EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 60 / No 2 (Avril-Juin 2025) Radioprotection, 60 2 (2025) 134-143 References
Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 60, Number 2, Avril-Juin 2025
Page(s) 134 - 143
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024053
Published online 13 June 2025
  • ACR. 2021. AAPM technical standard for diagnostic medical physics performance monitoring of radiographic equipment Revised 2021 (CSC/BOC) [Google Scholar]
  • Agarwal S, Parashar A, Bajaj NS, Khan I, Ahmad I, Heupler FA Jr, Bunte M, Modi DK, Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR. 2014. Relationship of beam angulation and radiation exposure in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 7 (5): 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.203. Epub 2014 Apr 16. PMID: 24746652. [Google Scholar]
  • Balter S, Brinkman M, Kalra S, Nazif T, Parikh M, Kirtane AJ, et al. 2017. Novel radiation dose reduction fluoroscopic technology facilitates chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventions. 8 (13): e1468–e1474. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-16-00216.PMID:28741573. [Google Scholar]
  • Balter, S. et al. 2010. Fluoroscopically guided interventions procedures: a review of radiation effects on patient’s skin and hair. Radiology 254 (2). [Google Scholar]
  • Crowhurst JA, Whitby M, Thiele D, Halligan T, Westerink A, Crown S, Milne J. 2014. Radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: initial results from the establishment of a multi-centre diagnostic reference level in Queensland public hospitals. J Med Radiat Sci. 61 (3): 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.67. Epub 2014 Aug 4. PMID: 26229649; PMCID: P MC4175852. [Google Scholar]
  • Dawn Abbott J. 2014. Controlling radiation exposure in interventional cardiology. Cardiovasc Interv 7: 425–428. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Korir Geoffrey K., Jeska S. Wambani, Christine A. Yuko-Jowi, Ian K. Korir, Mark Tries, Kidali Mike M.. 2013. Establishing diagnostic reference levels for interventional procedures in Kenya. Radiography. 20 (2): 48–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2013.10.007. [Google Scholar]
  • Georges J.L. et al. 2017. Radiation doses to patients in interventional coronary procedures estimation of updated national reference levels by dose audit. Radiat Prot Dosim 175: 17–25. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 1996. International Basic Safety Standards for Protection Against Ionizing Radiation and the Safety of Radiation Sources. Safety series no. 115. Vienna, Austria: International Atomic Energy Agency. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2009. Establishing Guidance Levels In X Ray Guided Medical Interventional Procedures, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Safety Reports Series No. 59 [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2014. Safety Standards, Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. General Safety Requirements part 3. [Google Scholar]
  • IAEA. 2022. Good practices in interventional procedures, RPOP, IAEA, https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/interventional-procedures/good-practices-in-interventional-fluoroscopy [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2000. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. ICRP Publication 85. Ann ICRP 30 (2). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2012. Annals of the ICRP, ICRP publication 118 ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs − Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2013. Radiological protection in cardiology. ICRP Publication 120. Ann ICRP 42 (1). [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2017. ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging. Ottawa: ICRP. viewed 01 February 2021 [Google Scholar]
  • Januszek R, Siłka W, Sabatowski K, Malinowski KP, Heba G, Surowiec S, Chyrchel M, Rzeszutko Ł, Bryniarski L, Surdacki A, Bartuś K, Bartuś S. 2022. Procedure-related differences and clinical outcomes in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention assisted by optical coherence tomography between new and earlier generation software (Ultreon™ 1.0 Software vs. AptiVue™ Software). J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 9 (7): 218. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd9070218. PMID: 35877580; PMCID: P MC9318712. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Januszek R, Siudak Z, Malinowski KP, Wańha W, Surowiec S, Heba G, Pawlik A, Kameczura T, Wojakowski W, Jaguszewski M, Kołodziej A, Bryniarski L, Bartuś K, Surdacki A, Dobrzycki S, Legutko J, Bartuś S. 2023. Factors determining the frequency of optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound use in patients treated with percutaneous coronary interventions in recent years: Analysis based on a large national registry. Kardiol Pol 81 (10): 969–977. https://doi.org/10.33963/KP.a2023.0151. Epub 2023 Jul 4. PMID: 37401576. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Järvinen J, Sierpowska J, Siiskonen T, Järvinen H, Kiviniemi T, Rissanen TT, Matikka H, Niskanen E, Hurme S, Larjava HRS, Mäkelä TJ, Strengell S, Eskola M, Parviainen T, Hallinen E, Pirinen M, Kivelä A, Teräs M. 2019. Contemporary radiation doses in interventional cardiology: a nationwide study of patient doses in finland. Radiat Prot Dosim 185 (4): 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz041. PMID: 30989216. [Google Scholar]
  • Kataria V, Yaduvanshi I, Singal G, Nair M. 2021. Establishing a diagnostic reference level of radiation dose in coronary angiography and intervention: a prospective evaluation. Indian Heart J 73 (6): 725–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2021.09.012. Epub 2021 Sep 21. PMID: 34861982; PMCID: P MC8642644. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Kidoń J, Kinga P-G., Leszek W. 2022. Local diagnostic reference levels and effective doses: single institution levels for interventional cardiology procedures for adult patients. J Polish Soc Med Phys 28 (2). https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2022-0009 [Google Scholar]
  • Miller DL, et al. 2010. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology society of europe; society of interventional radiology. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional radiology society of Europe and the society of interventional radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21 (5): 607–615. https://doi.,org/10.1016/j.,jvir.2010.01.007. PMID: 20430294. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • NCRP report No 168. 2010. Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically-Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. [Google Scholar]
  • Ordiales JM, Nogales JM, Martinez G, García P, Benedicto A, Castillo MFR, Torres LP, Font J, Bethencourt A, Cesteros MJ, Pérez A, Pinar E, Tobarra B. 2020. Updating national diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology and methodological aspects. Phys Med 70: 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.014. Epub 2020 Feb 5. PMID: 32032801. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Padmanabhan D, Shankar S, Chandrashekharaiah A, Deshpande S. 2019. Strategies to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology and interventional cardiology. US Cardiol Rev 13 (2): 117–122. https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2019.21.2 [Google Scholar]
  • Padovani R, Bernardi G, Malisan MR, et al. 2001. Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures. Radiat Prot Dosim 94: 189–92. PubMed. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ramanathan V, Senarathna HS, Gunaratna HU, Bandara PM, Horadigala CJ. 2023. Establishment of institutional diagnostic reference level for coronary angiography procedures in Sri Lanka. Radiat Prot Dosim 199 (19): 2311–2317. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncad238. PMID: 37624229. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Rizk C, Farah J, Vanhavere F, Fares G. 2019. National diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology suites in lebanon: a multicenter survey. Radiat Prot Dosim 187 (1): 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncz137. Advance Access publication 21 May 2019. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ruiz-Cruces R. et al. 2016. Diagnostic reference levels and complexity indices in interventional radiology: a national programme. Eur Radiol 26: 4268–4276. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ryckx N, Goy J, Stauffer J, Verdun FR. 2016. Patient dose assessment after interventional cardiology procedures: a multi-centric approach to trigger optimization. Radiat Prot Dosim 169: 249–252. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Sánchez R, Vañó E, et al. 2020. Updating national diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology and methodological aspects, Phys Med 70: 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.01.014. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ, Brix G. 2019. Diagnostic reference levels for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures in Germany: update and handling. Rofo. 191 (8): 739–751. English, German. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0824-7603. Epub 2019 Jan 21. PMID: 30665250. [Google Scholar]
  • Siiskonen T, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Dabin J, Diklic A, Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Farah J, Fernandez JM, Gallagher A, Hourdakis CJ, Jurkovic S, Järvinen H, Järvinen J, Knežević Ž, Koukorava C, Maccia C, Majer M, Malchair F, Riccardi L, Rizk C, Sanchez R, Sandborg M, Merce MS, Segota D, Sierpowska J, Simantirakis G, Sukupova L, Thrapsanioti Z, Vano E. 2018. Establishing the European diagnostic reference levels for interventional cardiology. Phys Med 54: 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 27. PMID: 30337009. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Slave O, Mahomed N. 2023. An audit of patient radiation doses in interventional radiology at a South African hospital. S Afr J Rad 27 (1): a2559. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2559. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Srimahachota S, Trinavarat P, Sukwijit K, Sudchai W, Kaewta K, Chamnan M, Pitaksuteepong T, Na Nan R, Sae-oui A, Torpongpun A, Namkoch N, Kupharangchotsin M, Thungsuk S, Krisanachinda A. 2022. National diagnostic reference levels of procedures in cardiac catheterization laboratory in thailand: a multi centers survey. J Med Assoc Thai 105 (9): 784–789. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tsapaki V, Ahmed NA, AlSuwaidi JS, Beganovic A, Benider A, BenOmrane L, Borisova R, Economides S, El-Nachef L, Faj D, Hovhannesyan A, Kharita MH, Khelassi-Toutaoui N, Manatrakul N, Mirsaidov I, Shaaban M, Ursulean I, Wambani JS, Zaman A, Ziliukas J, Zontar D, Rehani MM. 2009. Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193 (2): 559–569. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.08.2115. PMID: 19620457. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2010. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. Volume I: Sources: Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annexes A and B. UNSCEAR 2008 Report. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. United Nations sales publication E.10.XI.3. United Nations, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2022. Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Volume I: Sources: Report to the General Assembly, Scientific Annexes A. UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. United Nations sales publication E.22.IX.1. United Nations, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Valentin J. 2000. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 30: 7–67. Crossref, Medline. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.