EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 61 / Numéro 2 (Avril-Juin 2026) Radioprotection, 61 2 (2026) 121-125 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
Page(s) 121 - 125
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025037
Published online 15 juin 2026
  • Aroua A, Rickli H, Stauffer JC, Schnyder P, Trueb PR, Valley JF, Vock P, Verdun FR. 2007. How to set up and apply reference levels in fluoroscopy at a national level. Eur Radiol 17: 1621–1633. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bleeser F, Hoornaert M-T., Smans K, Struelens L, Buls N, Berus D, Clerinx P, Hambach L, Malchair F, Bosmans H. 2008. Diagnostic reference levels in angiography and interventional radiology: a Belgian multi-centre study. Radiat Prot Dosim 129: 50–55. [Google Scholar]
  • Crowhurst JA, Whitby M, Savage M, Murdoch D, Robinson B, Shaw E, Gaikwad N, Saireddy R, Hay K, Walters DL. 2019. Factors contributing to radiation dose for patients and operators during diagnostic cardiac angiography. J Med Radiat Sci 66: 20–29. [Google Scholar]
  • D’Helft CJ, Brennan, Mcgee AM, Mcfadden SL, Hughes CM, Winder JR, Rainford LA; 2009. Potential Irish dose reference levels for cardiac interventional examinations. British J Radiol 82: 296–302. [Google Scholar]
  • Erskine BJ, Brady Z, Marshall EM. 2014. Local diagnostic reference levels for angiographic and fluoroscopic procedures: Australian practice. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 37: 75–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Etard C, Bigand E, Salvat C, Vidal V, Beregi JP, Hornbeck A, Greffier J. 2017. Patient dose in interventional radiology: a multicentre study of the most frequent procedures in France. Eur Radiol 27: 4281–4290. [Google Scholar]
  • European Commission. 1999. Radiation Protection 109: Guidance on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Medical Exposures. Nuclear Safety. Publications Office. [Google Scholar]
  • Ferrari P, Jovanovic Z, Bakhanova E, Becker F, Krstic D, Jansen J, Principi S, Teles P, Clairand I, Knezevic Ž. 2020. Absorbed dose in the operator’s brain in interventional radiology practices: evaluation through KAP value conversion factors. Phys Med 76: 177–181. [Google Scholar]
  • Guenego A, Mosimann PJ, Pereira VM, Nicholson P, Zuber K, Lotterie JA, Dobrocky T, Marcellus DG, Olivot JM, Piotin M, Gralla J, Fahed R, Wintermark M, Heit JJ, Cognard C. 2019. Proposed achievable levels of dose and impact of dose-reduction systems for thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: an international, multicentric, retrospective study in 1096 patients. Eur Radiol 29: 3506–3515. [Google Scholar]
  • Heilmaier C, Zuber N, Berthold C, Kara L, Weishaupt D. 2017. Establishing local diagnostic reference levels in ir procedures with dose management software. J Vasc Interv Radiol 28: 429–441. [Google Scholar]
  • Ihn Y-K., Kim B, Jeong HW, Suh SH, Won YD, Lee Y-J., Kim DJ, Jeon P, Ryu C-W., Suh S, Choi DS, Choi SS, Kim SH, Byun JS, Rho J, Song Y, Jeong WS, Hong N, Baik SH, Park JJ, Lim SM, Kim J-J., Yoon W. 2021. Monitoring radiation doses during diagnostic and therapeutic neurointerventional procedures: multicenter study for establishment of reference levels. Neurointervention 16: 240–251. [Google Scholar]
  • Ou-Saada I, Boujemaa S, Campoleoni M, Brambilla R, Bentayeb F. 2020. Local diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 51: 307–311. [Google Scholar]
  • Rizk C, Farah J, Vanhavere F, Fares G. 2019. National diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology suites in lebanon: a multicenter survey. Radiat Prot Dosim 187: 50–60. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Siiskonen T, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Dabin J, Diklic A, Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Farah J, Fernandez JM, Gallagher A, Hourdakis CJ, Jurkovic S, Järvinen H, Järvinen J, Knežević Ž, Koukorava C, Maccia C, Majer M, Malchair F, Riccardi L, Rizk C, Sanchez R, Sandborg M, Merce MS, Segota D, Sierpowska J, Simantirakis G, Sukupova L, Thrapsanioti Z, Vano E. 2018. Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology. Phys Med 54: 42–48. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Tristram J, Steuwe A, Kröpil F, Thomas C, Rubbert C, Antoch G, Boos J. 2022. Typical doses and typical values for fluoroscopic diagnostic and interventional procedures. J Radiol Prot 42. [Google Scholar]
  • UKHSA. 2022. United Kingdom Health Security Agency, National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs) from 13 October 2022. GovUK 1-18. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/diagnostic-radiology-national-diagnostic-reference-levels-ndrls/ndrl#national-drls-for-computed-tomo. Accessed 19 August 2024. [Google Scholar]
  • Vañó E, Miller DL, Martin CJ, Rehani MM, Kang K, Rosenstein M, Ortiz-López P, Mattsson S, Padovani R, Rogers A. 2017. ICRP publication 135: diagnostic reference levels in medical imaging. Annals ICRP. [Google Scholar]
  • Vano E, Sanchez R, Fernandez JM, Gallego JJ, Verdu JF, De Garay MG, Azpiazu A, Segarra A, Hernandez MT, Canis M, Diaz F, Moreno F, Palmero J. 2009. Patient dose reference levels for interventional radiology: A national approach. Cardio Vasc Interv Radiol 32: 19–24. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.