Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 1, January-March 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 109 - 119 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024023 | |
Published online | 14 March 2025 |
Article
Evaluating the overall quality of online information on nuclear power plant accidents in Japanese
1
Department of Community Nursing and Nursing Systems, Kitasato University, 1-15-1, Kitasato, Minami-ku, Sagamihara-city, Kanagawa, 252-0373 Japan
2
University hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Center, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
3
Department of Health Communication, School of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
* Corresponding author: shinyai@nrs.kitasato-u.ac.jp
Received:
26
April
2024
Accepted:
20
June
2024
Information on professionally produced materials is beyond the reading level of the average adult and is difficult to read and understand. Additionally, the readability of nuclear emergency preparedness manuals in Japan is not clear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the understandability, actionability, readability, and credibility of nuclear emergency preparedness manuals. A systematic quantitative content analysis of online materials was conducted from November 27 to December 8, 2023. The selection criteria were websites in Japanese related to nuclear disaster prevention and aimed at the general public. The PEMAT-P, jReadability, Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scale were used to evaluate each web page. The number of materials scoring 70 or higher on the PEMAT-P was 71 (61.2%) for understandability and 57 (49.1%) for actionability. Regarding the difficulty level of the texts by jReadability, “Difficult” was the most frequent response with 82 responses (70.7%). The JAMA Benchmark Criteria was 35.3% in 41 materials for attribution, 80.2% in 93 materials for currency, and a mean GQS of 4.1 (SD = 1.0). This study quantitatively evaluated the understandability, actionability, readability, and credibility of nuclear disaster prevention materials for the Japanese public. The findings suggest that text pertaining to nuclear disaster prevention materials may not be easily understood because it is beyond the reading comprehension of the average adult.
Key words: nuclear power / disaster prevention / health communication / patient education
© S. Ito et al., Published by EDP Sciences, 2025
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.