Open Access
Issue
Radioprotection
Volume 49, Number 1, Janvier-Mars 2014
Page(s) 9 - 15
Section Articles
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2013072
Published online 06 November 2013
  • Arch M.E., Frush D.P. (2008) Pediatric body MDCT: a 5-Year follow-up survey of scanning parameters used by pediatric radiologists, Am. J. Roentgenol. 191, 611-617. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Axelsson B., Persliden J., Schuwert P. (1996) Dosimetry for computed tomography examination of children, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 64, 221-226. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • BEIR VII Phase 2 (2005) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation, The national academies press, 1-423. [Google Scholar]
  • Bernier M.O. et al. (2012) Radiation exposure from CT in early childhood: a French large-scale multicentre study, Brit. J. Radiol. 85, 53-60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Boone J.M., Geraghty E.M., Seibert J.A., Wootton-Gorges S.L. (2003) Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach, Radiology 228, 352-360. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brasch R.C., Boyd D.P., Gooding C.A. (1978) Computer tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners, Am. J. Roentgenol. 131, 95-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brasch R.C., Cann C.E. (1982) Computer tomographic scanning in children: II an updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners, Am. J. Roentgenol. 138, 127-133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D.J. (2002) Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitative, Pediatr. Radiol. 32, 228-231. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D.J. (2010) Slowing the increase in the population dose resulting from CT scans, Radiat. Meas. 174, 809-815. [Google Scholar]
  • Brenner D.J., Elliston C.D., Hall E.J., Berdon W.E. (2001) Estimated risks of radiation- induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT, Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 289-296. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brody A.S., Frush D.P., Huda W., Brent R.L. (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomography, Pediatrics 120, 677-682. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Caon M., Bibbo G., Pattison J. (2000) Monte Carlo calculated effective dose to teenage girls from computed tomography examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 445-448. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Chan C., Wong Y., Chau L., Yu S., Lau P. (1999) Radiation dose reduction in pediatric cranial CT, Pediatr. Radiol. 29, 770-775. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Cody D.D., Moxley D.M., Krugh K.T., O’Daniel J.C., Wagner L.K., Eftekhari F. (2004) Strategies for formulating appropriate MDCT techniques when imaging the chest, abdomen, and pelvis in pediatric patients, Am. J. Roentgenol. 182, 849-859. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Colang J.E., Killion J.B., Vano E. (2007) Patient dose from CT: a literature review, Radiologic Technology 79, 17-26. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Coursey C., Frush D.P., Yoshizumi T., Toncheva G., Nguyen G., Greenberg S.B. (2008) Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding, Am. J. Roentgenol. 190, 54-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donadieu J., Roudier C., Saguintaah M., Maccia C., Chiron R (2007) Estimation of the radiation dose from thoracic CT scans in a cystic fibrosis population, CHEST 132, 1233-1238. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Donnelly L.F., Frush D.P., Nelson R.C. (2000) Multislice helical CT to facilitate combined CT of the neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis in children, Am. J. Roentgenol. 174, 1620-1622. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Donnelly L.F. et al. (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children’s hospital, Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 303-306. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fahey F.H. (2009) Dosimetry of Pediatric PET/CT, J. Nucl. Med. 50, 1483-1491. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fearon T., Vucich J. (1987) Normalized pediatric organ - absorbed doses from CT examinations, Am. J. Roentgenol. 148, 171-174. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fricke B.L. et al. (2003) In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data, Am. J. Roentgenol. 180, 407-411. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Friedland G.W., Thurber B.D. (1996) The birth of CT, Am. J. Roentgenol. 167, 1365-1370. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frush D.P., Donnelly L.F. (1998) Helical CT in children: technical consideration and body applications, Radiology 209, 37-48. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Frush D.P. et al. (2002) Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients, Am. J. Roentgenol. 179, 1107-1113. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frush D.P., Donnelly L.F., Rosen N.S. (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know, Pediatrics 112, 951-957. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Fujii K., Aoyama T., Koyama S., Kawaura C. (2007) Comparative evaluation of organ and effective doses for pediatric patients with those for adults in chest and abdominal CT examinations, Brit. J. Radiol. 80, 657-667. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Fujii K. et al. (2011) Evaluation of organ doses in CT examinations with an infant anthropomorphic phantom, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 147, 151-155. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Galanski M., Nagel H.D., Stamm G. (2006) Pediatric CT exposure practice in the federal republic of Germany, http://www.mh-hannover.de/fileadmin/kliniken/ diagnostische_ radiologie/ download/Report_German_ Paed-CTSurvey_2005_06.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • Gbelcova L., Nikodemova D., Horvathova M. (2011) Dose reduction using bismuth shielding during pediatric CT examinations in Slovakia, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 147, 160-163. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Gu J., Bednarz B., Caracappa P.F., Xu X.G. (2009) The development, validation and application of a multi-detector CT (MDCT) scanner model for assessing organ doses to the pregnant patient and the fetus using Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Med. Biol. 54, 2699-2717. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Hollingsworth C., Frush D.P., Cross M., Lucaya J. (2003) Helical CT of the body: a survey of techniques used for pediatric patients, Am. J. Roentgenol. 180, 401-406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W., Atherton J.V., Ware D.E., Cumming W.A. (1997) An approach for the estimation of effective radiation dose at CT in pediatric patients, Radiology 203, 417-422. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W., Scalzetti E.M., Roskopf M. (2000) Effective doses to patients undergoing thoracic computed tomography examinations, Med. Phys. 27, 838-844. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W., Chamberlain C.C., Rosenbaum A.E. (2001) Radiation doses to infants and adults undergoing head CT examinations, Med. Phys. 28, 393-399. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Huda W., Vance A. (2007) Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT, Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 540-546. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Iakovou I., Karavida N., Kotzassarlidou M. (2008) The computerized tomography scans and their dosimetric safety, Hell. J. Nucl. Med. 11, 82-85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 60 (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon, 1-204. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 87 (2000) Managing patient dose in computed tomography, Pergamon, 1-45. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 102 (2007a) Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), Pergamon, 1-79. [Google Scholar]
  • ICRP Publication 103 (2007b) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon, 1-328. [Google Scholar]
  • Karabulut N., Ariyürek M. (2006) Low dose CT: practices and strategies of radiologists in university hospitals, Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 12, 3-8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Khursheed A., Hillier M.C., Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F. (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations, Brit. J. Radiol. 75, 819-830. [Google Scholar]
  • Kim S., Yoshizumi T.T., Frush D.P., Toncheva G., Yin F. (2010) Radiation dose from cone beam CT in a pediatric phantom: risk estimation of cancer incidence, Am. J. Roentgenol. 194, 186-190. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kim K.P. et al. (2012) Development of a database of organ doses for pediatric and young adult CT scans in the United Kingdom, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 150, 415-426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C. et al. (2007) Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination, Med. Phys. 34, 1858-1873. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C. et al. (2011) Organ doses for reference adult male and female undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulations, Med. Phys. 38, 1196-1206. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lee C., Kim K.P., Long D.J., Bolch W.E. (2012) Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation, Med. Phys. 39, 2129-2146. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Li X., Samei E., DeLong D.M., Jones R.P, Colsher J.G., Frush D.P. (2008) Towards assessing the diagnostic influence of dose reduction in pediatric CT: a study based on simulated lung nodules. In: Proceedings of SPIE conference on the physics of medical imaging, February 16-21, SanDiego, conf. 6913, 6913L16913L12. [Google Scholar]
  • Li X. et al. (2011) Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: Part I. Development and validation of a Monte Carlo program, Med. Phys. 38, 397-407. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Liu A., Williams L.E., Raubitschek A.A. (1996) A CT assisted method for absolute quantitation of internal radioactivity, Med. Phys. 23, 1919-1928. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Lucaya J., Piqueras J., García-Peña P., Enríquez G., García-Macías M., Sotil J. (2000) Low-dose high-resolution CT of the chest in children and young adults: dose, cooperation, artifact incidence, and image quality, Am. J. Roentgenol. 175, 985-992. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mazonakis M., Tzedakis A., Damilakis J., Gourtsoyiannis N. (2007) Thyroid dose from common head and neck CT examinations in children: is there an excess risk for thyroid cancer induction? Eur. Radiol. 17, 1352-1357. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • McLean D., Malitz N., Lewis S. (2003), Survey of effective dose levels from typical pediatric CT protocols, Australasian Radiology 47, 135-142. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Medicine health (2012) http://www.emedicinehealth.com/ct_scan/article_em.htm. [Google Scholar]
  • Mettler F.A. Jr, Wiest P.W., Locken J.A., Kelsey C.A. (2000) CT scanning: patterns of use and dose, J. Radiol. Prot. 20, 353-359. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Moss M., McLean D. (2006) Pediatric and adult computed tomography practice and patient dose in Australia, Australasian Radiology 50, 33-40. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Muhogora W.E. et al. (2010) Pediatric CT examinations in 19 developing countries: frequency and radiation dose, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 140, 49-58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mukundan S. Jr,Wang P.I., Frush D.P., Yoshizumi T., Marcus J., Kloeblen E., Moore M. (2007) MOSFET dosimetry for radiation dose assessment of bismuth shielding of the eye in children, Am. J. Roentgenol. 188, 1648-1650. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nakayama Y. et al. (2005) Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise, Radiology 237, 945-951. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Nickoloff E.L., Alderson P.O. (2001) Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy, Am. J. Roentgenol. 177, 285-287. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Nishizawa K. et al. (2008) Patient dose estimation for multi-detector-row CT examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 128, 98-105. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Pages J., Buls N., Osteaux M. (2003) CT doses in children: a multicentre study, Brit. J. Radiol. 76, 803-811. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Papadimitriou D., Louizi A., Makri T., Theodoropoulos B., Proukakis C. (2000) Computed tomography dosimetry in children, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 417-422. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson A., Frush D.P., Donnelly L.F. (2001) Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients? Am. J. Roentgenol. 176, 297-301. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Paterson A., Frush D.P. (2007) Dose reduction in pediatric MDCT: general principles, Clin. Radiol. 62, 507-517. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Pearce M.S. et al. (2012) Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study, LANCET 380, 499-505. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Reid J., Gamberoni J., Dong F., Davros W. (2010) Optimization of kVp and mAs for pediatric low-dose simulated abdominal CT: is it best to base parameter selection on object circumference? Am. J. Roentgenol. 195, 1015-1020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rybka K., Staniszewska M.A., Biegañski T. (2007) Low-dose protocol for head CT in monitoring hydrocephalus in children, Med. Sci. Monit. 13, 147-151. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Shrimpton P.C., Wall B.F. (2000) Reference doses for pediatric computed tomography, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 90, 249-252. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shrimpton P.C., Hillier M.C., Lewis M.A., Dunn M. (2006) National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003, Brit. J. Radiol. 79, 968-980. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Siegel M.J. (2003) Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi–detector row CT of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population, Radiology 229, 641-650. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Siegel M.J., Schmidt B., Bradley D., Suess C., Hildebolt C. (2004) Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape, Radiology 233, 515-522. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR 2000, Annex D, United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation report to the general assembly (2000) Medical Radiation Exposures, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • UNSCEAR 2000, Annex I, United Nations scientific committee on the effects of atomic radiation report to the general assembly (2000) Epidemiological evaluation of radiation-induced cancer, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Vassileva J. et al. (2012) IAEA survey of pediatric CT practice in 40 countries in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Africa: Part 1, frequency and appropriateness, Am. J. Roentgenol. 198, 1021-1031. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vock P. (2005) CT dose reduction in children, Eur. Radiol. 15, 2330-2340. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Ware D.E., Huda W., Mergo P.J., Litwiller A.L. (1999) Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations, Radiology 210, 645-650. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Wormanns D. et al. (2001) Abdominal spiral CT in children: which radiation exposure is required? Eur. Radiol. 11, 2262-2266. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Xu X.G., Eckerman K.F. (2010) Applications to computed tomography for pediatric patients. In: Handbook of anatomical models for radiation dosimetry, pp. 487-510. Taylor & Francis, New York. [Google Scholar]
  • Yekeler E. (2004) Pediatric abdominal applications of multidetector-row CT, Eur. J. Radiol. 52, 31-43. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Zankl M., Panzer W., Petoussi N., Drexler G. (1995) Organ doses for children from computed tomographic examinations, Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 57, 393-396. [Google Scholar]
  • Zeman R.K., Baron R.L., Jeffery R.B. Jr,Klein J., Siegel M.J., Silverman P.M. (1998) Helical body CT: evolution of scanning protocols, Am. J. Roentgenol. 170, 1427-1438. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.