Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 54, Number 4, October-December 2019
Page(s) 247 - 257
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2019041
Published online 23 December 2019
  • Adachi N et al. 2016. Measurement and comparison of individual external doses of high-school students living in Japan, France, Poland and Belarus – the “D-shuttle” project. J. Radiol. Prot. 36: 49–66. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ando R. 2018. Trust-what connects science to daily life. Health Phys. 115: 581–589. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bataille C, Croüail P. 2005. Analyse des dispositifs réglementaires concernant le contrôle et le suivi de la contamination des sols, des denrées alimentaires et des produits commerciaux en Biélorussie. Fontenay aux roses : CEPN, p. 54 (in French). [Google Scholar]
  • Bernhardsson C, Zvonova I, Raaf C, Mattsson S. 2011. Measurements of long-term external and internal radiation exposure of inhabitants of some villages of the Bryansk region of Russia after the Chernobyl accident. Sci. Total Environ. 409: 4811–4817. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Bottollier-Depois JF, Allain E, Baumont G, Berthelod N, Clairand I, Couvez C, Darley G, Henry B, Jolivet T, Laroche P, Lebeau-Live A, Lejeune V, Miss J, Monange W, Quéinnec F, Richet Y, Simon C, Trompier F, Vayron F. 2017. OPEN RADIATION: A collaborative project for radioactivity measurement in the environment by the public. Eur. Phys. J. Conf. 153: 08002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bottollier-Depois JF, Allain E, Baumont G, Berthelot N, Darley G, Ecrabet F, Jolivet T, Lebeau-Livé A, Lejeune V, Queinnec F, Simon C, Trompier F. 2019. The OpenRadiation project: Monitoring environmental radioactivity by and for the citizens. Radioprotection 54(4): 241–246 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Brown A, Franken P, Bonner S, Dolezal N, Moross J. 2016. Safecast: Successful citizen-science for radiation measurement and communication after Fukushima. J. Radiol. Prot. 36: S82–S101. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Dubreuil GH, Lochard J, Girard P, Guyonnet JF, Le Cardinal G, Lepicard S, Livolsi P, Monroy M, Ollagnon H, Pena-Vega A, Pupin V, Rigby J, Rolevitch I, Schneider T. 1999. Chernobyl post-accident management: The ETHOS project. Health Phys. 77: 361–72. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hirayama H. 2013. An evaluation of personal dosimeter for widely distributed 134Cs and 137Cs by using EGS code. Radioisotopes 62: 335–345. [Google Scholar]
  • Hultquist C, Cervone G. 2018. Citizen monitoring during hazards: Validation of Fukushima radiation measurements. GeoJournal 83: 189–206. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2009. Application of the commission’s recommendations to the protection of people living in long-term contaminated areas after a nuclear accident or a radiation emergency. ICRP Publication 111. Ann ICRP 39: 74. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP. 2018. Ethical foundations of the system of radiological protection. ICRP Publication 138. Ann ICRP 47: 1–65. [Google Scholar]
  • IRSN. 2016. Exposition de la population française aux rayonnements ionisants. Fontenay-aux-Roses : IRSN, p. 23 (in French). [Google Scholar]
  • Liland A, Skuterud L. 2013. Social and ethical aspects of radiation risk management (D. Oughton, S.O. Hansson, Eds.) pp. 159–176. Amsterdam: Elsevier. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lochard J. 2007. Rehabilitation of living conditions in territories contaminated by the Chernobyl accident: The ETHOS project. Health Phys. 93: 522–526. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lochard J, Schneider T, Ando R, Niwa O, Clement C, Lecomte JF, Tada JI. 2019. An overview of the dialogue meetings initiated by ICRP in Japan after the Fukushima accident. Radioprotection 54(2), 87–101. DOI: 10.1051/radiopro/2019021. [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Miyazaki M. 2017. Using and explaining individual dosimetry data: Case Study of four municipalities in Fukushima. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 29: 110S–119S. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nursal WI, Okuda T, Toshihiro Y. 2016. Potential of crowdsourcing approach on monitoring radioactivity in Fukushima prefecture. Glob. Environ. Res. 20: 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  • Reiher C. 2016. Lay people and experts in citizen science: Monitoring radioactively contaminated food in post-Fukushima Japan. Asien 140: 56–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Schneider T, Maître M, Lochard J, Charron S, Lecomte J F, Ando R, Kanai Y, Kurihara M, Kuroda Y, Miyazaki M, Naito W, Orita M, Takamura N, Tanigawa K, Tsubokura M, Yasutaka T. 2019. The role of radiological protection experts in stakeholder involvement in the recovery phase of post nuclear accident situations: Some lessons from the Fukushima-Daïchi NPP accident. Radioprotection 54(4): 259–270 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2008. Annex B: Exposures of the public and workers from various sources of radiation. In: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (UNSCEAR, Ed.). New-York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR. 2011. Annex D: Health effects due to radiation from the Chernobyl accident. In: Sources and effects of ionizing radiation (UNSCEAR, Ed.). New-York: United Nations. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.