Comparative study of nuclear post-accident management doctrines in Europe and North America

Free Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 57, Number 1, January-March 2022


Page(s)		9 - 16
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2022002
Published online		31 January 2022

ASN. 2012. Éléments de doctrine pour la gestion post-accidentelle d’un accident nucléaire. https://www.asn.fr/Prevenir-et-comprendre-l-accident/Gestion-post-accidentelle/Elements-de-doctrine. [Google Scholar]
ASN. 2020. Guide pour les habitants d’un territoire contaminé par un accident nucléaire. https://post-accident-nucleaire.fr/preparation-la-gestion-post-accidentelle-dun-accident-nucleaire. [Google Scholar]
Bertho JM, Gabillaud-Poillion F, Reuter C, Rivière O. 2021. Involvement of stakeholders during the preparedness phase of post-accident situation management. Ann. ICRP 50(supp1): 160–166. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BOE (Boletín Oficial del Estado, España). 2004. Real Decreto 1546/2004, de 25 de junio, por el que se aprueba el Plan Básico de Emergencia Nuclear. Última actualización publicada el 03/01/2020. BOE-A-2004-13061. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2004/BOE-A-2004-13061-consolidado.pdf. [Google Scholar]
BOE (Boletín Oficial del Estado, España). 2010. Real Decreto 1564/2010, de 19 de noviembre, por el que se aprueba la Directriz básica de planificación de protección civil ante el riesgo radiológico. BOE-A-2010-17808. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2010/11/20/pdfs/BOE-A-2010-17808.pdf. [Google Scholar]
CCSN. 2018. Gestion des urgences et protection-incendie, tome II : cadre pour le rétablissement après une urgence nucléaire REGDOC-2.10.1. http://www.nuclearsafety.gc.ca/pubs_catalogue/uploads/REGDOC-2-10-1-Emergency-Management-and-Fire-Protection-vol2-draft-eng.pdf. [Google Scholar]
CSP (Code de la santé publique). 2018a. Section 1 : principes généraux, articles L1333-1 à L-1333-6. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006072665/LEGISCTA000032010445?etatTexte=VIGUEUR&etatTexte=VIGUEUR_DIFF#LEGISCTA000032044833. [Google Scholar]
CSP (Code de la santé publique). 2018b. Section 4 : gestion des situations d’urgence radiologique articles R. 1333-81 à R. 1333-89. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006072665/LEGISCTA000006190974?query=R1333-81&typeRecherche=date&dateVersion=05%2F01%2F2021&nomCode=LHIW4Q%3D%3D&searchField=ALL&tab_selection=code&page=1&anchor=LEGISCTA000006190974#LEGISCTA000006190974. [Google Scholar]
CSP (Code de la santé publique). 2018c. Section 5 : gestion de situations d’exposition durable résultant d’une pollution par des substances radioactives, articles R1333-90 à R1333-96. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006072665/LEGISCTA000006191035/#LEGISCTA000037017354. [Google Scholar]
Code du travail. 2016. Chapitre I^er − Prévention des risques d’exposition aux rayonnements ionisants, articles L 4451-1 et suivants. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/section_lc/LEGITEXT000006072050/LEGISCTA000006178087?etatTexte=VIGUEUR&etatTexte=VIGUEUR_DIFF. [Google Scholar]
EC. 2013. Review of current off-site nuclear emergency preparedness and response arrangements in EU member states and neighbouring countries. ENCO FR-(13)-29; EC/ENER/D1/2012-474. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/2014_nep_epr_review_2012-474_main_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
EPA. 2017. PAG manuel: Protective action guides and planning guidance for radiological incidents. EPA-400/R-17/001. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2017-01/documents/epa_pag_manual_final_revisions_01-11-2017_cover_disclaimer_8.pdf. [Google Scholar]
EURATOM. 2016. Règlement 2016/52 fixant les niveaux maximaux admissibles de contamination radioactive pour les denrées alimentaires et les aliments pour animaux après un accident nucléaire ou dans toute autre situation d’urgence radiologique. JOUE, L13/2 du 20/01/2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32016R0052. [Google Scholar]
FAO. 2019. Codex Alimentarius: general standard for contaminants and toxins in food and feed. CXS 193-1995, amended 2019. http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B193-1995%252FCXS_193e.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Gouvernement du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. 2015. Plan d’intervention d’urgence (PIU) en cas d’accident nucléaire. https://www.infocrise.lu/documents/20181/22768/PLAN_URGENCE_NUCLEAIRE_VERSION_PUBLIQUE_LR.pdf/f0a69009-136c-497b-a994-b3b216742ba1. [Google Scholar]
HERCA-WENRA. 2014. HERCA-WENRA approach for a better cross-border coordination of protective actions during the early phase of a nuclear accident. https://www.asn.fr/Media/Files/HERCA-WENRA-approach-for-better-cross-border-coordination-of-protective-actions-during-the-early-phase-of-a-nuclear-accident?. [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2012. Criteria for use in preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. General safety requirements 2 (GSR-2). Vienna: IAEA ed., STI/PUB/1467. [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2014. Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards (GSR part 3). Vienna: IAEA ed., STI/PUB/1578. [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2015. Preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency. General safety requirements 7 (GSR-7). Vienna: IAEA ed., STI/PUB/1708. [Google Scholar]
IAEA. 2018. Arrangements for the termination of a nuclear or radiological emergency. General safety guide 11 (GSG-11). Vienna: IAEA ed., STI/PUB/1796. [Google Scholar]
ICRP. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2-4). [Google Scholar]
ICRP. 2018. Ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection. ICRP publication 138. Ann. ICRP 47(1). [Google Scholar]
ICRP. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Ann. ICRP 49(4). [Google Scholar]
Kuroda Y, Koyama Y, Yoshida H, Naito W. 2020. Preparation of an “Information booklet for returnees” − Building trust through collaboration with local communities. Radioprotection 55(4): 309–315. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020081. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Moniteur Belge. 2018. Plan d’urgence nucléaire et radiologique pour le territoire belge. 6 mars 2018, 18847. https://centredecrise.be/sites/default/files/nucleair_noodplan_belgischstaatsblad_plan_durgence_nucleaire_moniteur_belge_0.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Naito W, Uesaka M, Kuroda Y, Kono T, Sakoda A, Yoshida H. 2020. Examples of practical activities related to public understanding of radiation risk following the Fukushima nuclear accident. Radioprotection 55(4): 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020086. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Nirasawa T, Tsubokura M, Murakami M. 2021. Changes in radiation protection measures after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident: evaluation of meeting minutes of the Nuclear Regulation Authority, Japan. Radioprotection 56(2): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020079. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
NCRP. 2014. Decision making for late-phase recovery from major nuclear or radiological incidents. NCRP report 175. Bethesda, MD: NCRP ed. [Google Scholar]
OFPP. 2015. Concept de protection d’urgence en cas d’accident nucléaire en Suisse. Cote: 403. 2-0. http://www.news.admin.ch/NSBSubscriber/message/attachments/40199.pdf. [Google Scholar]
PHE. 2019. Public health protection in radiation emergencies. Report PHE-CRCE-049. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/805655/Advice_for_Radiation_Emergencies_2019.pdf. [Google Scholar]
Schneider T, Lochard J, Maître M, Ban N, Croüail P, Gallego E, Homma T, Kai M, Lecomte JF, Takamura N. 2021. Radiological protection challenges facing business activities affected by a nuclear accident: some lessons from the management of the accident at the Fukushima-Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Radioprotection 56(3): 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021022. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Skuterud, L, Thørring H. 2012. Averted doses to Norwegian Sámi Reindeer Herders after the Chernobyl accident. Health Phys. 102(2): 208–216. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
SSK. 2014. Basic radiological principles for decisions on measures for the protection of the population against incidents involving releases of radionuclides. Recommendations by the German commission on radiological protection. https://www.ssk.de/SharedDocs/Beratungsergebnisse_PDF/2014/RadiologischeGrundlagen_e.html?nn=2876422. [Google Scholar]
SSK. 2015. Operational intervention levels (OILs) for measures to protect individuals in the event of environmental contamination with alpha and beta emitters. Recommendations by the German Commission on Radiological Protection. https://www.ssk.de/SharedDocs/Beratungsergebnisse_PDF/2015/2015-12-03_Empf_AlphaBeta_e.pdf?__blob=publicationFile. [Google Scholar]
SSK. 2019. Operational intervention levels for measures to protect the population against incidents involving releases of radionuclides. Recommendations by the German Commission on Radiological Protection. https://www.ssk.de/SharedDocs/Beratungsergebnisse_E/2019/2019-10-25_Empf_AbgeleitRichtwerte_e.html;jsessionid=982C93FE65B0C7C84F7A6532B202BE0B.2_cid382. [Google Scholar]
STUK. 2014. Protective measures in early and intermediate phases of a nuclear of radiological accident. https://www.stuk.fi/documents/12547/103518/nordic_flagbook_february2014.pdf/de016067-7c30-4747-bd63-606bdaad08f7. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.