Open Access
Publication ahead of print
Journal
Radioprotection
Section DECISION MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTIES
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020033
Published online 19 May 2020
  • Bertin J. 1983. Semiology of graphics. University of Wisconsin Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Edwards LD, Nelson ES. 2001. Visualizing data certainty: A case study using graduated circle maps. Cartogr. Perspect. 38: 19–26. [Google Scholar]
  • Evans BJ. 1997. Dynamic display of spatial data-reliability: does it benefit the map user? Comp. Geosci. 24(1): 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Healey CG, Booth KS, Enns JT. 1996. High-speed visual estimation using pre-attentive processing. ACM Trans. Comp. – Human Interact. (TOCHI) 3(2): 107–135. [Google Scholar]
  • Hunter GJ, Goodchild M. 1993. Managing uncertainty in spatial databases: putting theory into practice. URISA J. 5: 55–62. [Google Scholar]
  • Julia C, Etilé F, Hercberg S. 2018. Front-of-pack nutri-score labelling in France: an evidence-based policy. Lancet Public Health 3(4): e164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Leadbetter S, Andronopoulos S, Bedwell P, Geertsema G, Jones A, Korsakissok I, Tomas J, De Vries H. 2018. Guidelines ranking uncertainties for atmospheric dispersion, D9.1.1 Using ensemble meteorological forecasts to represent meteorological uncertainty in dispersion models. CONCERT Deliverable D9.1. Available from https://concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Leitner M, Buttenfield BP. 2000. Guidelines for the display of attribute certainty. Cartogr. Geogr. Inform. Sci. 27(1): 3–14. [Google Scholar]
  • Marignac Y, Hazemann J, Baudé S. 2016. Managing the complexity of societal needs in a nuclear emergency situation: towards further experts’ collaboration for the “enlightened protection” of populations. Radioprotection 51(HS2): S159–S161. [Google Scholar]
  • Pang A, Wittenbrink C, Lodha S. 1997. Approaches to uncertainty visualization. Visual Comp. 13: 370–390. [Google Scholar]
  • Perko T, Martell M. 2019. Study on good practices in implementing the requirements on public information in the event of an emergency, under the Euratom Basic Safety Standards Directive and Nuclear Safety Directive – Final report. Luxembourg, 488 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Perko T, Benighaus L, Tafili V, Oughton DH, Tomkiv Y, Sala R, Germán S, López S, Oltra C, Duranova T, Raskob W, Müller T, Nishizawa M, Wolf HV, Thijssen P, Camps J, Turcanu C, Benighaus C, Moschner J, Renn O. 2019a. Guidelines on tools for communication of uncertainties. CONCERT Deliverable D9.29. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • Perko T, Tafili V, Sala R, Duranova T, Zeleznik N, Tomkiv Y, Hoti F, Turcanu C. 2019b. Report on observational study of emergency exercises: List of uncertainties. CONCERT Deliverable D9.28. Available from https://www.concert-h2020.eu/en/Publications. [Google Scholar]
  • RANET. 2020. IAEA Response and Assistance Network. Available from https://www.iaea.org/services/networks/ranet (Last accessed January 2020). [Google Scholar]
  • Raskob W, Schneider T, Gering F, Charron S, Zheleznyak M, Andronopoulos S, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Camps J. 2016. Editorial. Innovative integrative tools and platforms. Key results of the PREPARE European Project. Radioprotection 51(HS2). [Google Scholar]
  • Schweizer DM, Goodchild MF. 1992. Data quality and choropleth maps: An experiment with the use of color. Proc. GIS/LIS 2: 686–699. [Google Scholar]
  • Thomson J, Hetzler E, MacEachren AM, Gahegan M, Pavel M. 2005. A typology for visualizing uncertainty. Visualiz. Data Anal. 5669. International Society for Optics and Photonics. [Google Scholar]
  • Tufte ER. 2001. The visual display of quantitative information, Vol. 2. Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press. [Google Scholar]
  • Ware C. 2012. Information visualization: Perception for design. Elsevier. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.