Open Access
Issue |
Radioprotection
Volume 59, Number 3, July - September
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 220 - 224 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2024019 | |
Published online | 18 September 2024 |
- Adliene D, Griciene B, Skovorodko K, Laurikaitiene J, Puiso J, et al. 2020. Occupational radiation exposure of health professionals and cancer risk assessment for Lithuanian nuclear medicine workers. Environ Res 183: 109144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109144 [Google Scholar]
- Al-Haj AN, Lobriguito AM, Al-Gain I, et al. 2015. Taff eye doses in a large medical centre in Saudi Arabia: Are they meeting the new ICRP recommendations? Radiat Prot Dosimetry 165: 294–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv073 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Antic V, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Stankovic J, Arandjic D, Todorovic N, Lucic S, et al. 2014. Radiation exposure to nuclear medicine staff involved in PET/CT practice in Serbia. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 162: 577–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu001 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bernier MO, Journy N, Villoing D, Doody MM, Alexander BH, Linet MS, et al. 2018. Cataract risk in a cohort of U.S. radiologic technologists performing nuclear medicine procedures. Radiology 286 (2): 592–601. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017170683 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bilski P, Bordy J-M., Daures J, Denoziere M, Fantuzzi E, Ferrari P, et al. 2011. The new EYE-D dosemeter for measurements of HP(3) for medical staff. Radiat Meas 46: 1239–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.04.031 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Covens P, Berus D, Buls N, Clerinx P, Vanhavere F, et al. 2007. Personal dose monitoring in hospitals: Global assessment, critical applications and future needs. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 124: 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncm418 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demeter S, Goertzen AL, Patterson J, et al. 2019. Demonstrating compliance with proposed reduced lens of eye dose limits in nuclear medicine settings. Health Phys 117: 313–338. https://doi., org/10.1097/HP. 0000000000001059 [Google Scholar]
- Fish D, Kim A, Ornelas C, Song S, Pangarkar S. 2011. The risk of radiation exposure to the eyes of the interventional pain physician. Radiol Res Pract 2011: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/609537 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ICRP publication 118. 2012. Tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs − threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001 [Google Scholar]
- Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M, et al. 2008. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248: 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2481071451 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Principi S, Delgado Soler C, Ginjaume M, Beltran Vilagrasa M, Rovira Escutia JJ, Duch MA, et al. 2015. Eye lens dose in interventional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 165: 289–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv051 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seierstad T, Stranden E, Bjering K, Evensen M, Holt A, Michalsen HM, et al. 2007. Doses to nuclear technicians in a dedicated PET/CT centre utilising 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 123: 246–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncl141 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Summers EC, Brown JLE, Bownes PJ, Anderson SE, et al. 2012. Eye doses to staff in a nuclear medicine department. Nucl Med Commun 33: 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0b013e3283510a8f [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thome C, Chambers DB, Hooker AM, Thompson JW, Boreham DR, et al. 2018. Deterministic effects to the lens of the eye following ionizing radiation exposure: is there evidence to support a reduction in threshold dose? Health Phys 114: 328–343. https://doi., org/10.1097/HP. 0000000000000810 [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.