Development of radiation education in schools after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident ― a study from the perspectives of regionality, multidisciplinarity and continuity

Open Access

Issue		Radioprotection Volume 55, Number 4, October-December 2020


Page(s)		317 - 324
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2020078
Published online		20 January 2021

Adachi N, et al. 2016. Measurement and comparison of individual external doses of high-school students living in Japan, France, Poland and Belarus-the ’D-shuttle’ project. J. Radiol. Prot. 36(1): 49–66. doi:10.1088/0952-4746/36/1/49. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Bekki M., Morikawa N, Tsukada S, Akishige Y. 2013. Investigation of a teacher’s consciousness to radiation education and a teaching material. Bull. Cent. Support. Educ. Shimane Univ. 12: 43–51. [Google Scholar]
Bertho JM, Maître M, Croüail P, Naito W, Shkliarava N, Mostovenko A, Jones K, Cornu MS (2019). Assessment of population radiation exposure at the edge of the exclusion zone 32 years after the Chernobyl accident: methods and preliminary results. Radioprotection 54(4): 247–257. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
Bromet EJ. 2014. Emotional consequences of nuclear power plant disasters. Health Phys. 106(2): 206–210. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000012. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Chiba A. 2019. Classes relating to Fukushima reconstruction and radiation physics education. J. Phys. Educ. Soc. Jpn. 67(4): 235–240. [Google Scholar]
DeWalt DA, Broucksou KA, Hawk V, Brach C, Hink A, Rudd R, Callahan L. 2011. Developing and testing the health literacy universal precautions toolkit. Nurs. Outlook. 59(2): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Gilmour S, Miyagawa S, Kasuga F, Shibuya K. 2016. Current measures on radioactive contamination in Japan: A policy situation analysis. PLoS One 11(3): e0152040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0152040. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Goto A, Lai AY, Kumagai A, Koizumi S, Yoshida K, Yamawaki K, Rudd RE. 2018. Collaborative processes of developing a health literacy toolkit: a case from Fukushima after the nuclear accident. J. Health Commun. 23(2): 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1423650. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Goodman L. 1961 Snowball sampling. Ann. Math. Stat. 32(1): 148–170. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
Hosaka M, Fujita K. 2012. The current situation and issues of radiation learning in junior high school science classes . An educational research report by the Faculty of Education and Human Studies, Akita University. 34: 25–34. [Google Scholar]
Konishi E, Nagai T, Kobayashi M, Mitsumori Y, Ono W, Asahara K, Porter SE. 2016. Post-Fukushima radiation education for public health nursing students: a case study. Int. Nurs. Rev. 63(2): 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12244. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Kuroda Y. 2017. Public health activities contributing to recovery of life after nuclear emergency: lessons from working with Iitate people. J. Public Heal. Pract. 81: 328–334. [Google Scholar]
Kuroda Y, Iwasa H, Orui M, Moriyama N, Nakayama C, Yasumura S. 2018. Association between health literacy and radiation anxiety among residents after a nuclear accident: comparison between evacuated and non-evacuated areas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(7): 1463. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071463. [Google Scholar]
Maeda M, Oe M. 2017. Mental health consequences and social issues after the Fukushima Disaster. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 29(2_Suppl.): 36S–46S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516689695. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mashiko H, Yabe H, Maeda M, Itagaki S, Kunii Y, Shiga T, Miura I, Suzuki Y, Yasumura S, Iwasa H, Niwa SI, Ohtsuru A, Abe M. 2017. Mental health status of children after the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 29: 131S–138S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516675702. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Mayring P. 2000. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 1(2). Retrieved March 10, 2005 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/02-00mayring-e.htm. [Google Scholar]
Murakami M, Sato A, Matsui S, Goto A, Kumagai A, Tsubokura M, Orita M, Takamura N, Kuroda Y, Ochi S. 2017. Communicating with residents about risks following the Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 29(2_Suppl.): 74S–89S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516681841. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Nukui H, Midorikawa S, Murakami M, Maeda M, Ohtsuru A. 2018. Mental health of nurses after the Fukushima complex disaster: a narrative review. J. Radiat. Res. 59(Suppl._2): ii108–ii113. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry023. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Oe M, Schumacher S, Schnyder U, Mueller-Pfeiffer C, Wilhelm FH, Kuelen E, Martin-Soelch C. 2016. Discriminative evaluative conditioning in the long-term after severe accidental injury. Psychiatry Res. 240: 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.022. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Oe M, Takahashi H, Maeda M, Harigane M, Fujii S, Miura I, Nagai M, Yabe H, Ohira T, Suzuki Y, Yasumura S, Abe M. 2017. Changes of posttraumatic stress responses in evacuated residents and their related factors. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 29(2_Suppl.): 182S–192S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516680733. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ohno K, Kaori T. 2011. Effective education in radiation safety for nurses. Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry 147(1–2): 343–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncr342. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Ohto H, Yasumura S, Maeda M, Kainuma H, Fujimori K, Nollet KE. 2017. From devastation to recovery and revival in the aftermath of Fukushima’s nuclear power plants accident. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 29(2_Suppl.): 10S–17S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516675700. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Okada T. 2014. The diversity of radiation education programs at primary schools in Fukushima Prefecture Fukushima Prefecture. Bull. Cent. Res. Dev. Educ. Fukushima Univ. 17: 59–66. [Google Scholar]
Orita M, et al. 2015. Bipolarization of risk perception about the health effects of radiation in residents after the accident at Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. PLoS One 10(6): e0129227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129227. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Suzuki Y, Yabe H, Yasumura S, Ohira T, Niwa SI, Ohtsuru A, Mashiko H, Maeda M, Abe M. 2015. Psychological distress and the perception of radiation risks: the Fukushima health management survey. Bull. World Health Organ. 93(9): 598–605. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.14.146498. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tsubokura M, Kitamura Y, Yoshida M. 2018. Post-Fukushima radiation education for Japanese high school students in affected areas and its positive effects on their radiation literacy. J. Radiat. Res. 59: ii65–ii74. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rry010. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Tsujiuchi T, et al. 2016. High prevalence of post-traumatic stress symptoms in relation to social factors in affected population one year after the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster. PLoS One 11(3): e0151807. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151807. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Yamaguchi K. 2019. Diversified activity for radiation education in Fukushima Prefecture. J. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Educ. 42: 159–160. [Google Scholar]
Yasui K, Kimura Y, Kamiya K, Miyatani R, Tsuyama N, Sakai A, Yoshida K, Yamashita S, Chhem R, Abdel-Wahab M, Ohtsuru A. 2017. Academic responses to Fukushima disaster. Asia Pac. J. Public Health. 29(2_Suppl.): 99S–109S. https://doi.org/10.1177/1010539516685400. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Yoshida M, Honda E. 2018. Current status and history of radiation education; considering the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear disaster. Ochanomizu igaku zasshi. 66(2): 227–245. [Google Scholar]
Yoshida N, Kanda J. 2012. T racking the Fukushima radionuclides. Science 336(6085): 1115–1116. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.12194. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.