Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 55, May 2020
Coping with uncertainties for improved modelling and decision making in nuclear emergencies. Key results of the CONFIDENCE European research project
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | S127 - S134 | |
Section | DEVELOPMENT OF COUNTERMEASURE STRATEGIES INVOLVING STAKEHOLDERS | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020022 | |
Published online | 08 May 2020 |
Article
Stakeholder involvement through national panels and surveys to address the issues and uncertainties arising in the preparedness and management of the transition phase
1
CIEMAT – Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas,
Madrid, Spain
2
CEPN – Centre d’étude sur l’Évaluation de la Protection dans le domaine Nucléaire,
Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
3
EPA – Environmental Protection Agency,
Dublin, Ireland
4
EEAE – Greek Atomic Energy Commission,
Athens, Greece
5
IRSN – Institute for Radioprotection and Nuclear Safety,
Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France
6
DSA – Norwegian Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority,
Østerås, Norway
7
RIVM – Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu,
Bilthoven, the Netherlands
8
SCK-CEN – Belgian Nuclear Research Centre,
Mol, Belgium
9
VUJE – VUJE a.s,
Trnava, Slovak Republic
10
APA – Agência Portuguesa do Ambiente,
Amadora, Portugal
11
IST-C2TN – Instituto Superior Técnico, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares,
Lisbon, Portugal
12
WFSR – Wageningen Food Safety Research,
Wageningen, the Netherlands
* Corresponding author: milagros.montero@ciemat.es
Under the framework of the CONFIDENCE project, work package 4 was focusing on the transition to long-term recovery, involving stakeholders in decision-making processes. The essential research was performed using a participatory approach, which combined scenario-based stakeholder discussion panels and transnational stakeholder surveys following the Delphi methodology. The objective was to identify and address the issues and uncertainties arising in the preparedness and management of the transition phase and to explore ways to facilitate the incorporation of stakeholders’ expertise, points of view and interests in the decision-making processes. The final goal was to build best practices for planning optimal remediation strategies during the transition phase considering stakeholder involvement in the decision-making process. The results obtained from the work undertaken in nine European countries are presented.
Key words: emergency preparedness / transition phase / recovery / decision-making / stakeholder engagement / Delphi survey / CONFIDENCE
© The Authors, published by EDP Sciences 2020
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.