Open Access
| Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 59, Number 4, October - December 2024
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Page(s) | 261 - 269 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024029 | |
| Published online | 13 December 2024 | |
- Ando R, Koyama Y, Kobayashi T., Sasaki D, Akimoto N, Schneider T, Lochard J, Yumiko Kanai F Y. 2023. Report on the 24th Fukushima Dialogue “Creating the Future of Fukushima Together With The Next Generation”. Radioprotection, Vol 3, pp 5–10. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Baudé S, Heriard-Dubreuil G, Eikelmann I-M., Boilley D, Schneider T. 2016. Local populations facing long-term consequences of nuclear accidents: lessons learnt from Chernobyl and Fukushima. Radioprotection 51: S155–S158. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Bogdevitch I. 2003. Remediation strategy and practice on agricultural land contaminated with 137 Cs and 90 Sr in Belarus. 25–26 November 2003, Environment and Radiation Protection. Seminar 4, pp. 83–92, Paris: Eurosafe. [Google Scholar]
- Bragin Historical Museum. 2023. Available at: http://bragin.museum.by/en (last access: 4 September 2023) [Google Scholar]
- Hande V, Orita M, Matsunaga H, Kashiwazaki Y, Xiao X, Taira Y, Takamura N. 2023. Importance of improving radiation risk perception during reconstruction of Futaba town at 11 years after lifting of Fukushima nuclear accident evacuation orders. Radioprotection 58 (4): 261–269. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Hériard Dubreuil G, Lochard J, Girard P, et al. 1999. Chernobyl post-accident management: the ETHOS project. Health Phys. 77: 361–372. [Google Scholar]
- ICRP. 2020. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146. Ann ICRP 49 (4). [Google Scholar]
- Igarashi Y. 2022. The Round-Table project in Kashiwa: a dialogue to reconcile consumers and farmers in the Tokyo suburbs after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 2022, 57 (3): 209–215. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Ito S, Okabe S, Goto A. 2023. Attitudes toward future motherhood among female college students in Fukushima Prefecture at seven years after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Radioprotection 58 (4): 271–279. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Kai M, Homma T, Lochard J, Schneider T, Lecomte JF, Nisbet A, Shinkarev S, Averin V, Lazo T. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident: update of ICRP Publications 109 and 111. ICRP Publication 146.Ann. ICRP 49 (4). NPO Fukushima Dialogue. [Google Scholar]
- Lepicard S, Hériard Dubreuil G. 2001. Practical improvement of the radiological qual- ity of milk produced by peasant farmers in the territories of Belarus contaminated by the Chernobyl accident − the ETHOS project. J Environ Radioact 56: 241–253. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lochard J. 2013. Stakeholder engagement in regaining decent living conditions after chernobyl. In: Social and Ethical Aspects of Radiation Risk Management (D. Oughton, S.O. Hansson Eds.). pp. 311–332. Elsevier Science. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lochard J, Ando R, Takagi H, et al. 2020. The post-nuclear accident co-expertise experience of the Suetsugi community in Fukushima Prefecture. Radioprotection 55 (3): 225–235. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- NPO Fukushima Dialogue. 2023. Available at https://fukushima-dialogue.jp/en/. Last access: 04 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Ozaki S, Koenuma N. 2024. Male-Dominated Recovery Leaves Women Behind: Gender Equality Far Off in Nuclear Disaster Areas. Mainichi Newspaper, March 6, 2024. https://mainichi.jp/articles/20240304/k00/00m/040/333000c. (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
- Reich Mi R, Goto A. 2015. Towards long-term responses in Fukushima. Lancet 386 (9992): 498–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61030-3 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saito M. 2023. On the reality of population changes during the reconstruction period following the nuclear accident: focusing on two towns where evacuation orders were lifted in advance. Reports of the CPIJ, 22 (2): 306–311. https://doi.org/10.11361/reportscpij.22.2_306 (in Japanese) [Google Scholar]
- Takamura N, Orita M, Taira Y, et al. 2018. Recovery from nuclear disaster in Fukushima: collaboration model. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 182: 49–52. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trafimchick Z. 2005. The CORE Programme in Belarus: a New Approach to the Rehabilitation of Living Conditions in Contaminated Areas. Chernobyl Forum, Vienna. Radiological protection of people and the environment in the event of a large nuclear accident. Available at: https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/37/009/37009800.pdf (last accessed 3 September 2020). [Google Scholar]
- UNDP-UNICEF. 2002. The human consequences of the Chernobyl nuclear accident: A strategy for recovery. UNDP. [Google Scholar]
- Yasutaka T, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, et al. 2020. Dialogue, radiation measurements and other collaborative practices by experts and residents in the former evacuation areas of Fukushima: a case study in Yamakiya District, Kawamata Town. Radioprotection 55 (3): 215–224. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.