Free Access

Table 1

Characteristics of the included original studies.

Author (year) Country Data collection period Study design Sample size (response rate) Survey methods Data items Funding and competing interests
Leitgeb et al. (2005) Austria February 2003 Cross-sectional n = 196 (49%) Self-administered questionnaire (14 items) Risk perception, relevance in practice/frequency of EMF-related consultations, information needs Funding: not provided
Competing interests: not provided
Huss & Röösli (2006) Switzerland May − June 2005 Cross-sectional n = 342 (28.2%) Computer-assisted telephone interviews Risk perception, relevance in practice /frequency of EMF-related consultations, information needs Funding: Federal Office of Public Health
Competing interests: none declared
Berg-Beckhoff et al. (2009) Germany March − May 2008 Cross-sectional Short questionnaire:
n = 456 (49.1%),
Long questionnaire:
n = 435 (23.3%)
Self-administered questionnaire with short version (1 page) and long version (4 pages) Level of knowledge, risk perception, relevance in practice /frequency of EMF-related consultations, information needs Funding: Federal Office for Radiation Protection
Competing interests: none declared
Berg-Beckhoff et al. (2010)              
Kowall et al. (2010)              
Berg-Beckhoff et al. (2014)              
Kowall et al. (2015)              
Lambrozo et al. (2013) France September − October 2010 Cross-sectional n = 600 Self-administered questionnaire (24 items) Level of knowledge, relevance in practice /frequency of EMF-related consultations, information needs Funding: Service des études médicales d’EDF
Competing interests: none declared
Slottje et al. (2017) The Netherlands October 2013 − January 2014 Cross-sectional n = 2398 (29%) Self-administered questionnaire Risk perception, relevance in practice/frequency of EMF-related consultations, information needs Funding: Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMW)
Competing interests: not provided

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.