Open Access
Table 3
Comparison of scale scores by Source.
| PEMAT | jReadability | GQS1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understandability1 | Actionability1 | Understandability (> 70)2 | Actionability (> 70)2 | Readability Score1 | Number of words3 | Reading time, min3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| M | SD | M | SD | n | % | AR | n | % | AR | M | SD | Med | 25% | 75% | P-value | Med | 25% | 75% | P-value | M | SD | ||||||
| 1 | Municipalities | 76.7 | 13.9 | 4 < 1 | 75.2 | 23.2 | 3,4,5 < 1 | 36 | 66.7 | 1.1 | 34 | 63.0 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 1 < 3 | 7035 | 4761 | 9586 | 0.662 | 11.0 | 7.0 | 15.0 | 0.623 | 4.5 | 0.8 | 3,4 < 1 |
| 2 | Prefectures | 79.4 | 15.8 | 4 < 2 | 82.1 | 16.2 | 3,4,5 < 2 | 20 | 74.1 | 1.6 | 21 | 77.8 | 3.4 | 1.9 | 0.4 | 6225 | 1944 | 14472 | 10.0 | 3.0 | 22.0 | 4.6 | 0.9 | 3,4,5 < 2 | |||
| 3 | GOV* | 66.9 | 16.2 | 23.7 | 28.3 | 3 < 1,2 | 9 | 50.0 | -1.1 | 1 | 5.6 | -4.0 | 2.4 | 1.2 | 1 < 3 | 7846 | 4525 | 17319 | 12.0 | 7.3 | 26.5 | 3.4 | 0.9 | 3 < 1,2 | |||
| 4 | EDU* | 53.3 | 18.5 | 4 < 1,2,5 | 29.7 | 32.8 | 4 < 1,2 | 2 | 15.4 | -3.6 | 1 | 7.7 | -3.2 | 1.9 | 0.6 | 10523 | 3248 | 13628 | 16.0 | 5.0 | 21.0 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 4 < 1,2 | |||
| 5 | Businesses | 85.8 | 9.3 | 4 < 5 | 26.7 | 32.7 | 5 < 1,2 | 4 | 100.0 | 1.6 | 0 | 0.0 | -2.0 | 2.3 | 0.5 | 8052 | 3073 | 17294 | 12.0 | 4.8 | 26.8 | 3.3 | 1.0 | 5 < 2 | |||
1
ANOVA with a significance level of 5% was performed, and groups with significant differences were indicated by inequalities.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.