effluent has been stored up to 180 days, it can be discharged directly.
Liquid effluent stored for less than 180 days can also be discharged if monitoring results show that the specific activity of 131I has decreased to 10 Bq/L or below.
According to Sections B1.3.4 and B1.3.5 of GB 18871, the calculation formula for ALImin is as follows:
(1)
Among them, DL is the annual effective dose limit, which should be taken as 20mSv. ej is the larger value between the corresponding values of the committed effective dose per unit intake of a certain radionuclide j via inhalation or ingestion. According to Table B3 of GB 18871, for 131I, ej should be taken as 2.2 × 10−8 Sv/Bq. Substituting these values into the calculation, the ALImin for iodine-131 is 9 × 105 Bq.
It can be demonstrated that, among the three methods mentioned above, discharging according to the method specified in GB 18871 is most beneficial for hospital operations:
Firstly, assuming that the specific activity of 131I is 10 Bq/L, if the monthly discharge of 131I reaches the limit specified in GB 18871, which is 9 × 106 Bq, the corresponding volume of liquid radioactive effluent would be:
(2)
In practice, the monthly volume of liquid radioactive effluent produced from hospital wards treating with 131I is far below 900 m3. Therefore, discharging according to GB 18871, is easier for operation than storing liquid effluent until the specific activity reaches 10 Bq/L.
Secondly, if a hospital chooses to discharge after a storage period of 180 days and assuming the monthly total activity of 131I in the discharged liquid effluent is 9 × 106 Bq, the activity of 131I in the decay tank can be calculated as:
(3)
Among the above formula, 0.0864/d is the decay constant for 131I.
In 2019, the total usage of 131I across all of China was only 3.7 × 1014 Bq. The monthly usage of 131I in a single hospital’s nuclear medicine department is definitely far lower than 5.10 × 1013 Bq. Considering decay, the accumulated total activity of 131I in the decay tank when full is even lower than 5.10 × 1013 Bq. Therefore, discharging according to GB 18871 is easier for operation than discharging after storing liquid effluent for 180 days.
According to the analysis presented in the above, if either a storage period of up to 180 days is met or the activity concentration of 10 Bq/L is achieved, the discharged radioactivity will not surpass the permissible threshold. Conversely, if these conditions are not met, the limit is still likely to be not exceeded. Since medical institutions have the option to select any one of the three methods outlined in Section 3.1 for the disposal of decay tank water, a rational operator would opt for the approach that confers the greatest benefit. Consequently, it is anticipated that all hospitals will prefer the method delineated in the national standard GB 18871. Therefore, the discharge limit established by GB 18871 serves as the regulatory criterion for the effluent liquid containing 131I.
3.2 Lutecium-177
Discharging 177Lu is subject to dual restrictions on both the specific activity and the total activity.
Total activity limit: similar to 131I, the maximum allowable total activity of 177Lu that can be discharged by medical institutions per single discharge is determined to be no more than 1 ALImin. According to Sections B1.3.4 and B1.3.5 of GB 18871, the ALImin for Lu-177 is:
(4)
where 1.0 × 10−9 Sv/Bq is the corresponding value of the committed effective dose per unit intake of 177Lu via inhalation and is cited from Table B3 of GB 18871. The monthly discharged activity of 177Lu must not exceed 10 ALImin, which is 2.0 × 108 Bq.
Specific activity: according to the Discharge standard of water pollutants for medical organization (GB 18466) (SBEP et al., 2005), the specific activity of total beta-emitting radionuclides at the outlet of the decay tank must not exceed 10 Bq/L, which means the specific activity of 177Lu must not exceed 10 Bq/L. If the specific activity of the liquid radioactive effluent is 10 Bq/L, it would require discharging 2.0 × 104 m3of liquid effluent to reach the monthly maximum allowable discharged activity specified in Section 8.6.2 of GB 18871, whereas the nuclear medicine department generates far less than 2.0 × 104 m3of liquid effluent per month.
Upon the evaluation of this section, it is evident that compliance with the specific activity requirement inherently ensures adherence to the total activity requirement. Therefore, for 177Lu, the limit on specific activity serves as the practical requirement.
4 Radioactivity in the decay tank
To figure out the minimum storage time and to determine the requisite volume of decay tanks, it is essential to quantify the total radioactivity within the decay tanks. This chapter delineates a methodology for estimating the radioactivity in decay tanks.
4.1 Iodine-131
Assuming full-load continuous operation without any interruptions, the hospitalization cycle is 3 days, and the proportions of the excreted activity relative to the administered activity are denoted as P1, P2, and P3, respectively. The decay constant for 131I is denoted as λ. The average dose administered to a single patient is denoted as A, and the number of patients per hospitalization cycle is denoted as N.
For a decay tank filled after T days of operation, the activity contained in the first day’s excreta of patients is P1NA. Assume that the tank is full after T days of operation, the residual activity of the first day’s excreta of the first batch of patients is P1NAexp(–λ(T–1)) when the tank is full. Similarly, it can be derived that the residual activity of the first day’s excreta of the first batch of patients is P1NAexp(-λ(T − 4)) when then tank is full. Summing all the terms and using the geometric series sum formula, the activity due to the first day’s excreta of the patients (denoted as D1) when the tank is full can be calculated as:
(5)
In the above equation, n = T/3 represents the number of hospitalization cycles from the empty to full state of the decay tank. For instance, if the decay tank takes 60 days to fill up, the value of n would be 20. For ease of calculation, T = 3n is assumed, where n is an integer.
Using the same method, the activity due to the second, the third day’s excreta of the patients when the tank is full (denoted as D2, D3), can be calculated respectively as follows:
(6)
(7)
The retention ratio of 131I within cells is related to cellular metabolic activity (Wyszomirska, 2012). Typically, it is assumed that 30% of 131I is retained in the body while 70% is excreted through urine (Clarke, 1994; Ward, 2006). However, for radiation protection, a conservative approach should be taken. Referring to ICRP Publication 94, the values of P1, P2, P3 are taken as 55%, 22%, and 6%, respectively (Driver et al., 2001; ICRP, 2004;. The decay constant of 131I is 0.0864/day. Based on these parameters, the following results are obtained:
(8)
The total theoretical activity D of 131I in the decay tank, when it is full, can be calculated using the following formula:
(9)
In China, liquid effluent containing 131I generally needs to be stored for more than 10 half-lives, i.e., T ≥ 81 days. Under this condition, 1–exp(–λT) can be approximated as 1. Therefore, the theoretical activity of 131I can be approximated as kNA. In this formula, the value of k is related to the hospitalization cycle and the number of days it takes for the decay tank to fill. When the hospitalization cycle is 3 days and the number of days required to fill the decay tank is exactly a multiple of 3, the value of k is 3.16.
4.2 Lutecium-177
Similar to 131I, most of the 177Lu injected into the human body is excreted through the patient’s urine and other excreta (ICRP, 2004; Zaknun et al., 2013). According to available environmental impact assessment documents, hospitals planning to carry out 177Lu treatments generally administer the medication to patients on a specific day of the week, with patients receiving the injection in the morning and leaving in the evening, roughly resulting in a hospital stay of 6∼9 hours. During their stay, the excreta must enter the decay tank.
The average dose administered to a single patient is denoted as A, and the number of patients is denoted as N. The proportion of 177Lu excreted by the patient during their stay in the hospital is denoted as P. The value of P varies across studies. Levart et al. found that the retention rate of 177Lu in the body 18.1 hours post-administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE was approximately 36% (Levart et al., 2019). Esser JP’s team measured that approximately 71% and 81% of the administered dose of 177Lu-DOTATATE or 177Lu-DOTATOC, respectively, was excreted in urine within 24 hours (Esseret al., 2006). Kwekkeboom et al. indicated that about 64% of 177Lu was excreted in urine within the first 24 hours following the administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE (Kwekkeboom et al., 2001). Referring to the above results and the conservative principle, it is assumed that 50% of 177Lu is excreted during the patient’s stay, i.e., P = 0.5.
Assuming the decay tank fills in T = 7n + 1 days (the excreta of a new batch of patients enters the decay tank, resulting in higher activity levels than any other day in the 7-day cycle). Under this assumption, the total activity of 177Lu in the decay tank when it is full, denoted as D, is:
(10)
where λ is the decay constant of 177Lu.
In most cases, T ≥ 81 days, and 1–exp(–λT) can be approximated as 1. Therefore, the total activity of 177Lu in the tank can also be simplified to kNA. When T = 7n + 1, the value of k is 1.02. If T = 7n + 1 + g, the total activity of 177Lu in the tank can be considered as the activity at 7n + 1 days, further decayed by g days, that is kNA × exp(–λg).
5 Theoretical minimum storage days and required volume of decay tank
According to China’s regulatory requirements, the hospital needs to conduct an EIA and obtain approval from regulatory authorities before constructing a nuclear medicine department. The EIA document must determine the volume of the decay tank. The volume varies significantly, influenced by factors such as patient load, location, and notably, the year of the hospital’s establishment. Generally, hospitals founded prior to 2021 are equipped with 2 to 4 decay tanks, with individual tank volumes varying between 20 to 80 cubic meters. After the Radiation protection and safety requirements for nuclear medicine (HJ 1188) (Ministry of Ecology and Environment, 2021) was issued in 2021, the newly-built hospitals usually determine the volume of tanks based on a storage period of 180 days. As a result, the volume of decay tanks increases significantly. The hospitals typically possess 3 to 5 decay tanks, with tank volumes ranging from 60 to 120 cubic meters.
Utilizing the radioactivity levels within the decay tank as a foundation, this chapter presents a theoretical framework for calculating the minimum storage period and the requisite tank volume. Using the new framework, the required volume of the decay tanks can be significantly reduced while ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements.
5.1 Theoretical minimum decay days for 131I
Since the total activity specified in Section 8.6.2 of GB 18871 is the practical restriction for the discharge of 131I, Let Em represent the monthly allowable discharged activity (9 × 106 Bq) and Tmin represents the theoretical minimum decay days for 131I. Tmin should satisfy:
(11)
The volume of the decay tank, V, should satisfy:
(13)
where M represents the number of decay tanks, W1 represents the daily liquid effluent volume discharged into a decay tank. When equation (13) is taken as equality, the volume V obtained is the minimum required volume of the decay tanks. Table 1 shows the minimum required volume of the decay tank for different numbers of patients, assuming an average dose of 7.4 GBq per patient, a hospitalization cycle of 3 days, and 3 decay tanks.
Minimum storage time and volume of decay tank required for 131I.
5.2 Theoretical minimum decay days for Lutecium-177
Since the specific activity of 177Lu at the outlet of the decay tank must not exceed 10 Bq/L, Similarly, let Tmin represent the theoretical minimum decay days for 177Lu. Tmin should satisfy:
(14)
where kNA represents the activity when the decay tank is just filled, V is the volume of the decay tank. kNA/V is the specific activity of 177Lu. Equation (14) means that if the liquid effluent has been stored for Tmin, the specific activity of 177Lu complies with discharge criteria.
Assuming the number of decay tanks is M and the daily liquid effluent volume discharged into a decay tank is W1, the volume V of a single decay tank should satisfy:
(15)
When equation (15) is taken as equality, V obtained is the minimum required volume of the decay tank. W1 is roughly proportional to the number of patients, so W1 can be expressed as W0 × N, where W0 represents the daily water consumption per patient, and N is the number of patients per batch. Equation (15) can be rewritten as:
(16)
Substituting equation (17) into equation (14):
(18)
Let X = V/N, and substitute it into equation (18):
(19)
Assuming W0 is 0.11 m3 and the number of decay tanks M = 3, solving equation (19) gives X = V/N = 6.25 m3/person, meaning the volume of the decay tank required per patient is 6.25 m3; the corresponding minimum storage time is 113.6 days. Table 2 shows the required volume of the decay tank for different numbers of patients.
Minimum storage time and volume of decay tank required for 177Lu.
5.3 Minimum storage time considering both 177Lu and 131I exists in the decay tank
If a hospital uses both 131I and 177Lu for treatment, the storage time for liquid effluent should be the larger value between the minimum storage time for 131I and 177Lu. From Tables 1 and 2, it can be seen that under the assumed circumstance, the minimum storage time required for 177Lu is slightly larger when the number of patients is ≤9. When the number of patients is ≥10, the volume required for 131I exceeds that for 177Lu.
5.4 Actual measurement results
Currently, nuclear medicine departments in China’s hospitals mainly conduct 131I treatment, while 177Lu is still in clinical trial stages. Therefore, it is difficult to obtain monitoring data for 177Lu, so the actual measurement results mainly focus on 131I.
Four hospitals were selected, and the activity concentration of 131I in decay tanks when full was monitored. The results are shown in Table 3. From Table 3, it can be seen that:
The actual activity of 131I in the decay tanks when full is lower than the theoretically calculated value;
In the case of operation at full capacity (hospital No. 3), the actual measured value is close to the theoretically calculated value;
Based on the methods presented in this article, the monthly discharged activity of 131I from the four hospitals is below the discharge limit, complying with regulatory requirements.
Actual measurement results.
6 Discussion and analysis
According to the theoretical activity formula for 131I and 177Lu in a full decay tank, the total activity is proportional to the number of patients and the dosage per patient. The theoretical activity is derived under the assumption of the hospital operating at full capacity, with consecutive batches of patients and no intervals, and with conservative assumptions in terms of discharge ratio. Therefore, the result obtained from the calculation formula is actually the upper limit of the total activity of 131I or 177Lu in the tank.
For the 131I isotope, the minimum storage time Tmin is proportional to ln(N), where N is the number of patients. The volume of liquid effluent discharged into the decay tank from the 131I treatment ward per day is also proportional to N. According to equations (12) and (13), the volume of the decay tank required for 131I is proportional to N ln(N).
For the 177Lu isotope, the required minimum volume of the decay tank is directly proportional to the number of patients.
The daily water consumption per patient W0 has a significant influence on the required volume of decay tanks. For medical institutions with limited expandable land space, limiting the daily water consumption per patient can reduce the required volume of the decay tanks, thereby lowering land requirements and construction costs.
7 Conclusions
This paper presents the theoretical activity formulas for 131I and 177Lu in a full decay tank, demonstrating the limit on maximum allowable discharged activity specified in Section 8.6.2 of GB 18871and the specific activity of total beta-emitting radionuclides at the outlet of decay tanks specified in GB 18846 are the practical restrictions for the isotopes 131I and 177Lu, respectively. It also proposes a method for determining the decay tank volume and the minimum storage time for liquid effluent.
For hospitals and regulatory authorities, if the intended number of patients, hospitalization cycle, average dosage, daily liquid effluent volume discharged into the decay tank are determined, the method provided in this paper can be used to determine the required volume of decay tanks. The minimum storage time can also be calculated. For regulatory authorities, this serves as a basis for assessing whether the planned decay tank volume meets the requirements when approving environmental impact assessment documents.
Given that the theoretical activity derived in this paper represents the upper limit of the actual total activity of 131I or 177Lu in the decay tank, the actual total activity is often significantly lower than the theoretical calculation provided by this method. Therefore, if the storage time of the liquid radioactive effluent exceeds the calculated minimum storage time, it can be theoretically proven that the discharge meets regulatory requirements without the need for monitoring data. Actual monitoring results from four hospitals also proved the conclusion.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank the Provincial Radiation Station for providing the monitoring data support.
Funding
This research did not receive any specific funding.
Conflicts of interest
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.
Data availability statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Author contribution statement
This paper was solely authored by Ge Yunwen. She was responsible for the conception, design, data collection, analysis, and manuscript writing.
Ethics approval
Ethical approval was not required.
Informed consent
The article does not contain any studies involving human subjects.
Supplementary Material
Table B3 in GB 18871: provides committed effective dose per unit intake e(g) via inhalation and ingestion for radioactive isotopes. For iodine-131, the value is 7.6×10-9, 1.1×10-8, and 2.2×10-8 Sv/Bq. So, ej should be taken as 2.2×10-8 Sv/Bq. Access here
References
- Barquero R, Basurto F, Nunez C, et al. 2008. Liquid discharges from patients undergoing 131I treatments. J Environ Radioact 99: 1530–1534. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- China Atomic Energy Agency, Ministry of Science and Technology, Ministry of Ecology and Environment et al.2021. Medium and long-term development plan for medical isotopes. Available from: https://www.caea.gov.cn/n6760338/n6760342/c6831058/content.html. [Google Scholar]
- Clarke SEM. 1994. Radioiodine therapy of the thyroid. In Murray IPC, Ell PJ, eds. Nuclear Medicine in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment pp. 833-845. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Radiation Source Safety Regulation, Ministry of Ecology and Environment. 2023. Reply to Consultation on Several Clauses of the Nuclear Medicine Standard (Radiation Notice (2023) 20th). Available from: https://www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/sthjbsh/202309/t20230913_1040761.html [Reply to Consultation on Several Clauses of the Nuclear Medicine Standard]. [Google Scholar]
- Driver I, Packer S. 2001. Radioactive waste discharge quantities for patients undergoing radioactive iodine therapy for thyroid carcinoma. Nucl Med Commun 22: 1129. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Esser JP, Krenning EP, Teunissen JJM, et al. 2006. Comparison of [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotate and [(177)Lu-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]octreotide: which peptide is preferable for PRRT? Eur J Nucl Med Molec Imag 33: 1346–1351. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China.2002. Basic standards for protection against ionizing radiation and for the safety of radiation sources: GB 18871. Beijing: Standards Press of China. [Google Scholar]
- State Bureau of Environment Protection, General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine. 2005. Discharge Standard of water pollutants for medical organization: GB 18846. Beijing: Standards Press of China. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP.1991. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Oxford: Pergamon Press. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP. 2004. Release of Patients after Therapy with Unsealed Radionuclides. Ann. ICRP 34. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2004.08.001 [Google Scholar]
- International Atomic Energy Agency, Pan American Health Organization, World Health Organization. 2002. Radiological Protection for Medical Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: IAEA Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1. 5. Vienna:International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
- Kwekkeboom DJ, Bakker WH, Kooij PP, Konijnenberg MW, Srinivasan A, Erion JL, Schmidt MA, Bugaj JL, de Jong M, Krenning EP. 2001. [177Lu-DOTA0, Tyr3]octreotate: comparison with [111In-DTPA0]octreotide in patients. Eur J Nucl Med 28: 1319–1325. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Levart D, Kalogianni E, Corcoran B, et al. 2019. Radiation precautions for inpatient and outpatient 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumours. EJNMMI Phys 6: 7–7. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. 2021. Radiation Protection and Safety Requirements for Nuclear Medicine: HJ 1188—2021. Beijing: Environmental Science Press. [Google Scholar]
- US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 1997. Regulatory Guide 8. 39, Release of Patients Administered Radioactive Materials. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. [Google Scholar]
- Ward WF. 2006. Basic principles of radiation biology. In: Henkin R. E., Bova D., Dillehay G. L. et al. (Eds.) Nuclear Medicine pp. 507-522. Philadelphia: MOSBY ELSEVIER. [Google Scholar]
- Wyszomirska A. 2012. Iodine-131 for therapy of thyroid diseases. Physical and biological basis. Nuclear Medicine Review for Central and Eastern Europe 15: 120–123. [Google Scholar]
- Zaknun JJ, Bodei L,Mueller-Brand J et al. 2013. The joint IAEA, EANM, and SNMMI practical guidance on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRNT) in neuroendocrine tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Molec Imag 40: 800–816. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Cite this article as: Yunwen G. 2025. Determination of decay tank capacity and minimum storage time for liquid radioactive effluent based on environmental requirements. Radioprotection 60(1): 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024042
All Tables
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.