EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
rechercher
Menu
Accueil Tous les numéros Volume 61 / Numéro 1 (Janvier-Mars 2026) Radioprotection, 61 1 (2026) 62-67 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2026
Page(s) 62 - 67
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025023
Published online 20 mars 2026
  • Abuzaid MM, Tekin HO, Elshami W, Almisned G, Ene A, Zakaly HMH. 2022. Radiation dose assessment in multiple injured patients using whole-body computed tomography. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 15: 100465. [Google Scholar]
  • ARPANSA. 2005. Code of Practice for the Exposure of Humans to Ionizing Radiation for Research Purposes. Radiation Protection Series Publication No. 8. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety AgencyPlace. Published [Google Scholar]
  • Asha S, Curtis KA, Grant N, Taylor C, Lo S, Smart R, Compagnoni K. 2012. Comparison of radiation exposure of trauma patients from diagnostic radiology procedures before and after the introduction of a panscan protocol. Emerg Med Australasia 24: 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner DJ, Elliston CD. 2004. Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232: 735–738. [Google Scholar]
  • Davies RM, Scrimshire AB, Sweetman L, Anderton MJ, Holt EM. 2016. A decision tool for whole-body CT in major trauma that safely reduces unnecessary scanning and associated radiation risks: an initial exploratory analysis. Injury 47: 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  • Elmokadem AH, Ibrahim EA, Gouda WA, Khalek Abdel Razek AA. 2019. Whole-body computed tomography using low-dose biphasic injection protocol with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v: assessment of dose reduction and image quality in trauma patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 43: 870–876. [Google Scholar]
  • Godt JC, Johansen CK, Martinsen ACT, Schulz A, Brogger HM, Jensen K, Stray-Pedersen A, Dormagen JB. 2021. Iterative reconstruction improves image quality and reduces radiation dose in trauma protocols: a human cadaver study. Acta Radiol Open 10: 20584601211055389. [Google Scholar]
  • Gordic S, Alkadhi H, Hodel S, Simmen HP, Brueesch M, Frauenfelder T, Wanner G, Sprengel K. 2015. Whole-body CT-based imaging algorithm for multiple trauma patients: radiation dose and time to diagnosis. Br J Radiol 88: 20140616. [Google Scholar]
  • Harrieder A, Geyer LL, Korner M, Deak Z, Wirth S, Reiser M, Linsenmaier U. 2012. Evaluation of radiation dose in 64-row whole-body CT of multiple injured patients compared to 4-row CT. Rofo 184: 443–449. [Google Scholar]
  • Hijji FY, Schneider AD, Thomas MD, Lyons JG, Bohl DD, Jerele JL, Prayson MJ. 2023. Knowledge of radiation exposure associated with common trauma imaging modalities among orthopaedic surgeons, emergency medicine physicians, and general surgeons in the United States. World J Emerg Med 14: 294–301. [Google Scholar]
  • Huber-Wagner S, Kanz KG, Hanschen M, van Griensven M, Biberthaler P, Lefering R. 2018. Whole-body computed tomography in severely injured patients. Curr Opin Crit Care 24: 55–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Huber-Wagner S, Lefering R, Qvick LM, Korner M, Kay MV, Pfeifer KJ, Reiser M, Mutschler W, Kanz KG, Working Group on Polytrauma of the German Trauma S. 2009. Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: a retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 373: 1455–1461. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2007. The 2007 recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann. ICRP 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • Jiang L, Ma Y, Jiang S, Ye L, Zheng Z, Xu Y, Zhang M. 2014. Comparison of whole-body computed tomography vs selective radiological imaging on outcomes in major trauma patients: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 22: 54. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim S, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP, Toncheva G, Yin FF. 2010. Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence. Am J Roentgenol 194: 186–190. [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C, Kim KP, Bolch WE, Moroz BE, Folio L. 2015. NCICT: a computational solution to estimate organ doses for pediatric and adult patients undergoing CT scans. J Radiol Prot 35: 891–909. [Google Scholar]
  • Moorin RE, Gibson DA, Forsyth RK, Fox R. 2014. Demonstration of the effect of generic anatomical divisions versus clinical protocols on computed tomography dose estimates and risk burden. PLoS One 9: e97691. [Google Scholar]
  • Mulas V, Catalano L, Geatti V, Alinari B, Ragusa F, Golfieri R, Orlandi PE, Imbriani M. 2022. Major trauma with only dynamic criteria: is the routine use of whole-body CT as a first level examination justified? Radiol Med 127: 65–71. [Google Scholar]
  • NRC. (2006). Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BEIR VII Phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11340 [Google Scholar]
  • Purcell LN, Charles A. 2020. Low-dose whole-body computed tomography and radiation exposure in patients with trauma-trust, but verify. JAMA Surg 155: 232. [Google Scholar]
  • Sato T, Saito Y, Saito N, Ooba M. 2017. Multicenter investigation of the effective dose for whole-body CT scanning. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 73: 258–266. [Google Scholar]
  • Sierink JC, Treskes K, Edwards MJ, Beuker BJ, den Hartog D, Hohmann J, Dijkgraaf MG, Luitse JS, Beenen LF, Hollmann MW, Goslings JC, Group R.-S. 2016. Immediate total-body CT scanning versus conventional imaging and selective CT scanning in patients with severe trauma (REACT-2): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 388: 673–683. [Google Scholar]
  • Simma L, Fornaro J, Stahr N, Lehner M, Roos JE, Lima TVM. 2022. Optimising whole body computed tomography doses for paediatric trauma patients: a Swiss retrospective analysis. J Radiol Prot 42. [Google Scholar]
  • Weber L, Hansson M, Geijer M. 2023. Computed tomography with adjusted dose for body mass index may be superior to whole-body radiography especially in elderly patients with multiple myeloma. Acta Radiol 64: 1896–1903. [Google Scholar]
  • Wen JC, Sai V, Straatsma BR, McCannel TA. 2013. Radiation-related cancer risk associated with surveillance imaging for metastasis from choroidal melanoma. JAMA Ophthalmol 131: 56–61. [Google Scholar]
  • Zensen S, Bos D, Opitz M, Haubold J, Forsting M, Guberina N, Wetter A. 2022. Radiation exposure and establishment of diagnostic reference levels of whole-body low-dose CT for the assessment of multiple myeloma with second- and third-generation dual-source CT. Acta Radiol 63: 527–535. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.