Table 1
Reference exposure levels for the population according to international organizations and countries, taking into account the phase of the accident for each country. Doses are expressed as an effective dose (E), all routes of exposure taken into account.
Organisation or country | Phases of the accident | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Emergency | Transition | Long-term | ||
ICRP | 100 mSv | – | 1–20 mSv | ICRP (2020) |
IAEA | 100 mSv | ≈20 mSv | 1–20 mSv | IAEA (2018) |
France | 100 mSv1 | 1–20 mSv | 1–20 mSv | CSP (2018a, 2018b, 2018c) |
Germany | 100 mSv2 | – | 1–20 mSv | SSK (2014, 2015) |
Belgium | 20–100 mSv | 20–100 mSv | 1–20 mSv | Moniteur Belge (2018) |
Nordic countries3 | 20–100 mSv2 | – | 1–20 mSv | STUK (2014) |
United Kingdom | 100 mSv | <100 mSv, with optimisation4 | <20 mSv | PHE (2019) |
Switzerland | 100 mSv2 | 100 mSv | 1–20 mSv | OFPP (2015) |
Canada5 | 20–100 mSv | 20–100 mSv | 1–20 mSv | CCSN (2018) |
United States6 | – | – | – | NCRP (2014) |
Spain7 | – | – | – | BOE (2004) |
With application of the principles of optimization and justification (CSP, 2018a, 2018b, 2018c).
The UK’s management doctrine insists on optimizing exposure during the transition phase, without providing a baseline.
The USA considers that the use of exposure reference levels does not adequately address considerations specific to the nature of the accident and its consequences (NCRP, 2014). The protection strategy is based solely on the guide values for protection actions (EPA, 2017).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.