Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 61, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 95 - 104 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2025042 | |
| Published online | 15 June 2026 | |
- Abuzaid MM, Elshami W, Tekin HO, Ghonim H, Shawki M, Salama DH. 2020. Computed tomography radiation doses for common computed tomography examinations: A nationwide dose survey in United Arab Emirates. Insights Imaging 11(1): 88–94. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adambounou K, Katassou K, Adigo AMY, Adjenou K, Sonhaye L. 2021. Évaluation dosimétrique des tomodensitométries adultes au Togo. J. Afr. Imag. Méd. 13(1): 36–45. [Google Scholar]
- Bos D, Yu S, Luong J, Philip C, Wang Y, Andrew E, et al. 2022. Diagnostic reference levels and median doses for common clinical indications of CT: Findings from an international registry. Eur. Radiol. 43: 1971–1982. [Google Scholar]
- Camara M, Koné AC, Cisse I, Koné T, Diawara Y, Konaté M, et al. 2021. Profil des examens dans le service de radiologie et d’imagerie médicale de l’Hôpital Mère Enfant Le Luxembourg. Health Sci. Dis. 22(6): 77–80. [Google Scholar]
- Christoph A, Nick R, Reto T, Sebastian S. 2019. Update of national diagnostic reference levels for adult CT in Switzerland and assessment of radiation dose reduction since 2010. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 185(2): 123–129. [Google Scholar]
- Erem G, Ameda F, Otike C, Olwit W, Mubuuke AG, Schandorf C, et al. 2022. Adult computed tomography examinations in Uganda: Towards determining the national diagnostic reference levels. BMC Med. Imaging 22(1): 112–124. [Google Scholar]
- IAEA. 2017. Radioprotection et sûreté radiologique dans les applications médicales des rayonnements ionisants : guide de sûreté particulier. IAEA, Bruxelles. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP Publication 105. 2007. Radiological Protection in Medicine. Ann ICRP 37(6): 1–63. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP Publication 103. 2007. Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Elsevier, Oxford. [Google Scholar]
- IRSN. 2023. Analyse des données relatives à la mise à jour des niveaux de références diagnostiques en radiologie et en médecine nucléaire : bilan 2019–2021. IRSN, Fontenay-aux-Roses. [Google Scholar]
- Jimonet C, Moterier H. 2007. Personne Compétente en radioprotection : principes de radioprotection-réglementation. Paris: EDP Sciences, 362 p. [Google Scholar]
- Kabeer SM, Aliyu SA, Umar FK, et al. 2024. Établissement d’un niveau de référence diagnostique pour l’examen de routine par tomodensitométrie dans l’État de Sokoto, au Nigéria. Radioprotection 59(3): 197–202. [Google Scholar]
- Khajmi H, Mounir A, Tounsi A, Lhouceine O. 2025. Niveaux de référence diagnostiques pour la tomodensitométrie adulte au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Marrakech (Maroc). Radioprotection 60(1): 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Lee KL, Beveridge T, Sanagou M, Thomas P. 2020. Updated Australian diagnostic reference levels for adult CT. J. Med. Radiat. Sci. 67(1): 5–15. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mbozo’o Mvondo S, Onana Y, Mohamadou A, Mbo Amvene J, Neossi Guena M, Ngo Dimbeg A, et al. 2021. Grandeurs dosimétriques en scanner pédiatrique dans deux centres d’imagerie médicale de la ville de Douala. Health Sci. Dis. 22(12): 38–42. [Google Scholar]
- Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. 2008. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine. Radiology 248(1): 254–263. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Muhammad NA, Abdul Karim MK, Abu Hassan H, Kamarudin AM, Hsiu Ding Wong J, Hoong Ng K. 2020. Diagnostic reference level of radiation dose and image quality among paediatric CT examinations in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Diagnostic 10(08): 591. [Google Scholar]
- Ndong B, Djigo MS, Akpo G, Bathily EAL, Diop O, Sanou AR, et al. 2021. Dosimetric evaluation of the scanning activity at the regional hospital of Kaolack (Senegal). OJBIPHY 11(03): 351–358. [Google Scholar]
- Ngaile JE, saki PM, Kazema R. 2006. Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania. J. Radiol. Prot. 26: 213–225. [Google Scholar]
- Rehani MM, Tsapaki V, Vano E, et al. 2011. IAEA survey of radiological imaging trends in Africa: Uptake of safety initiatives and need for improvement. Eur. J. Radiol. 79(3): 348–352. [Google Scholar]
- Samer SAZ, Khalid JK, Samir SY, et al. 2016. Ionizing radiation leakage in radio-diagnostic centers at Gaza Strip hospitals, Palestine. Asian Rev. Environ. Earth Sci. 3: 18–26. [Google Scholar]
- Salamaa DH, Jenia V, Gamal M, Mona S, Ahmad S, Debbie G, Madan M. 2017. Establishing national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for computed tomography in Egypt. Phys. Med. 39: 16–24. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Meeson C, Golding SJ. 2014. Doses from Computed Tomography (CT) Examinations in the UK–2011 Review. Public Health England. [Google Scholar]
- Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, et al. 2012. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA 307(22): 2400–2409. [Google Scholar]
- Tankoano Aïda I, Ouedraogo Pakisba A, Somé Milckisédek J, Bassole W, Ndé Ouedraogo NA, Bicaba D, et al. 2020. Évaluation des doses d’exposition et concordance radio-clinique des examens tomodensitométriques pédiatriques au CHUSS de Bobo-Dioulasso. Health Sci. Dis. 21(9): 39–42. [Google Scholar]
- Togbe CE, Sani M, Noukpo R, et al. 2022. Évaluation des doses patient en tomodensitométrie au Bénin : une étude préliminaire. J. Afr. Imag. Méd. 4(1): 15–22. [Google Scholar]
- UNSCEAR. 2010. Sources and effects of ionizing radiation. United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation 2008 report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. United Nations, New York. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.